Ong Wui Swoon
Ong Wui Swoon is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 42.9% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Ong Wui Swoon has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Clifford Law LLP | 1 case |
Tan & Au LLP | 1 case |
Independent Practitioner | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ong Wui Swoon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.4
- Complex Cases
- 3 (42.9%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 34.3 parties avg |
Neutral | 22.0 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 15.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 15.0 parties avg |
2019 | 13.0 parties avg |
2016 | 12.0 parties avg |
2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
2009 | 15.0 parties avg |
2008 | 15.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ong Wui Swoon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(42.9%) |
Neutral | 2(28.6%) |
Partial | 1(14.3%) |
Won | 1(14.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 166.673 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2016 | 1 1 |
2014 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
2009 | 1 1 |
2008 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
14 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed. |
07 Nov 2019 | Respondent | LostCounterclaim for $20,000 dismissed. |
20 Mar 2016 | Defendant | NeutralMdm Ong opposed the application. |
06 Aug 2014 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Sister's appeal (RA 72/2014) was partially allowed. The court set aside AR Khng’s decision to allow the Brother an extension of time to appeal against AR Leong’s substantive decision, but allowed the extension of time to appeal against AR Leong’s costs order to remain. No costs were awarded. |
29 Oct 2012 | Plaintiff | NeutralInquiry ordered before the Registrar of the Supreme Court to determine the total number of shares owned by the Estate and the value of all the Estate’s assets. |
03 Mar 2009 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the Appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
13 May 2008 | Applicant, Plaintiff | LostApplication for extension of time to serve notice of appeal was dismissed with costs fixed at $500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |