CCM Industrial v 70 Shenton: Performance Bond & Unconscionability in Construction Contract Termination
CCM Industrial Pte Ltd, a building contractor, sought an injunction against 70 Shenton Pte Ltd to prevent them from receiving payment under a performance bond issued by The Overseas Assurance Corporation Limited, following the termination of their construction contract. The High Court dismissed CCM's application, finding that CCM failed to establish a strong prima facie case of unconscionability on the part of 70 Shenton in calling on the performance bond. The court noted CCM's lack of response to concerns raised about project delays prior to the termination.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Summons dismissed with costs.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
CCM Industrial sought to restrain 70 Shenton from calling on a performance bond. The court dismissed CCM's application, finding no strong prima facie case of unconscionability.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Overseas Assurance Corporation Limited | Defendant | Corporation | Neutral | Neutral | |
CCM Industrial Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Application Dismissed | Lost | |
70 Shenton Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Successful in resisting injunction | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Woo Bih Li | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- CCM was engaged by 70 Shenton as the main contractor for a construction project.
- The contract included a performance bond issued by OAC.
- The architect raised concerns about delays in the micro-piling works.
- 70 Shenton terminated CCM's employment due to the alleged delays.
- 70 Shenton made a demand on OAC for payment under the performance bond.
- CCM sought an injunction to restrain 70 Shenton from receiving payment under the performance bond.
5. Formal Citations
- CCM Industrial Pte Ltd v 70 Shenton Pte Ltd and another, Originating Summons No 269 of 2014, [2014] SGHC 75
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
CCM engaged by 70 Shenton as main contractor. | |
Performance Bond Policy No 2012-A0414201-GPB issued by OAC. | |
Architect informed CCM of delays. | |
Termination Certificate issued. | |
70 Shenton terminated CCM's employment. | |
70 Shenton demanded payment under the PB. | |
CCM filed Originating Summons and Summons. | |
Summons heard and dismissed. | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Unconscionability
- Outcome: The court found that CCM had failed to establish a strong prima facie case of unconscionability on the part of 70 Shenton in calling on the performance bond.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2012] 3 SLR 352
8. Remedies Sought
- Declaration that 70 Shenton is not entitled to receive payment under the performance bond
- Injunction to restrain 70 Shenton from receiving payment under the performance bond
9. Cause of Actions
- Injunction to restrain call on performance bond
10. Practice Areas
- Construction Litigation
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BS Mount Sophia Pte Ltd v Join-Aim Pte Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 3 SLR 352 | Singapore | Cited for the principles on granting an injunction to restrain a beneficiary from calling on a performance bond. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Performance Bond
- Unconscionability
- Termination Certificate
- Micro-piling
- Delay
- Injunction
15.2 Keywords
- Performance bond
- construction contract
- injunction
- unconscionability
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Unconscionability | 95 |
Performance Bond | 90 |
Injunctions | 85 |
Contract Law | 70 |
Construction Law | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Construction Dispute
- Contract Law
- Performance Bonds