Mohd Aziz v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Drug Trafficking

Mohd Aziz bin Hussain appealed to the Court of Appeal of Singapore against his conviction by the trial judge for possession of not less than 49.98g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The Court of Appeal, comprising Judith Prakash JA, Tay Yong Kwang JA, and Chao Hick Tin SJ, heard the appeal on 9 November 2018 and dismissed it on 15 November 2018, upholding the trial judge's findings.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Oral Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Mohd Aziz appeals against his conviction for possession of diamorphine for trafficking. The Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal, upholding the trial judge's findings.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Tan Zhongshan of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Kenny Yang of Attorney-General’s Chambers
MOHD AZIZ BIN HUSSAINAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudge of AppealYes
Tay Yong KwangJudge of AppealNo
Chao Hick TinSenior JudgeNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The appellant was convicted of possessing not less than 49.98g of diamorphine for trafficking.
  2. Two prosecution witnesses, Mr. Rashid and Ms. Nordiana, gave evidence implicating the appellant.
  3. The appellant gave eight inculpatory statements admitting possession and knowledge of the drugs.
  4. CNB officers conducted a stakeout operation on the day of the appellant's arrest.
  5. The appellant argued that the Judge placed undue weight on the evidence of Mr Rashid and Ms Nordiana.
  6. The appellant argued that the Judge placed undue weight on the eight inculpatory statements given by the appellant.
  7. The appellant emphasized that none of the CNB officers saw him carrying the pink paper bag.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Mohd Aziz bin Hussain v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Appeal No 64 of 2017, [2018] SGCA 77

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Events of the morning
Appeal heard
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Possession of Diamorphine for Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for possession of diamorphine for trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Reliability of Witness Testimony
    • Outcome: The court found that the trial judge did not err in placing weight on the evidence of the witnesses.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Inconsistent evidence
      • Contradicted by objective evidence
  3. Admissibility and Weight of Inculpatory Statements
    • Outcome: The court found that there was a consistent thread running through the statements and that the appellant could not furnish a satisfactory explanation for the admissions made.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Material inconsistencies between statements
      • Unreliable statements

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction and sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals
  • Drug Offences

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
ss 5(1)(a) read with 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 17 of the MDASingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Inculpatory statements
  • CNB officers
  • Stakeout operation
  • Possession
  • Misuse of Drugs Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug trafficking
  • Criminal appeal
  • Singapore
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Diamorphine

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offences
  • Appeals