Tan Teck San Kelvin

Tan Teck San Kelvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Aircraft Sales and Leasing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Aircraft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
General Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attendance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Teck San Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Teck San Kelvin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	8 cases	89% of cases	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Aircraft Valuation, Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment(Jun 2023) Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment(Nov 2022) CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Specific Performance, Breach of Contract, Contract Termination(Mar 2022)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	11% of cases	Khng Thian Huat v Riduan bin Yusof: Tenancy Dispute over Property Condition and Costs Allocation(Oct 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Teck San Kelvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	22%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	11%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Teck San Kelvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	6(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	378,340.00	63,056.676 cases	6
USD	4,760,000.00	4,760,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Aircraft Valuation, Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment 18 Jun 2023 Singapore Airlines Limited (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	18 Jun 2023	Singapore Airlines Limited (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; CSDS ordered to pay costs to SIA fixed at $100,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment 02 Nov 2022 Singapore Airlines Limited (Plaintiff)Won	02 Nov 2022	Singapore Airlines Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $4,760,000 (assumed USD, as the contract was in USD).
3	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines Ltd: Specific Performance, Breach of Contract, Contract Termination 01 Mar 2022 Singapore Airlines Limited (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	01 Mar 2022	Singapore Airlines Limited (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CSDS ordered to pay $70,000 to SIA as costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Yi Lin Cheryl v AIA Singapore: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Insurance Claim Denial 02 Dec 2021 AIA Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2021	AIA Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; awarded costs of $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tan Yi Lin Cheryl v AIA Singapore: Non-Disclosure & Misrepresentation in Life Insurance Claim 27 May 2021 AIA Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 May 2021	AIA Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, AIA Singapore Pte Ltd, and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
6	Goh Yng Yng Karen v Goh Yong Chiang Kelvin: Mental Capacity & Undue Influence in Power of Attorney 16 Sep 2020 Goh Yong Chiang Kelvin (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2020	Goh Yong Chiang Kelvin (Defendant): Declaration of Void Powers of AttorneyThe court declared the Powers of Attorney void due to Mdm Liew's lack of mental capacity and undue influence by the defendant.
7	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Pleadings, Rules of Court, Witness Attendance 15 Jul 2020 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jul 2020	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedPlaintiff's application for Further and Better Particulars and for bifurcation of the trial was granted. Costs to be assessed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Khng Thian Huat v Riduan bin Yusof: Tenancy Dispute over Property Condition and Costs Allocation 20 Oct 2004 Choy Mei Har (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Oct 2004	Choy Mei Har (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim for double rent dismissed; claim for damages and loss of usage allowed in part. Damages awarded in the sum of $79,170.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Flamelite v Lam Heng Chung: Copyright Infringement in Fire-Rated Glass Door Designs 14 Nov 2001 Glaverbel (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	14 Nov 2001	Glaverbel (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the High Court dismissing their claims against the defendants for breaches of copyright in certain artistic works was dismissed.