PP v Masoud Rahimi & Mogan Raj: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act
In Public Prosecutor v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and Mogan Raj Terapadisamy, the High Court of Singapore heard charges against Masoud Rahimi, a Singaporean, and Mogan Raj, a Malaysian, for offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Masoud was charged with possession of diamorphine and methamphetamine for trafficking, while Mogan was charged with trafficking diamorphine and methamphetamine by handing the drugs to Masoud. The court found both accused guilty. Masoud was sentenced to death on the capital charge, and Mogan was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Guilty verdict for both accused. Masoud Rahimi sentenced to death; Mogan Raj sentenced to imprisonment and caning.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Masoud Rahimi and Mogan Raj were charged with drug trafficking. The High Court found both guilty, with Masoud receiving the death penalty and Mogan imprisonment and caning.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Prosecution | Government Agency | Guilty verdict | Won | Andre Darius Jumabhoy of Attorney-General’s Chambers Kevin Tan Eu Shan of Attorney-General’s Chambers Qiu Huixiang of Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad | Defendant | Individual | Death sentence | Lost | |
Mogan Raj Terapadisamy | Defendant | Individual | Imprisonment and caning | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | J | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Andre Darius Jumabhoy | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Kevin Tan Eu Shan | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Qiu Huixiang | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Peter Keith Fernando | Leo Fernando |
Prasad s/o Karunakarn | K Prasad & Co |
Ram Goswami | Ram Goswami |
4. Facts
- Masoud and Mogan were arrested for drug-related offences on 20 May 2010.
- Mogan handed a black bundle to Masoud at Bishan MRT station in exchange for money.
- The bundle contained diamorphine and methamphetamine.
- Additional bundles of diamorphine were found in Masoud's car.
- Masoud initially denied knowledge of the drugs.
- Masoud later claimed he was part of a moneylending syndicate and was framed.
- Mogan claimed he did not know the bundles contained drugs.
5. Formal Citations
- Public Prosecutor v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and another, Criminal Case No 14 of 2013, [2015] SGHC 288
- Public Prosecutor v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and another, Criminal Appeal Nos 35 and 36 of 2015, [2016] SGCA 69
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Offences committed by Masoud and Mogan | |
Criminal Case No 14 of 2013 filed | |
Decision Date | |
Appeals dismissed by the Court of Appeal |
7. Legal Issues
- Drug Trafficking
- Outcome: The court found both accused guilty of drug trafficking.
- Category: Substantive
- Presumption of Knowledge of Drugs
- Outcome: The court found that Mogan failed to rebut the presumption under s 18(2) of the MDA.
- Category: Substantive
- Possession of Drugs for Trafficking
- Outcome: The court found that Masoud was in possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Criminal Prosecution
- Imprisonment
- Caning
- Death Penalty
9. Cause of Actions
- Drug Trafficking
- Possession of Drugs for the Purpose of Trafficking
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mohd Halmi bin Hamid and another v Public Prosecutor | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2006] 1 SLR(R) 548 | Singapore | Clarified that the presumptions in sections 17 and 18 of the Misuse of Drugs Act cannot be applied together. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Diamorphine
- Methamphetamine
- Drug Trafficking
- Misuse of Drugs Act
- Courier
- Presumption of Knowledge
- Moneylending Syndicate
15.2 Keywords
- drug trafficking
- diamorphine
- methamphetamine
- Singapore
- Misuse of Drugs Act
- criminal law
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act | 95 |
Criminal Law | 90 |
Drug Trafficking | 85 |
Evidence | 70 |
Sentencing | 65 |
Criminal Procedure | 60 |
Admissibility of evidence | 50 |
Penal Code | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Drug Offences