UZO v UZP: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Wife Maintenance
In the divorce case of *UZO v UZP and UZQ*, the High Court (Family Division) in Singapore, presided over by Tan Puay Boon JC, issued a judgment on 19 December 2019, concerning the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for the three children and the wife. The court determined the division ratio of the matrimonial assets to be 58.5:41.5 between the husband and the wife, and made orders for the husband to transfer a sum of money to the wife. The court also made orders for child maintenance and wife maintenance.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court (Family Division)1.2 Outcome
Orders made for division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for children and wife.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Divorce case concerning the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for the children and wife. The court determined the division ratio and maintenance amounts.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tan Puay Boon | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The wife and husband were married on 20 May 1998 and have three children.
- The wife filed for divorce on 30 June 2016, citing the husband's adultery.
- The interim judgment was granted on 7 February 2017.
- The husband was the primary breadwinner during the marriage.
- The wife was primarily responsible for looking after the household and raising the children.
- The parties agreed to joint custody of the children, with the wife having care and control.
- The parties agreed that the global assessment methodology should be used to determine the division ratio of their matrimonial assets.
5. Formal Citations
- UZO v UZP and another, , [2019] SGHCF 27
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant | |
Birth of the first child | |
Birth of the second child | |
Birth of the third child | |
Wife filed a writ for divorce | |
Husband filed a defence and counterclaim | |
Wife was granted an interim maintenance order | |
Interim maintenance order took effect | |
Interim judgment granted | |
Husband allegedly failed to pay wife's salary | |
Joint Valuation Report was completed | |
Wife filed an application in Family Court Summons No 3017 of 2018 | |
Husband’s appeal against the Family Court’s decision in FC/SUM 3017/2018 was dismissed | |
Ancillary matters hearing | |
Further ancillary matters hearing | |
Parties submitted a table summarising their direct contributions | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court divided the matrimonial assets based on a ratio of 58.5:41.5 between the husband and the wife.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2007] 3 SLR(R) 743
- [2015] 4 SLR 1043
- Maintenance for Children
- Outcome: The court ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance for each child and to bear the full tuition fees and accommodation costs of the two elder children’s tertiary education.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2016] 4 SLR 674
- [2014] 2 SLR 705
- Maintenance for Wife
- Outcome: The court ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance to the wife for a period of 12 months.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2016] SGCA 2
- [2017] 1 SLR 609
- Adverse Inference
- Outcome: The court declined to draw an adverse inference against the husband.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [2018] SGCA 78
- [2017] 4 SLR 799
8. Remedies Sought
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Maintenance for Children
- Maintenance for Wife
- Costs
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
- Adultery
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Litigation
- Matrimonial Asset Division
- Child Maintenance
- Wife Maintenance
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NK v NL | High Court | Yes | [2007] 3 SLR(R) 743 | Singapore | Cited for the four distinct phases of the global assessment methodology for division of matrimonial assets. |
ACW v ACX | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 53 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that instructions to a valuer should be disclosed to provide the court with a proper understanding of the valuation report. |
Evergreat Construction Co Pte Ltd v Presscrete Engineering Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2006] 1 SLR(R) 634 | Singapore | Cited for the proposition that parties who have jointly appointed an expert can only challenge the expert’s determination on the grounds of fraud or collusion, but distinguished in the present case. |
Quek Kwee Kee Victoria (in her personal capacity and as executor of the state of Quek Kiat Siong, deceased) and another v Quek Khuay Chuah | High Court | Yes | [2014] 4 SLR 1 | Singapore | Cited for the proposition that parties who have jointly appointed an expert can only challenge the expert’s determination on the grounds of fraud or collusion, but distinguished in the present case. |
BOR v BOS and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2018] SGCA 78 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that withdrawals that may legitimately be explained as genuine expenditures on personal expenses, business or investments ought to be disregarded. |
TXW v TXX | High Court | Yes | [2017] 4 SLR 799 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that parties to a functioning marriage do not keep records of their transactions with a view to building a case should a divorce occur. |
ANJ v ANK | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2015] 4 SLR 1043 | Singapore | Cited for the structured approach to determine the division of matrimonial assets. |
Pang Rosaline v Chan Kong Chin | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2009] 4 SLR(R) 935 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the managerial role of a wife in ensuring the smooth running of a household is essential and important. |
ANH v ANI | High Court | Yes | [2019] SGHC 170 | Singapore | Cited for the appropriate quantum of maintenance that should be ordered in relation to a child who had just enrolled in an Australian university. |
AUA v ATZ | High Court | Yes | [2016] 4 SLR 674 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the focus of the court’s inquiry in considering the issue of maintenance for the child is the financial needs of the child. |
AXM v AXO | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2014] 2 SLR 705 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court in ordering maintenance must also take into account a former husband’s financial resources. |
ATE v ATD and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2016] SGCA 2 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court will take into account a wife’s share of the matrimonial assets upon division when assessing the appropriate quantum of maintenance to be ordered. |
TNL v TNK and another appeal and another matter | High Court | Yes | [2017] 1 SLR 609 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court should only order such maintenance as to allow the Wife to weather the transition of the divorce. |
UAP v UAQ | High Court | Yes | [2018] 3 SLR 319 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that maintenance arrears incurred after the IJ date should be given effect to post-division of assets, by increasing any sum payable by the Husband. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial Assets
- Interim Judgment
- Global Assessment Methodology
- Direct Contributions
- Indirect Contributions
- Maintenance
- Joint Custody
- Care and Control
- Division Ratio
- Valuation Report
15.2 Keywords
- divorce
- matrimonial assets
- child maintenance
- wife maintenance
- family law
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Matrimonial Assets | 95 |
Family Law | 95 |
Maintenance | 90 |
Divorce | 90 |
Maintenance (Child) | 85 |
Maintenance (Wife) | 80 |
Children's Welfare | 75 |
Child Custody | 70 |
Child Support | 65 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Child Maintenance
- Wife Maintenance