Nicholas Narayanan

Nicholas Narayanan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated expertise across 91 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Residential Property Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of trust deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trustee’s duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Void marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subcontracting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voidable Marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right of Set-Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Piling Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Narayanan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Narayanan has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Nicholas & Tan Partnership LLP	13 cases	57% of cases	Quek Peng Hock Henry v Chia Swee Hun: Resulting Trusts, Inter Vivos Gifts, Undue Influence(May 2023) O’Laughlin Industries v Tan Thiam Hock: Conspiracy, Breach of Trust, and Misuse of Company Goods(Feb 2021) Koh Jaw Hung v Public Prosecutor: Online Vice Ring, Women's Charter Offences & Sentencing(Nov 2018)
Nicholas & Co	4 cases	17% of cases	Altus Technologies v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Set-Off Rights in Judicial Management(Jul 2009) Tan Ah Thee v Lim Soo Foong: Declaration of Marriage Validity & Undue Influence(Apr 2009) Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments: Stay of Proceedings Under International Arbitration Act(Nov 2008)
Ang and Partners	2 cases	9% of cases	Lin Tsang Kit v Chng Thiam Kwee: Breach of Trust and Misrepresentation in Koya Wood Shares Purchase(Jan 2005) Sabah Shipyard v Government of Pakistan: Jurisdiction in Arbitration over Prior Proceedings' Costs(May 2004)
Ang & Partners	1 cases	4% of cases	Resource Piling v Geocon Piling: Breach of Subcontract & Damages for Piling Works(Jul 2006)
Nicholas & Tan LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Tjong Very Sumito v Chan Sing En: Security for Costs & Ordinary Residence(Nov 2010)
Michael Hwang	1 cases	4% of cases	PP v Lew Syn Pau: Financial Assistance for Share Acquisition & Corporate Veil(Aug 2006)
JLC Advisors LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Jocelyn Rita v Tan Gark Chong: Breach of Trust, Rental Income, Property Value Diminution(May 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Narayanan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 5 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	23.0 parties avg	3.0	9%
Lost	92.1 parties avg	2.1	39%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	114.2 parties avg	4.2	48%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2008	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Narayanan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(8%)	8%
Lost	9(35%)	35%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Partial	3(12%)	12%
Won	11(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,659,846.92	304,987.2412 cases	12
USD	4,554,080.00	2,277,040.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Quek Peng Hock Henry v Chia Swee Hun: Resulting Trusts, Inter Vivos Gifts, Undue Influence 31 May 2023 Quek Peng Hock Henry (Plaintiff)Won	31 May 2023	Quek Peng Hock Henry (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff. The court ordered Chia to transfer properties, return funds, account for moneys, and pay damages to Henry. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	O’Laughlin Industries v Tan Thiam Hock: Conspiracy, Breach of Trust, and Misuse of Company Goods 10 Feb 2021 O’Laughlin Corporation Limited (Plaintiff)Won	10 Feb 2021	O’Laughlin Corporation Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff against First Defendant and Pegasus Chemical Pte Ltd for US$1,677,040 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the plaintiffs are Hong Kong companies).
3	Jocelyn Rita v Tan Gark Chong: Breach of Trust, Rental Income, Property Value Diminution 13 May 2019 Jocelyn Rita d/o Lawrence Stanley (Plaintiff)Partial	13 May 2019	Jocelyn Rita d/o Lawrence Stanley (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim for loss of rental for the Wajek Property from August 2013 to 16 August 2017 allowed, with the quantum to be assessed. Claim for loss of rental and diminution in value of the Ampang Property dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Koh Jaw Hung v Public Prosecutor: Online Vice Ring, Women's Charter Offences & Sentencing 18 Nov 2018 Koh Jaw Hung (Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2018	Koh Jaw Hung (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the sentence imposed by the District Judge was dismissed.
5	RBC Properties v Defu Furniture: Misrepresentation & Lease Rescission 16 Dec 2014 RBC Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	16 Dec 2014	RBC Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Court of Appeal found that the Appellant's misrepresentation was innocent, entitling the Respondent to rescind the Lease and to a consequential indemnity for sums paid over as part of its obligations under the Lease. The Appellant was found to be in repudiatory breach of the terms of the Lease.
6	Defu Furniture v RBC Properties: Rescission of Lease for Misrepresentation 01 Jan 2014 RBC Properties Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Jan 2014	RBC Properties Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed (currency assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Energenics Pte Ltd v Musse Singapore Pte Ltd: Inventorship Rights & Patents Act Dispute 18 Jul 2013 Musse Incorporated (Defendant)Won	18 Jul 2013	Musse Incorporated (Defendant): Claims against Musse Incorporated related to Mr. Mansel's inventorship dismissedEnergenics' claims related to Mr. Mansel's inventorship were dismissed.
8	PPG Industries v Compact Metal: Breach of Contract & Delay Costs in Construction 13 Mar 2013 PPG Industries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	13 Mar 2013	PPG Industries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding the award of damages to the plaintiff for additional site preliminaries. The issue of the defendant’s counterclaim be remitted back to the Judge for her decision. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	PT Prima v Kempinski: Illegality, Force Majeure & New Management Contract in Hotel Management Dispute 08 Jul 2012 PT Prima International Development (Appellant, Respondent)Won	08 Jul 2012	PT Prima International Development (Appellant, Respondent): Appeals allowedPrima's appeals in CA 94, 95 and 96 are allowed, and Kempinski’s cross-appeal in CA 98 is dismissed. Prima is awarded costs of these appeals and the proceedings below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Compact Metal Industries v PPG Industries: Construction Dispute, Defective Paint & Damages 29 Apr 2012 PPG Industries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2012	PPG Industries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal dismissed.
11	Tjong Very Sumito v Chan Sing En: Security for Costs & Ordinary Residence 14 Aug 2011 Chan Sing En (Respondent)Won	14 Aug 2011	Chan Sing En (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court upheld the order for security for costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Kempinski Hotels SA v PT Prima International Development: Setting Aside of Arbitration Award 18 Jul 2011 PT Prima International Development (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	18 Jul 2011	PT Prima International Development (Respondent, Defendant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Kempinski Hotels SA v PT Prima: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Wrongful Termination 18 Jul 2011 PT Prima International Development (Respondent)Lost	18 Jul 2011	PT Prima International Development (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to uphold the Third Award, Fourth Award and Costs Award was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
14	Kempinski Hotels SA v PT Prima International Development: Setting Aside Arbitration Award 18 Jul 2011 PT Prima International Development (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	18 Jul 2011	PT Prima International Development (Respondent, Defendant): Costs Award Set AsideThe costs award in favor of PT Prima International Development was set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Tjong Very Sumito v Chan Sing En: Security for Costs & Ordinary Residence 21 Nov 2010 Chan Sing En (Defendant)Won	21 Nov 2010	Chan Sing En (Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; security for costs ordered in favor of the defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Altus Technologies v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Set-Off Rights in Judicial Management 09 Jul 2009 Altus Technologies Pte Ltd (under judicial management) (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jul 2009	Altus Technologies Pte Ltd (under judicial management) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed and fixed costs at $6,500 plus reasonable disbursements were awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Tan Ah Thee v Lim Soo Foong: Declaration of Marriage Validity & Undue Influence 26 Apr 2009 Lim Soo Foong (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 Apr 2009	Lim Soo Foong (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantDefendant's appeal allowed. The plaintiffs’ statement of claim is hereby struck out and the plaintiffs’ claim is dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments: Stay of Proceedings Under International Arbitration Act 09 Nov 2008 Antig Investments Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	09 Nov 2008	Antig Investments Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below fixed at $7,000 excluding disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	STX Corporation v Herry Beng Koestanto: Mareva Injunction & Forum Non Conveniens Dispute 09 Sep 2008 STX Energy Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Sep 2008	STX Energy Co Ltd (Plaintiff): NeutralThe outcome for STX Energy Co Ltd is neutral as the judgment primarily focuses on the Mareva injunction application and stay of proceedings.
20	PP v Lew Syn Pau: Financial Assistance for Share Acquisition & Corporate Veil 10 Aug 2006 Lew Syn Pau (Defendant)Won	10 Aug 2006	Lew Syn Pau (Defendant): AcquittedAcquitted of the charge of abetting Wong Sheung Sze to authorize the company to indirectly give financial assistance.
21	Resource Piling v Geocon Piling: Breach of Subcontract & Damages for Piling Works 25 Jul 2006 Multi-Con Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Dismissed	25 Jul 2006	Multi-Con Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedMulti-Con's action in Suit No 282 of 2004 and its counterclaim against Resource in Suit No 334 of 2004 were dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Lin Tsang Kit v Chng Thiam Kwee: Breach of Trust and Misrepresentation in Koya Wood Shares Purchase 16 Jan 2005 Yip Hing Chung (Plaintiff)Dismissed	16 Jan 2005	Yip Hing Chung (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed pursuant to O 35 r 1(1) of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2004 Rev Ed) due to failure to testify. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Sabah Shipyard v Government of Pakistan: Jurisdiction in Arbitration over Prior Proceedings' Costs 27 May 2004 Sabah Shipyard (Pakistan) Ltd (Applicant)Lost	27 May 2004	Sabah Shipyard (Pakistan) Ltd (Applicant): Originating motion dismissedOriginating motion dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.