Foo Maw Shen

Foo Maw Shen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 46 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and trust law. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 27 complex cases, representing 59% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated expertise across 155 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	32 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 32 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	22 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	13 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	12 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	12 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	9 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting Irregularities	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gaming Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moratoria	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deed Poll Structure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Conveyance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidators	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Provisional liquidators	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Video Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied authority of agent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best commercial endeavours	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Chance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency by estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Manipulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Window Dressing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Portfolio Pumping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Options	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wagering Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Endeavours Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares Allotment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Company	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recycling Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance of breach of trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traceable proceeds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Betting Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gaming contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeovers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominee Director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-judgment interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvent Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Maw Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Maw Shen has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	13 cases	28% of cases	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute(Jul 2016) JES International v Yang Shushan: Breach of Contract, Agency by Estoppel, Damages(Apr 2016) Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Private Equity Investments & Accounting(Jul 2015)
FC Legal Asia LLC	9 cases	20% of cases	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment Interest(Oct 2024) Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over US$10 Million Bond Account & Contingent Claims(Aug 2024) Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims(May 2024)
Ang & Partners	8 cases	17% of cases	Transnational Recycling v Semac: Breach of Contract & Termination Dispute(Jun 2003) Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance(Aug 2002) Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contracts under Singapore Civil Law Act(Feb 2002)
Yeo Wee Kiong Law Corporation	8 cases	17% of cases	Pacific Recreation v S Y Technology: Enforceability of Indemnity Deed & Choice of Law(Jan 2008) Wu Yang v Mao Yong Hui: Mareva Injunctions, Shares Allotment & Companies Act Breach(Dec 2007) Public Prosecutor v Low Kok Heng: Bankruptcy Offence, Innocent Intention Defence & Statutory Interpretation(Jul 2007)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	7 cases	15% of cases	Tan Bee Hong Blossom v Tan Seng Keow Doreen: Winding Up & Family Business Dispute(Apr 2020) Cheong Chee Hwa v. China Star Food Group: Breach of Contract & Best Endeavours in Reverse Takeover(Mar 2019) MSP4GE Asia v MSP Global: Constructive Trust, Breach of Trust & Misrepresentation(Jan 2019)
Yeo Wee Kiong Law Corp	1 cases	2% of cases	Re Econ Corp Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Approval Dispute(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Maw Shen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.5
Complex Cases: 27 (59%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	184.5 parties avg	4.5	39%
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	4%
Partial	66.4 parties avg	6.4	13%
Won	208.1 parties avg	8.1	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	48.0 parties avg	8.0
2002	318.4 parties avg	18.4
2003	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	44.3 parties avg	4.3
2008	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2009	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	46.3 parties avg	6.3
2019	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2023	55.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	43.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Maw Shen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	18(39%)	39%
Neutral	2(4%)	4%
Partial	6(13%)	13%
Won	20(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	125,617,485.60	5,234,061.9024 cases	24
USD	22,123,999.97	5,530,999.994 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2008	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2024	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 46 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment Interest 17 Oct 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Partial	17 Oct 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Partial WinTIL was awarded $790,500 in costs and disbursements, but pre-judgment interest was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over US$10 Million Bond Account & Contingent Claims 19 Aug 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Won	19 Aug 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantJudgment for the Claimant; the court ordered the closure of the bond account and the return of the funds to the claimant (assumed USD, as the bond amount was deposited in USD).
3	Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims 07 May 2024 Peck Wee Boon Patrick (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2024	Peck Wee Boon Patrick (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims against the defendants were dismissed.
4	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cross-Border Dispute 28 Apr 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Lost	28 Apr 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Application for further security for costs grantedTranspac Investments Limited must provide security for costs in favour of TIH in the sum claimed ie, $500,000 by 15 May 2024 by way of a solicitor’s undertaking or otherwise in a form reasonably satisfactory to TIH. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Babel Holding Ltd Scheme of Arrangement: Leave to Convene Meeting, Creditor Classification 23 Nov 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Non-party)Lost	23 Nov 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Non-party): Objections DismissedObjections to the application were dismissed.
6	Parastate Labs Inc v. Wang Li: Appeal on Quantum of Mareva Injunction for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 24 Sep 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Appellant, Claimant)Won	24 Sep 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Appellant, Claimant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; injunction granted shall cover assets of up to US$5 million.
7	Europ Assistance Holding SA v ONB Technologies Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed 15 Aug 2023 Europ Assistance Holding SA (Claimant)Lost	15 Aug 2023	Europ Assistance Holding SA (Claimant): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed; ordered to pay $7,000 in costs to ONB Holdings Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Mareva Injunction Quantum Dispute 25 May 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant)Partial	25 May 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant): Mareva injunction granted for a reduced quantumMareva injunction granted for US$2.5 million instead of the US$5 million sought.
9	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration 27 Feb 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant)Lost	27 Feb 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant): Case management stay grantedCase management stay of the action was granted pending the resolution of the arbitration between Parastate and Babel Asia.
10	Tan Bee Hong Blossom v Tan Seng Keow Doreen: Winding Up & Family Business Dispute 29 Apr 2020 Tan Bee Hong Blossom (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Apr 2020	Tan Bee Hong Blossom (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs’ action dismissed; ordered to pay costs to the Defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Cheong Chee Hwa v. China Star Food Group: Breach of Contract & Best Endeavours in Reverse Takeover 28 Mar 2019 Cheong Chee Hwa (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Mar 2019	Cheong Chee Hwa (Plaintiff): Action dismissedThe plaintiff's action was dismissed.
12	MSP4GE Asia v MSP Global: Constructive Trust, Breach of Trust & Misrepresentation 30 Jan 2019 Tony Antonius Lie (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2019	Tony Antonius Lie (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared that the Balance Sum in the amount of USD 479,233.60 is held by the 1st Defendant on trust for the 1st Plaintiff and ordered that the Balance Sum together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ be paid by the 1st Defendant to the 1st Plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default 27 Sep 2018 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2018	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed in part; the exact monetary amount will be determined after hearing parties on interest, costs, and the form of the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Accounting Phase 27 Sep 2018 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2018	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Judgment in favor of PlaintiffThe court held that the defendants are precluded from arguing that there was an overarching agreement for the plaintiffs to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Tongbao v Woon: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation in Joint Venture for Vessel Construction 22 Jul 2018 Tongbao Marine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jul 2018	Tongbao Marine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedEquitable compensation awarded in the amount of US$4,800,000 (converted to SGD at the prevailing exchange rate, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Bachmeer Capital v Ong Chih Ching: Video Link Evidence in International Commercial Dispute 12 Feb 2018 BACHMEER CAPITAL LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	12 Feb 2018	BACHMEER CAPITAL LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.
17	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute 12 Jul 2016 Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 Jul 2016	Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Wees are obliged to pay management fees for the initial private equity funds until 8 July 2012 (assumed USD, as the initial agreement was in USD).
18	JES International v Yang Shushan: Breach of Contract, Agency by Estoppel, Damages 04 Apr 2016 JES International Holdings Limited (Plaintiff)Won	04 Apr 2016	JES International Holdings Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages assessed in the sum of $2,088,600 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Private Equity Investments & Accounting 09 Jul 2015 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jul 2015	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffTransfer order, accounting order, and payment order granted.
20	Yong Kheng Leong v Panweld Trading: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Misappropriation of Funds 21 Oct 2012 Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2012	Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for Panweld Trading Pte Ltd; Yong Kheng Leong liable for $873,959.20 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Panweld Trading v Yong Kheng Leong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act 18 Mar 2012 Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Mar 2012	Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff against Mr. Yong for $873,959.20 and against Mdm Lim for $338,410 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Monetary Authority of Singapore v Tan Chong Koay: Market Rigging & False Trading in UET Shares 16 Sep 2010 Pheim Asset Management Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2010	Pheim Asset Management Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Civil Penalty ImposedCivil penalty of $250,000 imposed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Mühlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Validity & Infringement 22 Feb 2010 Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Respondent)Lost	22 Feb 2010	Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed and the respondent was ordered to pay costs.
24	Eng Gee Seng v Quek Choon Teck: Minority Oppression in Quasi-Partnership Duck Abattoir 17 Sep 2009 Goh Gok Siang (Defendant)Lost	17 Sep 2009	Goh Gok Siang (Defendant): Claim Against Defendant UpheldThe court ordered the 1st and 2nd Defendants to purchase the Plaintiff’s shares in the 3rd Defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
25	Muhlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity of Device for Inspecting Electronic Components 22 Feb 2009 Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2009	Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for invalidity and revocation of the plaintiff's patent was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Lim Eng Teck v Life Glow Asia Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Breach of Fiduciary Duties 05 Nov 2008 Lim Eng Teck (Plaintiff)Neutral	05 Nov 2008	Lim Eng Teck (Plaintiff): Winding up application to be heard after Suit 637 of 2008Winding up application to be heard immediately after Suit 637 of 2008 by the trial judge, but with liberty to restore should Suit 637 of 2008 not proceed for any reason.
27	MEA Environment v 800 Super Waste Management: Liquidated Damages & Penalty Clauses 21 Sep 2008 800 Super Waste Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2008	800 Super Waste Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for liquidated damages was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Desert Palace Inc v Poh Soon Kiat: Enforcing Foreign Judgments on Wagering Contracts 01 Sep 2008 Desert Palace Inc (doing business as Caesars Palace) (Plaintiff)Won	01 Sep 2008	Desert Palace Inc (doing business as Caesars Palace) (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and summary judgment granted for the plaintiff; costs of the appeal and that of the hearing below at $15,000 plus further costs of reasonable disbursements to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Tan Ging Hoon v MMI Holdings: Employee Share Options Dispute After Subsidiary Sale 13 Apr 2008 Ong Chuan Ho (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Apr 2008	Ong Chuan Ho (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Pacific Recreation v S Y Technology: Enforceability of Indemnity Deed & Choice of Law 15 Jan 2008 S Y Technology Inc (Respondent)Won	15 Jan 2008	S Y Technology Inc (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; appeals dismissed with costs. No monetary amount specified in judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Wu Yang v Mao Yong Hui: Mareva Injunctions, Shares Allotment & Companies Act Breach 12 Dec 2007 VGO Corporation Limited (Respondent)Won	12 Dec 2007	VGO Corporation Limited (Respondent): Variation Order UpheldVariation order upheld, excluding Escrow Shares from the freezing order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Public Prosecutor v Low Kok Heng: Bankruptcy Offence, Innocent Intention Defence & Statutory Interpretation 30 Jul 2007 Low Kok Heng (Respondent)Lost	30 Jul 2007	Low Kok Heng (Respondent): Convicted of all six charges under s 141(1)(a) of the ActThe respondent was convicted of all six charges under s 141(1)(a) of the Act.
33	Re Jiangshan Investment Consortium Ltd: Competing Claims for Dividend Payments in Winding Up 04 Jun 2007 Jiangshan Investment Consortium Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Neutral	04 Jun 2007	Jiangshan Investment Consortium Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): NeutralThe company, in liquidation, is a neutral party in the dispute.
34	S Y Technology Inc v Pacific Recreation: Choice of Law & Indemnity Enforcement 20 Mar 2007 S Y Technology Inc (Plaintiff)Won	20 Mar 2007	S Y Technology Inc (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$4,623,999.97. The court ordered the winding up of the defendant company.
35	Justlogin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Damages Assessment for Loss of Chance in iProp Asset Sale 19 Nov 2006 Justlogin Holding Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	19 Nov 2006	Justlogin Holding Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; damages of $1.53 million awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
36	Chong Hon Kuan Ivan v Levy Maurice: Case Management of Overlapping Actions 24 Jan 2005 Chang Hong Kaye Jimmy (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jan 2005	Chang Hong Kaye Jimmy (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal from the decision of the Assistant Registrar allowed on the terms herein.
37	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp v Justlogin: Breach of Contract & Nominee Director Duties 26 Apr 2004 Justlogin Holding Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Apr 2004	Justlogin Holding Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment UpheldJudgment in favour of Justlogin Holding Pte Ltd upheld; damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
38	Re Econ Corp Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Approval Dispute 23 Nov 2003 Econ Corporation Limited (Applicant)Lost	23 Nov 2003	Econ Corporation Limited (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for sanction of the scheme of arrangement was dismissed.
39	Transnational Recycling v Semac: Breach of Contract & Termination Dispute 17 Jun 2003 Transnational Recycling Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Jun 2003	Transnational Recycling Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedTransnational's claim for breach of contract and wrongful termination was dismissed.
40	Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance 29 Aug 2002 Huangpu Holdings International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Aug 2002	Huangpu Holdings International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contracts under Singapore Civil Law Act 24 Feb 2002 Star City Pty Ltd (fka Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) (Appellant)Lost	24 Feb 2002	Star City Pty Ltd (fka Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs.
42	Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Gambling Debts under Singapore Civil Law Act 24 Feb 2002 Star City Pty Limited (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Limited) (Appellant)Lost	24 Feb 2002	Star City Pty Limited (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Limited) (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court determined that the claim was essentially an action to recover money lost upon a wager, falling under Section 5(2) of the Civil Law Act and therefore unenforceable in Singapore. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud Creditors 30 Dec 2001 Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Dec 2001	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the First, Second, Third and Sixth Defendants for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	Tong Tien See Construction v Tong Tien See: Breach of Director's Duties & Shadow Director Liability 30 Dec 2001 Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Dec 2001	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the first, second, third, and sixth defendants for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means. Judgment against the first, second, and third defendants for $53.3 million due to breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the first, second, and third defendants were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. Judgment against the eighth and the twelfth defendants for a declaration that they held $984,899.60 as constructive trustees for the plaintiff company. Declaration that the seventh defendant received $7m from the plaintiff company as constructive trustees. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
45	Star City v Tan: Gaming Contract & Illegality under Civil Law Act 20 May 2001 Star City Pty Ltd (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	20 May 2001	Star City Pty Ltd (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for AUD 194,840 dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.
46	Chileon v Choong Wai Phwee: Trustees' Power to Sell Property & Equitable Estoppel 06 Mar 2001 Choong Wai Phwee and Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2001	Choong Wai Phwee and Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The deposit as security for costs, with interest, if any, is to be paid to the respondents or their solicitors to account of costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.