Aqbal Singh

Aqbal Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restraint of trade and contractual terms. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 5% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aqbal Singh has demonstrated expertise across 75 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgment of Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wasted Expenditure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reliance Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Aesthetic Medicine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restrictive Covenant	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Advertising Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Severance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Supplemental Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aqbal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aqbal Singh has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	9 cases	45% of cases	CLAAS Medical Centre v Ng Boon Ching: Restraint of Trade, Third Party Rights(Jan 2010) Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition Clause Dispute(May 2009) Ng Boon Ching v Claas Medical Centre: Restraint of Trade & Third Party Rights(Mar 2009)
Pinnacle Law LLC	7 cases	35% of cases	ABN AMRO v 1050 Capital: Summary Judgment & Liquidation of Trading Portfolio(Oct 2015) Liten Logistics v ORG Powell: Land Sale Dispute over Compulsory Acquisition(Jul 2013) Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract & Remoteness of Damages in Beverage Distribution(Feb 2013)
Chan Ng Aqbal	3 cases	15% of cases	KCC v Anti Corrosion: Defective Paint Claim & Damages Assessment(Jun 2001) Public Prosecutor v Chang Ying Leong: Rape Charges & Consent(May 2001) Tang Dynasty City v Tan Seng Heng: Guarantee, Undertaking, and Theme Park Lease Dispute(Apr 2000)
Unilegal	1 cases	5% of cases	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Costs Thrown Away After Amendment of Pleadings(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aqbal Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 16.8
Complex Cases: 1 (5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	1319.8 parties avg	19.8	65%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Won	62.2 parties avg	2.2	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2007	228.8 parties avg	28.8
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aqbal Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(65%)	65%
Partial	1(5%)	5%
Won	6(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,101,236.02	443,827.2516 cases	16

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ABN AMRO v 1050 Capital: Summary Judgment & Liquidation of Trading Portfolio 19 Oct 2015 1050 CAPITAL PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	19 Oct 2015	1050 CAPITAL PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed; judgment against the defendant.Appeal dismissed; final judgment entered against the defendant for S$935,526.39 with interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Liten Logistics v ORG Powell: Land Sale Dispute over Compulsory Acquisition 22 Jul 2013 Liten Logistics Services Pte Ltd (Appellant, Vendor)Won	22 Jul 2013	Liten Logistics Services Pte Ltd (Appellant, Vendor): Appeal AllowedCivil Appeal No 44 of 2012 allowed.
3	Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract & Remoteness of Damages in Beverage Distribution 05 Feb 2013 Wanin Industries Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Feb 2013	Wanin Industries Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against Wanin Industries Pte Ltd was dismissed.
4	ORG Powell Packaging v Liten Logistics: Option to Purchase Dispute After Compulsory Land Acquisition 28 Oct 2012 Liten Logistics Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	28 Oct 2012	Liten Logistics Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders sought by Plaintiff declined in partThe court declined to grant orders declaring the purchase price for each property separately or declaring beneficial interest in the land acquisition award. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Smile Inc v Lui: Restraint of Trade, Employee Duty of Fidelity, Preparatory Competition 30 Jul 2012 Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	30 Jul 2012	Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Out of the Box v Wanin Industries: Assessment of Reliance Loss for Defective Drinks Supply 10 Oct 2011 Wanin Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Oct 2011	Wanin Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $655,280.70 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Rockeby Biomed Ltd v Alpha Advisory Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Securities and Futures Act 21 Jun 2011 Rockeby biomed Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	21 Jun 2011	Rockeby biomed Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to set aside arbitration award dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	CLAAS Medical Centre v Ng Boon Ching: Restraint of Trade, Third Party Rights 31 Jan 2010 CLAAS Medical Centre Pte Ltd (formerly known as Aesthetics Associates Pte Ltd) (Appellant)Won	31 Jan 2010	CLAAS Medical Centre Pte Ltd (formerly known as Aesthetics Associates Pte Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with costs. Judgment in favor of the Appellant in the sum of $763,500, being the difference between $1m and $236,500. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition Clause Dispute 31 May 2009 Deuter Sports GmbH (Respondent)Lost	31 May 2009	Deuter Sports GmbH (Respondent): Appeal DismissedDeuter Sports lost the appeal. The court found that Deuter Sports was not entitled to terminate its contract with Sports Connection. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Ng Boon Ching v Claas Medical Centre: Restraint of Trade & Third Party Rights 01 Mar 2009 Claas Medical Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Mar 2009	Claas Medical Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Tan Joy Hon v Sassoon Samuel: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Authority Dispute 05 Nov 2007 Tan Joy Hon (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Nov 2007	Tan Joy Hon (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' originating summons was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay indemnity costs to all nine defendants.
12	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Costs Thrown Away After Amendment of Pleadings 29 May 2007 Deuter Sports GmbH (Defendant, Respondent)Won	29 May 2007	Deuter Sports GmbH (Defendant, Respondent): Costs awardedCosts payable to Deuter Sports fixed at $34,500 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Burwill Trading Pte Ltd v Panwah Steel Pte Ltd: Dispute over Steel Bar Supply Contracts 26 Dec 2005 Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	26 Dec 2005	Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
14	Panwah Steel v Koh Brothers: Contract Interpretation & Damages for Failure to Deliver Steel Rebars 26 Dec 2005 Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Dec 2005	Panwah Steel Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPanwah's claim for $1,447,833.83 was dismissed.
15	Mohd Halmi v PP: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Dec 2005 Mohd Halmi bin Hamid (Appellant)Lost	08 Dec 2005	Mohd Halmi bin Hamid (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed as there were no submissions on behalf of the first appellant, and the court was satisfied from the record that there were no merits in the appeal.
16	Ong Thiam Huat v Chan Hock Seng: Liquidator Negligence & Debt Recovery 17 Oct 2004 Chan Hock Seng (Defendant)Won	17 Oct 2004	Chan Hock Seng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe claim against the defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Chuan & Company Pte Ltd v Ong Soon Huat: Limitation Act & Acknowledgment of Debt 04 Apr 2003 Chuan & Company Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Apr 2003	Chuan & Company Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant to pay the respondent's costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	KCC v Anti Corrosion: Defective Paint Claim & Damages Assessment 13 Jun 2001 KCC (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	13 Jun 2001	KCC (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $14,595.10 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Public Prosecutor v Chang Ying Leong: Rape Charges & Consent 23 May 2001 Chang Ying Leong (Defense)Lost	23 May 2001	Chang Ying Leong (Defense): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty on both charges and sentenced to imprisonment and caning.
20	Tang Dynasty City v Tan Seng Heng: Guarantee, Undertaking, and Theme Park Lease Dispute 07 Apr 2000 Tan Seng Heng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	07 Apr 2000	Tan Seng Heng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed regarding the sum of $3,250,000 claimed under the undertaking. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.