Paul Tan

Paul Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and international arbitration act. Their track record shows a 28.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 28% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Tan has demonstrated expertise across 152 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Infra petita	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formalities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Environmental Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commodities Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Customs Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Rubber Association Contract (IRAC)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vessel Lease Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charterparty Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Animal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Demise Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied term of mutual trust and confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building Plans	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guerrilla tactics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Tan has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 20 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	20 cases	56% of cases	Prudential Assurance v Peter Tan: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Restraint of Trade in Mass Agent Departure(May 2021) Oxley Consortium v Geetex: Recourse Against Award & Appeal Under Arbitration Act(Nov 2020) Sun Travels v Hilton: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Enforceability of Foreign Assets(Jul 2020)
Rajah & Tann LLP	8 cases	22% of cases	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Interpretation of Interview Agreement & Copyright of Lee Kuan Yew's Transcripts(Sep 2016) PP v Wong Wee Keong: Endangered Species Act & Illegal Rosewood Import(May 2016) Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Garnishee Order, Beneficial Ownership & Debt Determination(May 2015)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	6% of cases	The "Chem Orchid": Admiralty Jurisdiction, Demise Charter, and Ostensible Authority Dispute(Jan 2014) TMM v Pacific Richfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Vessel Sale Dispute(Sep 2013)
Hee Theng Fong and Co	2 cases	6% of cases	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession & Land Title Extinguishment(Sep 2005) TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession Claim under Land Titles Act(Feb 2005)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	3% of cases	Registrar of Vehicles v Komoco Motors: Judicial Review & ARF Calculation(May 2008)
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Sale in Thailand(Aug 2010)
Peter Low LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co: Constructive Dismissal & Damages(Aug 2014)
Cavenagh Law LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	CKG v. CKH: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Consider Principal Debt(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 10 (28%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	203.6 parties avg	3.6	56%
Partial	52.4 parties avg	2.4	14%
Stayed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Won	104.7 parties avg	4.7	28%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	53.2 parties avg	3.2
2015	26.2 parties avg	6.2
2016	65.5 parties avg	5.5
2017	73.3 parties avg	3.3
2018	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	20(56%)	56%
Partial	5(14%)	14%
Stayed	1(3%)	3%
Won	10(28%)	28%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	14,041,678.74	739,035.7219 cases	19

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	6 42	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2017	7 412	Lost: 4 cases (57.1%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 2 cases (28.6%)
2018	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 36 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CKG v. CKH: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Consider Principal Debt 17 Jun 2021 CKG (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	17 Jun 2021	CKG (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application in relation to the Principal Debt Issue succeeds to the extent that all the Dispositive Section of the Award, as well as those parts specifically affected by the failure to determine the Principal Debt Issue and interest thereon should be set aside, if the Tribunal is unable to eliminate the grounds for setting them aside.The court found that the Tribunal failed to take into account an issue which was before it, namely the existence and quantum of the Principal Debt and accruing interest, which was common ground between the parties, and which it accepted at the time of the hearing should be taken into account.
2	Prudential Assurance v Peter Tan: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Restraint of Trade in Mass Agent Departure 04 May 2021 Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Partial	04 May 2021	Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part; damages to be assessed.
3	Oxley Consortium v Geetex: Recourse Against Award & Appeal Under Arbitration Act 04 Nov 2020 Oxley Consortium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	04 Nov 2020	Oxley Consortium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Sun Travels v Hilton: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Enforceability of Foreign Assets 05 Jul 2020 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Jul 2020	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe respondent's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
5	Kong Hoo v Public Prosecutor: Interpreting 'In Transit' under the Endangered Species Act 07 Apr 2019 Wong Wee Keong (Applicant)Won	07 Apr 2019	Wong Wee Keong (Applicant): Appeal AllowedConviction quashed and sentence set aside.
6	Yuanta Asset Management v Telemedia Pacific: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Conversion in Joint Venture 19 Jun 2018 Hady Hartanto (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jun 2018	Hady Hartanto (Respondent, Plaintiff): Cross-appeal dismissedThe cross-appeal in CA 1/2017 is dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking 25 Apr 2018 Ilango s/o Venayagam (Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2018	Ilango s/o Venayagam (Defendant): Guilty plea entered; sentenced to 26½ years of imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneIlango was convicted of having the original three blocks containing the cannabis in his possession for the purpose of trafficking.
8	Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement 13 Mar 2018 Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Mar 2018	Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff): Limited permanent anti-suit injunction grantedLimited permanent anti-suit injunction granted in relation to the March Judgment, a declaration that the Awards were final, valid and binding on the parties, and a declaration that the defendant’s claim in the Maldivian action was in respect of disputes between the plaintiff and defendant that have arisen out of or in connection with the Agreement and any consequential proceedings (including appeals) would be in breach of the arbitration agreement contained in the Agreement. It was also made clear that nothing in the order would prevent the defendant from objecting to the recognition or enforcement of the Awards in accordance with Maldivian law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Pram Nair v Public Prosecutor: Rape, Intoxication, and Consent 24 Sep 2017 Pram Nair (Appellant)Partial	24 Sep 2017	Pram Nair (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence for rape charge dismissed. Appeal against sentence for digital penetration charge allowed in part.
10	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Copyright, Contractual Terms & Ownership of Lee Kuan Yew's Interview Transcripts 16 Aug 2017 Lee Hsien Yang (Appellant)Lost	16 Aug 2017	Lee Hsien Yang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the estate is not entitled to the declarations sought.
11	Cheong Kok Leong v Cheong Woon Weng: Oral Agreement, Property Trust, and HDB Ownership Dispute 14 Aug 2017 Cheong Kok Leong (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	14 Aug 2017	Cheong Kok Leong (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
12	PP v Kong Hoo: Endangered Species Act & Rosewood Import 25 May 2017 Wong Wee Keong (Respondent)Lost	25 May 2017	Wong Wee Keong (Respondent): Imprisonment and FineWong Wee Keong was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment and a fine of $500,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Public Prosecutor v Kong Hoo: Endangered Species Act Import Violation 29 Mar 2017 Wong Wee Keong (Respondent)Lost	29 Mar 2017	Wong Wee Keong (Respondent): ConvictedThe respondent was convicted of the charges.
14	Telemedia Pacific Group v Yuanta: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 12 Mar 2017 Hady Hartanto (Plaintiff)Won	12 Mar 2017	Hady Hartanto (Plaintiff): Summons dismissedThe court dismissed the Defendant's summons and ordered the Defendant to pay costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Yuanta Asset Management v Telemedia Pacific: Security for Costs in Appeal 09 Feb 2017 Hady Hartanto (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff)Won	09 Feb 2017	Hady Hartanto (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff): Application allowedThe respondent's application for additional security for costs was allowed, with the appellant ordered to furnish an additional SGD 20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Telemedia Pacific v Yuanta: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Conversion 06 Dec 2016 Hady Hartanto (Plaintiff)Won	06 Dec 2016	Hady Hartanto (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded for unauthorized sales of shares, plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Re Landau: Ad Hoc Admission for CMNC's Arbitration Award Challenge 27 Nov 2016 China Machine New Energy Corporation (Other)Lost	27 Nov 2016	China Machine New Energy Corporation (Other): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission dismissed with costs fixed at $6,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Interpretation of Interview Agreement & Copyright of Lee Kuan Yew's Transcripts 27 Sep 2016 Lee Hsien Yang (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Sep 2016	Lee Hsien Yang (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for declaratory relief was dismissed.
19	Re Wordsworth: Ad Hoc Admission for Lesotho's Investor-State Arbitration Challenge 28 Aug 2016 Kingdom of Lesotho (Applicant)Won	28 Aug 2016	Kingdom of Lesotho (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for ad hoc admission allowed.
20	PP v Wong Wee Keong: Endangered Species Act & Illegal Rosewood Import 04 May 2016 Kong Hoo Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 May 2016	Kong Hoo Pte Ltd (Respondent): Acquittal Set AsideThe acquittal was set aside, and the case was remitted to the District Judge for the defence to be called.
21	Susan Lim v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal on Party-and-Party Costs for Disciplinary Hearings 08 Mar 2016 DR SUSAN LIM MEY LEE (Appellant)Lost	08 Mar 2016	DR SUSAN LIM MEY LEE (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the High Court Judge was dismissed.
22	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Garnishee Order, Beneficial Ownership & Debt Determination 26 May 2015 Cajevac (Previously Known as Rudi Cajavec) (Defendant)Lost	26 May 2015	Cajevac (Previously Known as Rudi Cajavec) (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court found that the Other Parties failed to discharge their legal burden to demonstrate their ownership.
23	Singapore Medical Council v Lim Mey Lee Susan: Review of Party-and-Party Bills of Costs for Disciplinary Proceedings 12 May 2015 LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Respondent)Partial	12 May 2015	LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Respondent): PartialThe court reviewed the Assistant Registrar's taxation of costs, adjusting the amounts allowed for the inquiry before the disciplinary committees and the appeal to the Court of Three Judges. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	R1 International v Lonstroff: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement in Rubber Trade 20 Nov 2014 R1 International Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	20 Nov 2014	R1 International Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; anti-suit injunction granted; costs of $40,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Procedural Breaches and Public Policy Violation 29 Oct 2014 Triulzi Cesare SRL (Applicant)Lost	29 Oct 2014	Triulzi Cesare SRL (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co: Constructive Dismissal & Damages 06 Aug 2014 Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard (Appellant)Lost	06 Aug 2014	Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant's claim for damages beyond the contractual notice period was legally unsustainable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	CCM Industrial v 70 Shenton: Performance Bond & Unconscionability in Construction Contract Termination 15 Apr 2014 CCM Industrial Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Apr 2014	CCM Industrial Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for an interim injunction to restrain 70 Shenton from receiving payment under the performance bond was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	The "Chem Orchid": Admiralty Jurisdiction, Demise Charter, and Ostensible Authority Dispute 05 Jan 2014 Han Kook Capital Co, Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Jan 2014	Han Kook Capital Co, Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court set aside the ADM proceedings against the vessel.
29	TMM v Pacific Richfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Vessel Sale Dispute 22 Sep 2013 TMM Division Maritima SA de CV (Applicant)Lost	22 Sep 2013	TMM Division Maritima SA de CV (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct and Ethical Obligations of Medical Practitioners 27 Jun 2013 LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2013	LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the Disciplinary Committee's decision was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
31	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Sale in Thailand 02 Aug 2010 Maria Ng (Plaintiff)Stayed	02 Aug 2010	Maria Ng (Plaintiff): Action stayedAction stayed for parties to resolve title issues in Thai courts; contractual issues reserved.
32	Law Society v Choy Chee Yean: Misconduct of Advocate and Solicitor 24 May 2010 Choy Chee Yean (Respondent)Lost	24 May 2010	Choy Chee Yean (Respondent): Struck off the rollThe Respondent was ordered to be struck off the roll and bear the costs of the proceedings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	BNP Paribas v Jurong Shipyard: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Contested Debt 08 Mar 2009 BNP Paribas (Appellant)Lost	08 Mar 2009	BNP Paribas (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	Registrar of Vehicles v Komoco Motors: Judicial Review & ARF Calculation 07 May 2008 Registrar of Vehicles (Appellant)Won	07 May 2008	Registrar of Vehicles (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below.
35	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession & Land Title Extinguishment 12 Sep 2005 TSM Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	12 Sep 2005	TSM Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the appellant's title to the disputed strip has not been extinguished.
36	TSM Development v Pereira: Adverse Possession Claim under Land Titles Act 28 Feb 2005 TSM Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	28 Feb 2005	TSM Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for a declaration that the land in dispute is not subject to any adverse possession rights was dismissed.