Ang Leong Hao

Ang Leong Hao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 55% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated expertise across 87 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigant-in-person	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Committal Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalty Doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of fact in loans of money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discharge of Counsel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Seizure of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ang Leong Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ang Leong Hao has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	21 cases	95% of cases	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt(Feb 2024) Affert Resources v Industries Chimiques: Extension of Time for Expert Affidavit on Senegalese Law(Oct 2023) ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction(Oct 2023)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	5% of cases	Werner Samuel Vuillemin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Striking Out Claim Appeal(Apr 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ang Leong Hao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.2
Complex Cases: 12 (55%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	55.1 parties avg	5.1	23%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Partial	43.8 parties avg	3.8	18%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	5%
Won	117.5 parties avg	7.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	35.4 parties avg	5.4
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	212.5 parties avg	12.5
2019	38.4 parties avg	8.4
2020	25.7 parties avg	5.7
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2023	63.8 parties avg	3.8
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ang Leong Hao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(23%)	23%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	4(18%)	18%
Unknown	1(5%)	5%
Won	11(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	121,000.00	11,000.0011 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	3 111	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Unknown: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	6 1131	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 3 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt 27 Feb 2024 Affert Resources Pte Ltd (in court compulsory winding up) (Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2024	Affert Resources Pte Ltd (in court compulsory winding up) (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application to unwind the effects of a transaction that was allegedly at an undervalue was dismissed.
2	Affert Resources v Industries Chimiques: Extension of Time for Expert Affidavit on Senegalese Law 25 Oct 2023 Affert Resources Pte Ltd (in court compulsory winding up) (Applicant, Appellant)Partial	25 Oct 2023	Affert Resources Pte Ltd (in court compulsory winding up) (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in relation to the extension of time to file the expert affidavit.
3	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction 03 Oct 2023 ILC Co, Ltd (Applicant)Lost	03 Oct 2023	ILC Co, Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedCommittal application against the 3rd and 4th respondents was dismissed. Costs in the sum of $4,000 each, plus reasonable disbursements, were awarded to the 3rd and 4th defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	ILC Co Ltd v Saitama Hiroshi: Application for Leave to Commence Committal Proceedings for Breach of Mareva Injunction 31 Jul 2023 ILC Co, Ltd (Applicant)Won	31 Jul 2023	ILC Co, Ltd (Applicant): Leave to commence committal proceedings grantedLeave granted to commence committal proceedings against all respondents.
5	Hadian v Ramachandran: Review of Bankrupt's Monthly & Target Contribution 01 May 2023 Mirmohammadali Hadian (Claimant, Applicant)Neutral	01 May 2023	Mirmohammadali Hadian (Claimant, Applicant): Application not orderedNo order made as to the application; Official Assignee directed to conduct a new determination if certain conditions are met (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	CSO v CSP: Without Prejudice Privilege & Admissibility of Evidence in Settlement Negotiations 07 Feb 2023 CSO (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	07 Feb 2023	CSO (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in partAppeal dismissed, with limitations on the portions of disputed emails that the first defendant could refer to.
7	Ethoz Capital Ltd v Im8ex Pte Ltd: Penalty Doctrine, Misrepresentation, and Mortgage Redemption 19 Jan 2023 Ethoz Capital Ltd (Appellant)Partial	19 Jan 2023	Ethoz Capital Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, but the main part of the Judge’s findings that the payment of the Total Interest upon default and the Default Interest, were unenforceable penalties was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services 08 Feb 2022 Ding Pei Chai (Respondent, Defendant)Won	08 Feb 2022	Ding Pei Chai (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment in favour of RespondentChoo is to pay costs of $45,000 to Ding inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Application for Transfer of Appeal on Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Jan 2022 Ding Pei Chai (Respondent)Won	24 Jan 2022	Ding Pei Chai (Respondent): Successful resistance of applicationThe respondent successfully resisted the applicant's application to transfer the appeal.
10	Ethoz Capital Ltd v Im8ex Pte Ltd: Penalty Clauses, Misrepresentation & Mortgage Redemption 20 Jan 2022 Ethoz Capital Ltd (Applicant)Lost	20 Jan 2022	Ethoz Capital Ltd (Applicant): Judgment at first instance set asideJudgment at first instance in favour of Ethoz Capital Ltd was set aside.
11	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Contract Formation & Illegality 28 Jun 2021 Ding Pei Chai (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Won	28 Jun 2021	Ding Pei Chai (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for repayment of loans allowed; Mr Choo ordered to repay S$24,000 with interest.
12	Viking Engineering v. Feen: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 26 Apr 2020 Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2020	Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen (Defendant, Plaintiff): Originating Summons dismissedOriginating Summons filed by the defendants was dismissed. The purchase price of the shares was set in accordance with the valuation determined in the Report. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Chain Land Elevator Corp v FB Industries: Writ of Seizure and Sale on Joint Tenancy 06 Jan 2020 Lee Buck Huang (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	06 Jan 2020	Lee Buck Huang (Defendant, Applicant): Summons dismissedSummons to set aside the writ of seizure and sale was dismissed.
14	Kok Yin Chong v Lim Hun Joo: Collective Sale Dispute over Goodluck Garden 29 Apr 2019 Lim Hun Joo (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2019	Lim Hun Joo (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; parties to pay their own costs for the proceedings in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Werner Samuel Vuillemin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Striking Out Claim Appeal 01 Apr 2019 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent)Won	01 Apr 2019	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent): Successful DefenceOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $2,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Lee Chen Seong Jeremy v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Seizure Order under Criminal Procedure Code 28 Feb 2019 Lee Chen Seong Jeremy (Petitioner)Won	28 Feb 2019	Lee Chen Seong Jeremy (Petitioner): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, and the property was ordered to be released to the petitioner.
17	Lim Hun Joo v Kok Yin Chong: Collective Sale of Goodluck Garden - Land Titles (Strata) Act 25 Nov 2018 Lim Hun Joo (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2018	Lim Hun Joo (Plaintiff): Application GrantedOrder granted for the collective sale of the property.
18	Vuillemin v Overseas-Chinese Banking Corp: Recusal Application & Anton Piller Order Appeal 19 Apr 2018 Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2018	Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Recusal Summons DismissedThe application for the judge to recuse himself was dismissed.
19	Werner Samuel Vuillemin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Appeal Extension & Security for Costs 29 Nov 2016 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2016	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant): Successful Resistance of ApplicationSuccessfully resisted the plaintiff's application for an extension of time to appeal against the Appeal Dismissal Order.
20	Muthukumaran v Kwong: Implied Easement & Land Titles Act Dispute 13 Dec 2015 KWONG KAI CHUNG (Respondent)Won	13 Dec 2015	KWONG KAI CHUNG (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	AKN v ALC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 26 Nov 2015 AKN (Appellant)	26 Nov 2015	AKN (Appellant): -
22	AKN v ALC: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 30 Mar 2015 AKN (Appellant)Partial	30 Mar 2015	AKN (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with portions of the award set aside.