Yong Manling Jasmine

Yong Manling Jasmine is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Aircraft Sales and Leasing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Aircraft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidators’ remuneration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yong Manling Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yong Manling Jasmine has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	6 cases	100% of cases	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Aircraft Valuation, Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment(Jun 2023) Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment(Nov 2022) CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Specific Performance, Breach of Contract, Contract Termination(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yong Manling Jasmine's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yong Manling Jasmine's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	170,000.00	56,666.673 cases	3
USD	4,760,000.00	4,760,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Aircraft Valuation, Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment 18 Jun 2023 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	18 Jun 2023	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CSDS ordered to pay costs to SIA fixed at $100,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment 02 Nov 2022 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant)Lost	02 Nov 2022	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $4,760,000 (assumed USD, as the contract was in USD).
3	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Specific Performance, Breach of Contract, Contract Termination 01 Mar 2022 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	01 Mar 2022	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $70,000 to SIA as costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	AnAn Group v. VTB Bank: Arbitrability, Winding Up, and Liquidators' Remuneration 28 Nov 2021 VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	28 Nov 2021	VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; VTB Bank not liable for the liquidators' fees (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Ramo Industries v DLE Solutions: Structural Steel Contract Dispute 06 Jan 2020 Ramo Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Jan 2020	Ramo Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partThe court found DLE liable for the shortfall in steel, unpainted steel, improper fabrication, demurrage charges, and the delay issue. The quantum of damages will be assessed at a later stage.
6	Hyflux Ltd v SM Investments Pte Ltd: Striking Out Counterclaim & Summary Determination of Restructuring Agreement 02 Oct 2019 SM Investments Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	02 Oct 2019	SM Investments Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim can be raised as a defence without leave of Court. Leave is granted to pursue remedies beyond a pure defence, but no execution of any judgment is to occur without leave while the moratorium is in place.