Alterm Consortech v Public Prosecutor: Copyright Infringement in Termite Control Specifications

Alterm Consortech Pte Ltd, Chew Choon Ling Michael, and Teng Siew Chin appealed against their convictions in the Magistrate's Court for offences under the Copyright Act. The charges, brought by Cheng Wai Meng of Termi-mesh Singapore Pte Ltd, concerned alleged copyright infringement of termite control specifications and drawings. Choo Han Teck J of the High Court allowed the appeals, finding the charges flawed and dismissing the convictions. The court ordered that the fines be refunded.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeals allowed and convictions dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Alterm Consortech, Chew Choon Ling Michael, and Teng Siew Chin appealed convictions for copyright infringement related to termite control specifications. The High Court allowed the appeals, dismissing the convictions.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal UpheldLost
Alterm Consortech Pte LtdAppellantCorporationAppeal AllowedWon
Chew Choon Ling MichaelAppellantIndividualAppeal AllowedWon
Teng Siew ChinAppellantIndividualAppeal AllowedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Alterm Consortech, Chew Choon Ling Michael, and Teng Siew Chin were charged with copyright offences.
  2. The charges related to the Termi-mesh specification and markings on construction drawings.
  3. Cheng Wai Meng, managing director of Termi-mesh Singapore Pte Ltd, brought the charges.
  4. The appellants allegedly obtained the documents from architects and contractors.
  5. The specifications used by Alterm Consortech differed from those of Termi-mesh Singapore Pte Ltd.
  6. Teng Siew Chin was merely an employee with no proven involvement in the alleged offences.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Alterm Consortech Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor and other appeals, Magistrate's Appeals No 194, 195 and 196 of 2011, [2013] SGHC 189

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Complainant compared drawing P7 with specifications of TSPL, P4, discovering alleged breaches.
Magistrate's Appeals No 194, 195 and 196 of 2011 filed.
Judgment reserved.
High Court allowed the appeals and dismissed the convictions.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Copyright Infringement
    • Outcome: The court found the charges flawed and dismissed the convictions.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Fines
  2. Conviction

9. Cause of Actions

  • Copyright Infringement

10. Practice Areas

  • Copyright Infringement
  • Criminal Appeals

11. Industries

  • Pest Control

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Copyright Act (Cap 63, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Copyright Act
  • Termi-mesh
  • Specifications
  • Construction drawings
  • Copyright infringement
  • Termite control
  • Private summonses

15.2 Keywords

  • Copyright
  • Infringement
  • Termite control
  • Alterm Consortech
  • Public Prosecutor

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Copyrights90
Criminal Law10

16. Subjects

  • Copyright
  • Intellectual Property
  • Criminal Law