Lawrence Tan

Lawrence Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and unconscionability. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lawrence Tan has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dissipation of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leave of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deep Linking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Internet Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lawrence Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lawrence Tan has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	3 cases	33% of cases	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Freezing Order for Asset Dissipation(Nov 2014) Excalibur Land v Win-Win Aluminium: Dispute over Property Purchase & Subcontract Set-Off(May 2013) Excalibur Group v Goh Boon Kok: Application for Leave to Sue Liquidator for Breach of Contract and Fraud(Apr 2012)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	22% of cases	Yokogawa v Transtel: Estoppel & Arbitration Stay in Construction Dispute(Jan 2009) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Amendment of Pleadings and Mitigation of Loss(May 2006)
Prestige Legal LLP	1 cases	11% of cases	Kelington Engineering v Gan Cheng Chuan: Parol Evidence Rule & Liquidated Damages(Apr 2022)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	11% of cases	Eltraco v CGH: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability in Construction Contract(Sep 2000)
Wong Partnership	1 cases	11% of cases	Pacific Internet Ltd v Catcha.com Pte Ltd: Trespass, Copyright Infringement & Deep Linking(May 2000)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	11% of cases	Kaki Bukit v Ng Man Heng: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lawrence Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.5 parties avg	3.5	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lawrence Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(67%)	67%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	192,214.10	32,035.686 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kelington Engineering v Gan Cheng Chuan: Parol Evidence Rule & Liquidated Damages 25 Apr 2022 Gan Cheng Chuan (Defendant)Won	25 Apr 2022	Gan Cheng Chuan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Freezing Order for Asset Dissipation 20 Nov 2014 Others (Defendant)Lost	20 Nov 2014	Others (Defendant): Application grantedFreezing order granted against the defendant.
3	Excalibur Land v Win-Win Aluminium: Dispute over Property Purchase & Subcontract Set-Off 21 May 2013 Leck Kim Koon (Defendant)Lost	21 May 2013	Leck Kim Koon (Defendant): Judgment against guarantorThe plaintiff shall have, at its option, final judgment against the first and second defendants in the sum of $94,107.05 with interest (from the date of the writ) and two sets of costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Alternatively, the plaintiff shall have interlocutory judgment (with costs) against both defendants with damages to be assessed by the Registrar with the issue of costs and interest reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Excalibur Group v Goh Boon Kok: Application for Leave to Sue Liquidator for Breach of Contract and Fraud 04 Apr 2012 Goh Boon Kok (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2012	Goh Boon Kok (Defendant): Application for Leave GrantedThe court granted the plaintiff leave to commence action against the defendant.
5	Yokogawa v Transtel: Estoppel & Arbitration Stay in Construction Dispute 01 Jan 2009 Yokogawa Engineering Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jan 2009	Yokogawa Engineering Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for a stay of arbitration proceedings was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $4,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Amendment of Pleadings and Mitigation of Loss 17 May 2006 Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	17 May 2006	Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs reserved.
7	Kaki Bukit v Ng Man Heng: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 24 Mar 2004 Syarikat Kesenangan Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	24 Mar 2004	Syarikat Kesenangan Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal for a stay of proceedings was dismissed, with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Eltraco v CGH: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability in Construction Contract 17 Sep 2000 Eltraco International Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	17 Sep 2000	Eltraco International Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe amount which the respondents be permitted to call and receive from the bond should be reduced from $1.6m to $600,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Pacific Internet Ltd v Catcha.com Pte Ltd: Trespass, Copyright Infringement & Deep Linking 09 May 2000 Catcha.com Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	09 May 2000	Catcha.com Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).