Koh Jaw Hung v Public Prosecutor: Online Vice Ring, Women's Charter Offences & Sentencing

Koh Jaw Hung, the appellant, appealed to the High Court of Singapore against the sentence imposed by the District Judge for vice-related offences under the Women’s Charter. The charges included living on immoral earnings, receiving a prostitute, harbouring a prostitute, and operating a remote communication service. Hoo Sheau Peng J dismissed the appeal, finding no basis for appellate intervention and upholding the original sentence of imprisonment and fines.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Koh Jaw Hung appealed his sentence for Women's Charter offences related to operating an online vice ring. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the original sentence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Gail Wong of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Michael Quilindo of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Koh Jaw HungAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Hoo Sheau PengJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Gail WongAttorney-General’s Chambers
Michael QuilindoAttorney-General’s Chambers
Nicholas NarayananNicholas & Tan Partnership LLP
Selina YapNicholas & Tan Partnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. The appellant set up an online vice ring involving seven prostitutes.
  2. The appellant procured women from Thailand to work as prostitutes in Singapore.
  3. The appellant created a website to advertise the services of the prostitutes.
  4. The appellant purchased a SIM card registered under a foreign worker's name.
  5. The appellant managed the prostitutes, arranged their accommodation, and collected their earnings.
  6. The appellant was apprehended following police raids on two hotels.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Koh Jaw Hung v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate’s Appeal No 9161 of 2018, [2018] SGHC 251

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Appellant set up a vice ring
Appellant procured women from Thailand to work as prostitutes in Singapore
Appellant created a website to advertise the services of the prostitutes
Appellant purchased a SIM card
Appellant managed a total of seven prostitutes
Appellant was apprehended
Hearing Date
Hearing Date
Judgment Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing for Vice-Related Offences
    • Outcome: The court upheld the original sentence, finding no basis for appellate intervention.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Appropriateness of imprisonment terms
      • Quantum of fines for disgorgement of profits
      • Consideration of expenses in determining net profit
      • Application of the principle of totality
  2. Application of Sentencing Benchmarks
    • Outcome: The court found that the sentencing benchmarks were appropriately applied and that the sentences were not manifestly excessive.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Relevance of Poh Boon Kiat benchmarks
      • Comparison with other District Court cases
      • Categorization of culpability and harm
  3. Disgorgement of Profits
    • Outcome: The court held that expenses may be considered but the burden is on the offender to prove them. The court found no basis to disturb the District Judge's assessment of the fine.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether gross or net earnings should be considered
      • Whether expenses should be deducted
      • Ability of the offender to pay the fine

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence
  2. Reduction of imprisonment terms
  3. Reduction of fines

9. Cause of Actions

  • Living on immoral earnings
  • Receiving a prostitute
  • Harbouring a prostitute
  • Operating a remote communication service

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Statutory Offences

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Poh Boon Kiat v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2014] 4 SLR 892SingaporeCited for the sentencing framework for offences of receiving or harbouring a prostitute and for living on immoral earnings.
Public Prosecutor v Desmo VuDistrict CourtYes[2016] SGDC 229SingaporeCited and distinguished regarding the degree of harm and culpability in prostitution-related offences.
Public Prosecutor v Zhang WeidaDistrict CourtYes[2017] SGDC 123SingaporeCited and distinguished regarding the role of the accused in prostitution-related offences.
Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok HingCourt of AppealYes[2008] 2 SLR(R) 684SingaporeCited for the principle that an appellate court will not interfere with a sentence unless it is wrong in principle or manifestly excessive.
Public Prosecutor v UICourt of AppealYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 500SingaporeCited for the definition of a manifestly excessive sentence.
Public Prosecutor v Quek Chin ChoonHigh CourtYes[2015] 1 SLR 1169SingaporeCited regarding the confiscatory purpose of fines and the consideration of profits in sentencing for vice-related charges.
Public Prosecutor v Chew Tiong WeiDistrict CourtYes[2016] SGDC 59SingaporeCited regarding the consideration of net earnings after deducting expenses in sentencing for vice-related charges.
Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2012] 2 SLR 375SingaporeCited regarding the principle of totality in sentencing and the consideration of imprisonment terms in default of payment of fines.
Low Meng Chay v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[1993] 1 SLR(R) 46SingaporeCited regarding the sentencing court's consideration of the offender's ability to pay when imposing a fine.
Zhang Weida v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYesZhang Weida v Public Prosecutor Magistrate’s Appeal No 9114 of 2017SingaporeCited and distinguished regarding the role of the accused in prostitution-related offences.
Chew Tiong Wei v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYesChew Tiong Wei v Public Prosecutor Magistrate’s Appeal No 9032 of 2016SingaporeCited regarding the consideration of net earnings after deducting expenses in sentencing for vice-related charges.
Public Prosecutor v Lim Kim Lwee AndrewDistrict CourtYesPublic Prosecutor v Lim Kim Lwee Andrew SC-904213-2014SingaporeCited regarding the imprisonment terms in default of one month’s imprisonment for a fine of $5,000.
Public Prosecutor v Quek Chin ChoonHigh CourtYes[2016] 1 SLR 1169SingaporeCited regarding the confiscatory purpose of fines and the consideration of profits in sentencing for vice-related charges.
R v GarnerCourt of AppealYesR v Garner [1986] 1 WLR 73England and WalesCited regarding the fines should not be depressed on account of the totality and proportionality principles.
R v SavundraCourt of AppealYesR v Savundra (1968) 52 Cr App R 637England and WalesCited regarding the court should ensure that in the event of default the total sentence to be served is not disproportionate to the offence.
R v Green and GreenCourt of AppealYesR v Green and Green (1984) 6 Cr App R (S) 329England and WalesCited regarding the court should ensure that in the event of default the total sentence to be served is not disproportionate to the offence.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 146(1) of the Women’s CharterSingapore
s 140(1)(d) of the Women’s CharterSingapore
s 146A(1)(a) of the Women’s CharterSingapore
Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act (Cap 184, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 19 of the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act (Cap 184, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Vice ring
  • Prostitution
  • Immoral earnings
  • Remote communication service
  • Sentencing benchmarks
  • Disgorgement of profits
  • Totality principle

15.2 Keywords

  • Vice
  • Prostitution
  • Women's Charter
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Online Vice

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Vice Offences