Standard Chartered Bank

Standard Chartered Bank is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 40 counsels. Through 13 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 11 complex cases, representing 44.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Standard Chartered Bank has been represented by 13 law firms and 40 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Toh Kian Sing Lynette Koh Tan Yew Beng David Steven Lau
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Mak Sushan Melissa Tan Xeauwei Daniel Seow Wei Jin Melissa Mak Marrissa Miralini Karuna Daniel Seow Marrissa Karuna
Lee & Lee	1 case	Jiang Ke-Yue Gan Theng Chong Loo Ngan Chor
Lee and Lee	1 case	Quek Mong Hua Gan Theng Chong Michael Kuah Mervyn Foo
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Chu Hua Yi Herman Jeremiah Wong Wai Han
Wong Partnership	1 case	Ong Pei Chin Andre Maniam
Rajah and Tann	2 cases	Toh Kian Sing Ian Teo
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Danny Ong Yam Wern-Jhien Jonathan Lee Mohammed Reza Patrick Ang Alina Chia Mohamed Reza Chin Wei Lin
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Timothy Ang Wei Kiat
Rodyk & Davidson	1 case	Herman Jeremiah Wong Wai Han Choo Hua Yi
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	James Low Hri Kumar SC Hri Kumar James Loh
Shook Lin & Bok	1 case	Dylan Lee
William Lai & Alan Wong	1 case	Meat Kaur

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Standard Chartered Bank's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 11 (44.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	20.0%
Neutral	212.0 parties avg	12.0	8.0%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	8.0%
Won	153.5 parties avg	3.5	60.0%
	124.0 parties avg	24.0	4.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2021	124.0 parties avg	24.0
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Standard Chartered Bank's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(20.0%)	20.0%
Neutral	2(8.0%)	8.0%
Partial	2(8.0%)	8.0%
Won	15(60.0%)	60.0%
	1(4.0%)	4.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	139,862,222.75	9,990,158.7714 cases	14
USD	1,961,430.67	1,961,430.671 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2011	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2010	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghc-58 03 Mar 2024	03 Mar 2024	Other	NeutralStandard Chartered Bank was present as a creditor.
2	2021-sghc-34 15 Feb 2021	15 Feb 2021	Defendant	Unknown
3	2020-sghci-19 30 Aug 2020	30 Aug 2020	Defendant	WonDefendants' legal fees of S$1,100,000 to be borne by Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2020-sgcai-3 12 Jul 2020	12 Jul 2020	Respondent, Defendant	WonAppeal dismissed; appellants ordered to pay SCB’s costs fixed at S$80,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2019-sghci-15 13 Oct 2019	13 Oct 2019	Defendant	WonThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing all claims.
6	2018-sghc-60 15 Mar 2018	15 Mar 2018	Defendant	NeutralShare of sales proceeds determined by the rolling charge method. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
7	2012-sgca-38 25 Jul 2012	25 Jul 2012	Respondent	WonAppeal against the bank was dismissed with costs.
8	2012-sghc-5 08 Jan 2012	08 Jan 2012	Defendant, Respondent	WonCosts of $4,500 awarded to the defendant on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	2011-sghc-154 16 Jun 2011	16 Jun 2011	Defendant	WonDefendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application for pre-action discovery. Costs were fixed at $8,000 on an indemnity basis (exclusive of reasonable disbursements) pursuant to Order 24 Rule 6(9) of the Rules of Court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2011-sghc-89 10 Apr 2011	10 Apr 2011	Respondent, Plaintiff	WonSummary judgment granted in favour of the Plaintiff for S$133,478,558.52 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	2010-sghc-276 16 Sep 2010	16 Sep 2010	Defendant, Respondent	WonAppeal allowed; plaintiffs to pay the defendant’s costs of the appeal, such costs to be taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	2010-sghc-119 21 Apr 2010	21 Apr 2010	Defendant	LostThe defendant was found liable for wrongful dismissal, but the damages were limited. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	2010-sgca-2 28 Jan 2010	28 Jan 2010	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the court found in favor of the appellant. Costs to be borne by each party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	2009-sghc-194 26 Aug 2009	26 Aug 2009	Defendant	PartialApplication granted with directions for the exchange of electronic copies of documents and subsequent inspection.
15	2007-sgca-4 28 Jan 2007	28 Jan 2007	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed with costs to the appellants.
16	2006-sghc-90 29 May 2006	29 May 2006	Respondent	PartialAppeal upheld in part regarding losses from the forced sale of 179 Syed Alwi Road.
17	2005-sghc-220 28 Nov 2005	28 Nov 2005	Respondent, Plaintiff	WonSummary judgment granted for US$1,961,430.67 together with interest and costs.
18	2005-sghc-71 13 Apr 2005	13 Apr 2005	Respondent, Plaintiff	LostApplication by Standard Chartered Bank dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	2005-sghc-43 27 Feb 2005	27 Feb 2005	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiff for the principal sum of $1.5 million and outstanding interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	2004-sghc-258 17 Nov 2004	17 Nov 2004	Defendant	LostThe court found that the bank had no caveatable interest in the properties for the cancellation and legal fees and allowed the applications, directing an inquiry into damages sustained by the plaintiffs due to the bank's refusal to withdraw the caveats.
21	2003-sghc-181 22 Aug 2003	22 Aug 2003	Plaintiff	WonAppeal by the defendants was dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis.
22	2003-sghc-98 27 Apr 2003	27 Apr 2003	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff for the sum of $3,691,164.23, plus interest at the contractual rate, plus costs on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	2002-sgca-53 09 Dec 2002	09 Dec 2002	Respondent	LostThe appeal was allowed, and the judgment in their favor was set aside.
24	2002-sghc-54 24 Mar 2002	24 Mar 2002	Respondent, Defendant	WonThe defendant successfully defended the appeal, with the court ruling in their favor.
25	2000-sghc-205 05 Oct 2000	05 Oct 2000	Respondent	WonThe Bank's appeal against the decision to set aside the Statutory Demand was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.