Alexander Choo Wei Wen

Alexander Choo Wei Wen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and winding up. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Delay	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disputed Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard of Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functions of judge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prima Facie	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Global Master Repurchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Alexander Choo Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alexander Choo Wei Wen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	8 cases	100% of cases	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Costs Dispute in Construction Delay Case(Aug 2023) Rex Lam Paki v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment on Admissions and Inherent Court Powers(Jul 2023) Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Building & Construction Delay, Loss of Chance, Damages(Feb 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alexander Choo Wei Wen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	45.2 parties avg	5.2	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alexander Choo Wei Wen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,808,748.46	972,678.357 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Costs Dispute in Construction Delay Case 02 Aug 2023 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	02 Aug 2023	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Unsuccessful party liable for costsJurong Primewide is the unsuccessful party and is liable for costs for both the first tranche and the second tranche of the trial. Total amount of costs and disbursements that JPW has to pay Crescendas for the first tranche and the second tranche of the trial as well as the interlocutory matters is $1,314,502.88 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Rex Lam Paki v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment on Admissions and Inherent Court Powers 03 Jul 2023 PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2023	PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs fixed at $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Building & Construction Delay, Loss of Chance, Damages 08 Feb 2023 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	08 Feb 2023	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part, found liable for $4,185,802.60 in net rental revenue loss and $1,061,285.86 in Holding Costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Governance 01 Dec 2022 PNG Sustainable Development Program Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	01 Dec 2022	PNG Sustainable Development Program Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of $80,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Damages for Delay in Biopolis 3 Construction 09 Aug 2021 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	09 Aug 2021	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): PartialThe defendant admits liability for a sum of $132,157.12 for the site staff expenses for its 161 days of delay (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	UWF v UWH: Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in Will Dispute 21 Dec 2020 UWH (Defendant)Won	21 Dec 2020	UWH (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendants' counterclaim allowed.
7	AnAn Group v. VTB Bank: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement 06 Apr 2020 VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	06 Apr 2020	VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Winding-up application dismissedWinding-up application dismissed. VTB is to pay the costs of the hearing below fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements and the costs of the appeal fixed at $70,000 inclusive of disbursements and such costs shall include the costs for CA/SUM 33/2019 and CA/SUM 89/2019. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	VTB Bank v Anan Group: Winding Up Application & Disputed Debt 18 Nov 2018 VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Plaintiff)Won	18 Nov 2018	VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffWinding up order made against the Defendant; costs of the proceedings to be paid to the Plaintiff out of the assets of the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).