Gan Guo Bin

Gan Guo Bin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and family law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Spousal Support	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Bin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gan Guo Bin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Winston Quek & Company	4 cases	67% of cases	XEW v XEV: Habitual Residence and Jurisdiction in Singapore Divorce Proceedings(Jan 2025) Hiap Seng v Hock Heng: SOPA, Payment Response Validity & Estoppel in Construction Dispute(Feb 2024) Ramo Industries v DLE Solutions: Structural Steel Contract Dispute(Jan 2020)
Messrs Winston Quek & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Fu Yuan Construction v Fab-5: Striking Out & Setting Aside Applications Under SOPA(Feb 2021)
Winston Quek & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	TND v TNC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Access Orders Appeal(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gan Guo Bin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gan Guo Bin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	4(67%)	67%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,628,582.43	2,407,145.614 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	XEW v XEV: Habitual Residence and Jurisdiction in Singapore Divorce Proceedings 21 Jan 2025 XEV (Respondent)Won	21 Jan 2025	XEV (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; parties to file submissions on costs within 14 days if they are unable to agree on costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Hiap Seng v Hock Heng: SOPA, Payment Response Validity & Estoppel in Construction Dispute 26 Feb 2024 Hock Heng Seng Contractor Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	26 Feb 2024	Hock Heng Seng Contractor Pte Ltd (Respondent): Adjudicated Amount ReducedThe adjudicated amount was reduced from S$17,019.19 to S$16,861.60. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Fu Yuan Construction v Fab-5: Striking Out & Setting Aside Applications Under SOPA 01 Feb 2021 Fu Yuan Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Feb 2021	Fu Yuan Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application in SUM 5045 to strike out the defendant's application was dismissed.
4	Ramo Industries v DLE Solutions: Structural Steel Contract Dispute 06 Jan 2020 DLE Solutions Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	06 Jan 2020	DLE Solutions Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partThe court allowed DLE's counterclaim for retention monies, to be set off against Ramo's claim. The court dismissed DLE's counterclaim for the value of bolts supplied.
5	UZO v UZP: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Wife Maintenance 18 Dec 2019 UZP (Defendant)Partial	18 Dec 2019	UZP (Defendant): PartialThe husband was ordered to transfer $212,410.91 to the wife and pay monthly maintenance. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	TND v TNC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Access Orders Appeal 26 Apr 2017 TND (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	26 Apr 2017	TND (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe husband is to transfer to the wife money and/or assets equivalent to $9,611,720.83 in value within six months of this judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.