Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment
In Singapore International Commercial Court Suit No 4 of 2019 (Assessment of Damages 1 of 2022), Singapore Airlines Limited sued CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc for breach of contract after CSDS failed to purchase a Boeing 777-212 aircraft. The court, presided over by Jeremy Lionel Cooke IJ, found CSDS in repudiatory breach and assessed damages based on the difference between the contract price and the market value of the aircraft, plus related expenses. The court ruled in favor of Singapore Airlines, awarding damages and interest.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT1.2 Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Assessment of damages after CSDS Aircraft breached a contract to purchase an aircraft from Singapore Airlines. The court determined the market value and awarded damages.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc | Defendant | Corporation | Judgment Against Defendant | Lost | |
Singapore Airlines Limited | Plaintiff | Corporation | Judgment for Plaintiff | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Jeremy Lionel Cooke | International Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Singapore Airlines agreed to sell a Boeing 777-212 aircraft to CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc.
- The Aircraft Purchase Agreement was dated 19 September 2018.
- The agreed purchase price was US$6,500,000.
- CSDS paid a deposit of US$250,000 but failed to pay the remaining balance.
- Singapore Airlines terminated the contract on 4 November 2018 due to CSDS's breach.
- Singapore Airlines attempted to sell the aircraft but received no viable offers.
- The aircraft was eventually parted out in October 2021.
5. Formal Citations
- Singapore Airlines Ltd v CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc, Suit No 4 of 2019 (Assessment of Damages 1 of 2022), [2022] SGHC(I) 15
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Aircraft Purchase Agreement dated | |
Defendant in repudiatory breach of contract | |
Plaintiff accepted breach, contract ended | |
Plaintiff issued Requests for Proposals | |
Plaintiff issued further RFP | |
Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore grounded all Boeing 737 Max aircraft in Singapore | |
Plaintiff placed public advertisements for the sale of the Aircraft | |
Plaintiff decided not to proceed with the deployment of the Aircraft to SilkAir | |
Without prejudice negotiations took place with the defendant | |
Plaintiff decided to part out the Aircraft | |
Aircraft was parted out | |
Hearing date | |
Hearing date | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found the defendant in repudiatory breach of contract.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Repudiatory Breach
- Failure to Pay
- Assessment of Damages
- Outcome: The court assessed damages based on the difference between the contract price and the market value of the aircraft, plus related expenses.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Market Value Determination
- Reasonable Time for Substitute Sale
- Mitigation of Damages
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
- Difference in contract price and market price
- Parking and maintenance fees
- Marketing, brokerage and legal costs
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Aviation
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore Airlines Ltd v CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc | Singapore International Commercial Court | Yes | [2021] 5 SLR 26 | Singapore | The judgment establishes the defendant's liability for breach of contract, which is the basis for the subsequent assessment of damages. |
CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2022] 1 SLR 284 | Singapore | The judgment confirms the repudiatory breach of contract by the defendant, upholding the initial judgment. |
AerCap Partners I Ltd v Avia Asset Management AB | High Court of Justice | Yes | [2010] EWHC 2431 (Comm) | England and Wales | Cited for the principle that a seller is entitled to a reasonable time to enter into a substitute sale to determine the market price for assessing damages. |
The Golden Victory | House of Lords | Yes | [2007] 2 AC 353 | United Kingdom | Cited in support of the principle that a seller is entitled to a reasonable time to enter into a substitute sale to determine the market price for assessing damages. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
English Sale of Goods Act 1979 | United Kingdom |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Aircraft Purchase Agreement
- Repudiatory Breach
- Assessment of Damages
- Market Value
- Reasonable Time
- Substitute Sale
- Airframe
- Parting Out
- Requests for Proposals
- Certificate of Airworthiness
15.2 Keywords
- breach of contract
- aircraft sale
- damages assessment
- market value
- aviation
- singapore airlines
- CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Damages Assessment | 95 |
Contract Law | 90 |
Breach of Contract | 85 |
Sale of Goods | 80 |
Aircraft Sales and Leasing | 75 |
Commercial Law | 70 |
Commercial Litigation | 60 |
Performance of Contract | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Commercial Law
- Aviation Law