CCM Industrial Pte Ltd

CCM Industrial Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms.

Legal Representation

CCM Industrial Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Legal Clinic LLC	1 case	Ng Hweelon
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Paul Tan Thea Sonya Raman
Veritas Law Corporation	1 case	Leong Yung Chang

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CCM Industrial Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CCM Industrial Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2014-sghc-75 15 Apr 2014	15 Apr 2014	Plaintiff	LostApplication for an interim injunction to restrain 70 Shenton from receiving payment under the performance bond was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2014-sghc-72 14 Apr 2014	14 Apr 2014	Defendant	LostDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2008-sghc-216 20 Nov 2008	20 Nov 2008	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostCCM Industrial's appeal against the decision of the district judge in awarding costs on an indemnity basis to Uniquetech Pte Ltd was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.