Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi

Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and injunctions. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts for sale and supply of goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legal Solutions LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye: Sham Agreements & Conspiracy in Matrimonial Asset Division(Dec 2024) Shandong Qixia v Yong Zeng Yuan: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duties(Mar 2022) Chen Mingxing v Zhang Jian: Interim Injunction for OEL Shares Dispute(Jan 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.7
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	29.0 parties avg	9.0	40%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Charmaine Elizabeth Ong Wan Qi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	412,353.70	206,176.852 cases	2
USD	1,572,142.00	1,572,142.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye: Sham Agreements & Conspiracy in Matrimonial Asset Division 29 Dec 2024 Tan Kian Chye (Defendant, Defendant in counterclaim)Neutral	29 Dec 2024	Tan Kian Chye (Defendant, Defendant in counterclaim): Claim DismissedThe claim against the defendant was dismissed.
2	Shandong Qixia v Yong Zeng Yuan: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duties 06 Mar 2022 Shandong Qixia Shida Fruits Refrigeration Co., Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	06 Mar 2022	Shandong Qixia Shida Fruits Refrigeration Co., Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$1,572,142. Interest awarded at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ until the date of judgment. Counterclaims dismissed. Assumed USD as the currency of the contract was in USD.
3	Chen Mingxing v Zhang Jian: Interim Injunction for OEL Shares Dispute 04 Jan 2021 Eminence Investment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Jan 2021	Eminence Investment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Interim injunction granted in partInterim injunction granted with a limitation as to its scope to 197,545,000 of the ordinary shares in OEL which were purchased from Mr Hing on or around 16 December 2019.
4	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation 04 Sep 2018 Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent)Partial	04 Sep 2018	Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; ordered to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements, and 60% of the appellant's costs below, assessed on a standard basis, to be taxed on the District Court scale if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Economic Loss 18 Jul 2018 Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent)Lost	18 Jul 2018	Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent): Liable for negligenceYap Tee Chuan is liable for negligence in the amount of $176,176.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).