Europ Assistance Holding SA v ONB Technologies Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed

Europ Assistance Holding SA applied to the General Division of the High Court of Singapore to wind up ONB Technologies Pte Ltd. ONB Holdings Pte Ltd, as a contributory of ONB Technologies Pte Ltd, opposed the application. The court, presided over by Goh Yihan JC, dismissed the application on 21 June 2023, finding that Europ Assistance Holding SA failed to prove that ONB Technologies Pte Ltd was unable to pay its debts under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018. The court provided detailed grounds of decision on 16 August 2023.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Winding up application dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Winding up application dismissed as Europ Assistance Holding SA failed to prove ONB Technologies Pte Ltd was unable to pay its debts.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Europ Assistance Holding SAClaimantCorporationApplication DismissedLostFoo Maw Shen, Chu Hua Yi, Lee Yibin Leonard
ONB Technologies Pte LtdDefendantCorporationApplication DismissedWon
ONB Holdings Pte LtdNon-partyCorporationCosts AwardedWonLim Wei Ming Keith

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Goh YihanJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Foo Maw ShenFC Legal Asia LLC
Chu Hua YiFC Legal Asia LLC
Lee Yibin LeonardFC Legal Asia LLC
Lim Wei Ming KeithQuahe Woo & Palmer LLC
Beverly WeeMinistry of Law (IPTO)

4. Facts

  1. Europ Assistance Holding SA applied to wind up ONB Technologies Pte Ltd.
  2. ONB Holdings Pte Ltd opposed the winding up application as a contributory of ONB Technologies Pte Ltd.
  3. Europ Assistance Holding SA relied on s 125(2)(c) of the IRDA, arguing ONB Technologies Pte Ltd was unable to pay its debts.
  4. Europ Assistance Holding SA claimed ONB Technologies Pte Ltd's managing director stated the company would be cash flow insolvent.
  5. ONB Technologies Pte Ltd stated in a letter that its cash position was insufficient to meet January 2022 payments.
  6. A board meeting was convened to discuss the insolvency of ONB Technologies Pte Ltd.
  7. The OCLA contains an arbitration clause.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Europ Assistance Holding SA v ONB Technologies Pte Ltd, Companies Winding Up No 60 of 2023, [2023] SGHC 226

6. Timeline

DateEvent
ONB Technologies Pte Ltd incorporated in Singapore
Shareholders’ agreement between Europ Assistance Holding SA and ONB Holdings Pte Ltd dated
Praveen Surendiran became managing director of ONB Technologies Pte Ltd
Optionally convertible loan agreement dated
ONB Technologies Pte Ltd stated in a letter that its cash position was insufficient
Board meeting convened to discuss the insolvency of ONB Technologies Pte Ltd
Loan Principal plus interest due
Europ Assistance Holding SA gave formal notice to ONB Technologies Pte Ltd requesting immediate repayment of the Debt
Winding up application filed
High Court granted permission for ONB Holdings Pte Ltd to file an affidavit to oppose the claimant’s application
Parties heard
Claimant’s application dismissed
Claimant appealed against the decision
Detailed grounds of decision provided

7. Legal Issues

  1. Inability to Pay Debts
    • Outcome: The court found that the claimant failed to prove that the defendant was unable to pay its debts.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2021] 2 SLR 478
  2. Standing to Oppose Winding Up Application
    • Outcome: The court held that ONB Holdings Pte Ltd had standing to oppose the winding up application in its capacity as a contributory of the defendant.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2023] 3 SLR 900
  3. Applicability of Arbitration Clause
    • Outcome: The court found that the parties’ dispute over the Debt was subject to an arbitration clause, and the claimant had not shown why the winding up application should be stayed instead of dismissed.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2020] 1 SLR 1158
      • [2011] 3 SLR 414

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Winding up of ONB Technologies Pte Ltd

9. Cause of Actions

  • Winding up application

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Insolvency Law
  • Arbitration

11. Industries

  • Technology

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Atlas Equifin Pte Ltd v Electronic Cash and Payment Solutions (S) Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2023] 3 SLR 900SingaporeCited for the principle that a contributory has standing to oppose a winding up application and the factors a court considers in deciding whether to allow the challenge.
Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2007] 2 SLR(R) 268SingaporeCited for the principle that the burden lies on the claimant to establish a ground for winding up because of the drastic consequences that a winding up application has on a company.
Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd v RCMA Asia Pte Ltd (formerly known as Tong Teik Pte Ltd)Court of AppealYes[2021] 2 SLR 478SingaporeCited for the principle that the cash flow test is the sole test of solvency, that is, whether the company’s current assets exceed its current liabilities such that it can meet all its debts as and when they fall due.
Re Boey Hong Khim and another, ex parte Medical Equipment Credit Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[1998] 1 SLR(R) 956SingaporeCited for the principle that the petitioning creditor cannot short-circuit the requirement of proof of inability to pay debts by a bare allegation.
Greenline-Onyx Envirotech Phils, Inc v Otto Systems Singapore Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2007] 3 SLR(R) 40SingaporeCited for the principle that an admission, such as in the context of a debt, requires “clear words of admission”.
Fustar Chemicals Ltd (Hong Kong) v Liquidator of Fustar Chemicals Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2009] 4 SLR(R) 458SingaporeCited as an example of clear words of admission, such as a consistent acknowledgment in audited accounts or through audit confirmation statements.
AnAn Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd v VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Co)Court of AppealYes[2020] 1 SLR 1158SingaporeCited for the test to be satisfied when a court is faced with either a disputed debt or a cross-claim that is subject to an arbitration agreement.
Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore)Court of AppealYes[2011] 3 SLR 414SingaporeCited for the “generous approach towards the construction of the scope of arbitration clauses”.
Founder Group (Hong Kong) Ltd (in liquidation) v Singapore JHC Co Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2023] SGHC 159SingaporeCited for the principle that even if a party fails to refer the dispute it raises to arbitration, it would not be an abuse of process for that party to rely on the arbitration clause subsequently.
Kon Yin Tong and another v Leow Boon Cher and othersHigh CourtYes[2011] SGHC 228SingaporeCited for the principle that the burden lies on the claimant to establish a ground for winding up, and not the other way around.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
Section 125(1)(e) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
Section 125(1)(c) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
Section 125(2)(c) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
Section 125(2)(a) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Winding up
  • Insolvency
  • Arbitration clause
  • Cash flow insolvency
  • Statutory demand
  • Contributory
  • Optionally convertible loan agreement
  • Debt
  • Cash flow documents
  • Shareholders’ agreement

15.2 Keywords

  • Winding up application
  • Insolvency
  • Arbitration
  • Singapore
  • ONB Technologies
  • Europ Assistance

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency Law
  • Winding up
  • Arbitration

17. Areas of Law

  • Insolvency Law
  • Winding up
  • Arbitration