UVM Investment Corporation

UVM Investment Corporation is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

UVM Investment Corporation has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	1 case	Akesh Abhilash Chia Tze Yung Justin Kok Yee Keong Andy Lem Justin Chia Jaclyn Leong
Providence Law Asia LLC	1 case	Danny Quah Vergis Abraham

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of UVM Investment Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of UVM Investment Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sgca-51 29 Aug 2017	29 Aug 2017	Respondent	LostAppeal allowed; the Judge’s order sanctioning the Schemes as well as his order for a one-year moratorium under s 210(10) of the Companies Act on all pending, contingent or fresh actions against the two Scheme Companies with effect from 29 August 2016 was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2016-sghc-279 19 Dec 2016	19 Dec 2016	Applicant	WonThe court granted the sanction for the proposed scheme of arrangement.
3	2015-sghc-322 16 Dec 2015	16 Dec 2015	Applicant	WonRestraint order granted for 10 weeks, unless discharged earlier.