Lim Wei Ming Keith

Lim Wei Ming Keith is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 56% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best effort obligations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Obligations imposed	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Ming Keith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wei Ming Keith has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	9 cases	100% of cases	Wong Joo Wan v Bravo Building Construction: Extension of Judicial Management Order and Statement of Proposals(May 2024) Europ Assistance Holding SA v ONB Technologies Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed(Aug 2023) Dways International v. Lim Seow Hui: Director's Duties, Conspiracy, Defamation in Nutritional Product Sales(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wei Ming Keith's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.9
Complex Cases: 5 (56%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Unknown	15.0 parties avg	5.0	11%
Won	48.6 parties avg	8.6	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	210.4 parties avg	10.4
2022	24.4 parties avg	4.4
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wei Ming Keith's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Unknown	1(11%)	11%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	76,000.00	15,200.005 cases	5
USD	42,952,356.91	21,476,178.462 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wong Joo Wan v Bravo Building Construction: Extension of Judicial Management Order and Statement of Proposals 12 May 2024 Aik Chuan Investment Pte Ltd (Other)	12 May 2024	Aik Chuan Investment Pte Ltd (Other): -
2	Europ Assistance Holding SA v ONB Technologies Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed 15 Aug 2023 ONB Holdings Pte Ltd (Non-party)Won	15 Aug 2023	ONB Holdings Pte Ltd (Non-party): Costs AwardedCosts of the application fixed at $7,000, payable by the claimant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Dways International v. Lim Seow Hui: Director's Duties, Conspiracy, Defamation in Nutritional Product Sales 05 Jul 2022 Chua Hong Chor (Defendant)Lost	05 Jul 2022	Chua Hong Chor (Defendant): Jointly and severally liable for $30,000Jointly and severally liable for $30,000 on the Loan.
4	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Effort Obligations in Loan Repayment Dispute 09 Jan 2022 CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	09 Jan 2022	CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; all outstanding amounts under the Loan Agreement are due and payable. The court assumed USD as the loan was extended in USD.
5	Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest 19 Aug 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs order below is reversed in favor of the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Ace Class Precision Engineering Pte Ltd v Tan Boon Hwa: Liquidator Removal & Property Delivery Dispute 02 Jun 2021 Liquidators of Apex Precision Engineering Pte Ltd (In Members’ Voluntary Liquidation) (Applicant)Won	02 Jun 2021	Liquidators of Apex Precision Engineering Pte Ltd (In Members’ Voluntary Liquidation) (Applicant): Application GrantedLiquidators' application for the respondents to comply with the October 2020 Orders was granted. The respondents were ordered to pay the liquidators costs fixed at $3,000 (plus disbursements) in respect of SUM 310, SUM 303 and SUM 330. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause 03 Mar 2020 CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	03 Mar 2020	CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for stay of proceedings granted in partThe court ordered a stay in relation to all matters other than the clause 2(c) issues.
8	Public Prosecutor v Sulaiman bin Jumari: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Sep 2019 Sulaiman bin Jumari (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2019	Sulaiman bin Jumari (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted of possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
9	Phillips 66 v Star Quest: Bills of Lading & Title in Bunker Supply Contracts after OW Bunker Insolvency 19 May 2016 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Respondent)Won	19 May 2016	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Respondent): Leave to Defend GrantedUnconditional leave to defend granted. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.