Leo Fernando

Leo Fernando is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The firm has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 9 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 19.4% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leo Fernando has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	30 cases	46.2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82.12% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 30 cases which represents 46.2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	7.7% of total caseload	General Practice22.14% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Theft	5 cases	7.7% of total caseload	General Practice28.33% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	6.2% of total caseload	General Practice27.50% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92.50% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3.1% of total caseload	Experienced57.50% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	3.1% of total caseload	General Practice37.50% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1.5% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Leo Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Leo Fernando has 9 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 19 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Keith Fernando	19 cases	52.8% of firm's cases	2021 sghc 48(Feb 2021) 2019 sgca 27(Apr 2019) 2019 sghc 14(Jan 2019)
Peter Fernando	9 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 255(Nov 2018) 2006 sghc 64(Apr 2006) 2005 sgca 1(Jan 2005)
Ramesh Tiwary	6 cases	16.7% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 123(Jun 2003) 2003 sghc 102(Apr 2003) 2002 sghc 153(Jul 2002)
Amarick Gill	2 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 7(Mar 2004) 2003 sghc 285(Nov 2003)
Raymond Lim Kuan Yew	1 cases	2.8% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 1(Jan 2004)
Lynette Sathiasingam	1 cases	2.8% of firm's cases	2000 sghc 87(May 2000)
Kavita Pandey	1 cases	2.8% of firm's cases	2019 sgca 27(Apr 2019)
Renuga Devi	1 cases	2.8% of firm's cases	2019 sgca 27(Apr 2019)
Troy Yeo Siew Chye	1 cases	2.8% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 60(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leo Fernando's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	262.3 parties avg	2.3	72.2%
Won	72.1 parties avg	2.1	19.4%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	8.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	92.6 parties avg	2.6
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leo Fernando's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	26(72.2%)	72.2%
Won	7(19.4%)	19.4%
Partial	3(8.3%)	8.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	76	10.867 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	081 81	Lost: 8 cases (9.9%) Won: 1 cases (1.2%)
2001	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2002	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2003	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)
2005	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)
2007	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2013	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	041 41	Lost: 4 cases (9.8%) Won: 1 cases (2.4%)
2019	02 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Leo Fernando in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Dinesh S/O RajantheranRespondent, Applicant Won (2)	Respondent, Applicant	2 cases	Won (2)
ZAINAL BIN HAMADAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
G Krishnasamy NaiduAppellant, Defendant Partial (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
Ismail bin Abdul RahmanAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Lim Beng SoonAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Boksenang bin BochekAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Sanjay KrishnanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
GCXAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Roger Yue JrDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ong Soon HengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chia Kee ChenDefense Lost (1)	Defense	1 case	Lost (1)
Masoud Rahimi bin MehrzadDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Victorine Noella WijeysinghaRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Ng Chee Tiong TonyAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Fernando Payagala Waduge Malitha KumarRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Vijayakumar s/o VeeriahAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Shanmugam s/o MurugesuAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Rupchand Bhojwani SunilAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Raman Selvam s/o RenganathanAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
R Sekhar s/o R G VanRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Toh Lam SengPetitioner, Appellant Lost (1)	Petitioner, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Sahadevan s/o GundanAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Heng Aik PengAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Goh Chye Soon JimmyAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Eng Poh Su (now known as Eddy Eng Poh Su)Petitioner, Applicant Partial (1)	Petitioner, Applicant	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Tiew GuayDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kwan Peng HongAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tay Beng Guan AlbertRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Jeyaretnam Joshua BenjaminDebtor, Appellant Won (1)	Debtor, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
P ShanmugamAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)