Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader

Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and bills of lading act. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 46% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated expertise across 108 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	22 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Floating Charges	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Priorities of Claims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Payment out of proceeds of sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntary conveyance to defraud creditors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conditional Stays	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unilateral Pricing Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reconciliation Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Misuse Counterclaim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Delivery of cargo against presentation of bills of lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debentures	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fixed Charges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negative Pledge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bona Fide Purchaser	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automatic Crystallisation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ordinary Course of Business	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Price Reduction Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Completion Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
SEAPA Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Monitoring Accountants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivers and Managers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undertaking as to Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-contract deposits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Choice of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liabilities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bill of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malicious Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Counter-restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearing Protocol	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 22 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	22 cases	92% of cases	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties(Jan 2024) DBL v DBM: Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice Dismissed(Sep 2023)
T S Oon & Bazul	1 cases	4% of cases	PT Soonlee v Synergy Shipping: Unseaworthy Barge & Liability for Lost Cargo(Jul 2007)
T S Oon and Bazul	1 cases	4% of cases	Uni-Fruitveg Suppliers v Hyundai Fortune: Stay of Action & Choice of Jurisdiction(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.1
Complex Cases: 11 (46%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	29.3 parties avg	9.3	8%
Lost	93.4 parties avg	3.4	38%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Partial	29.0 parties avg	9.0	8%
Won	116.6 parties avg	6.6	46%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2020	35.8 parties avg	5.8
2021	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	313.7 parties avg	13.7
2024	210.7 parties avg	10.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(8%)	8%
Lost	9(35%)	35%
Neutral	2(8%)	8%
Partial	2(8%)	8%
Won	11(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
GBP	30,000.00	30,000.001 cases	1
SGD	28,431,305.41	1,776,956.5916 cases	16
USD	8,200,780.70	2,733,593.573 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (50.0%)
2023	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Aug 2024	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Winson to pay costs to OCBC and SCB fixed at $200,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties 17 Jan 2024 Amit Shah (Defendant)Dismissed	17 Jan 2024	Amit Shah (Defendant): Counterclaims dismissedJG Jewelry Pte Ltd's counterclaims are dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	DBL v DBM: Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice Dismissed 21 Sep 2023 DBM (Defendant)Won	21 Sep 2023	DBM (Defendant): Award UpheldArbitration award in favor of DBM was upheld; DBL liable for US$4,683,418.97. Currency assumed to be USD as the underlying contract was in USD.
4	UCO Bank v Green Mint: Judgment on Merits Against Gupta Vaibhav for Personal Guarantee 27 Mar 2023 UCO Bank, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Won	27 Mar 2023	UCO Bank, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment on the merits for US$925,361.73 plus interest and costs (assumed USD, as the credit facility was in USD).
5	The "Ambassador": Prioritizing Claims Against Vessel Proceeds in Admiralty Dispute 04 Jan 2023 Drydocks World – Dubai LLC (Intervener, Applicant)Won	04 Jan 2023	Drydocks World – Dubai LLC (Intervener, Applicant): Claim to Balance Sale Proceeds had priorityDDW's claim to the Balance Sale Proceeds had priority over the other interveners and ordered the Balance Sale Proceeds to be paid out to DDW’s solicitors. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Standard Chartered Bank v Maersk Tankers: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Finance 26 Sep 2022 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener)Neutral	26 Sep 2022	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener): NeutralWinson Oil Trading Pte Ltd was the intervener in the proceedings.
7	PT Adidaya Energy Mandiri v MS First Capital Insurance: Marine Insurance Claim for Constructive Total Loss 30 Aug 2022 PT Adidaya Energy Mandiri (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Aug 2022	PT Adidaya Energy Mandiri (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for constructive total loss and sue and labor charges was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	OCBC v STI ORCHARD: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Financing 22 May 2022 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener)Neutral	22 May 2022	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Intervener): Unconditional leave to defend granted to DefendantThe court granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend.
9	Rothstar Group v Leow Quek Shiong: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue and Voluntary Conveyances 20 Mar 2022 Rothstar Group Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2022	Rothstar Group Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant): Appeal DismissedRothstar's appeals were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Batavia EXIMP v Owner of New Breeze: Stay of Proceedings & Time Bar Defence in Arbitration 26 Oct 2021 Batavia EXIMP & Contracting (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Oct 2021	Batavia EXIMP & Contracting (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of S$29,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest 19 Aug 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “LUNA” (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “LUNA” (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs order below is reversed in favor of the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Engineering Centre v EFE (SEA): Summary Judgment & Agent's Authority 10 Jan 2021 Engineering Centre of Industrial Constructions and Concrete (Plaintiff)Won	10 Jan 2021	Engineering Centre of Industrial Constructions and Concrete (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $2,592,000 (assumed USD, as the settlement agreement was denominated in USD).
13	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v J. G. Jewelry: Summary Judgment & Joint Venture Dispute 21 Jul 2020 Shree Ramkrishna Exports Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	21 Jul 2020	Shree Ramkrishna Exports Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Unconditional leave to defend granted to DefendantPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was denied; defendant was granted unconditional leave to defend. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	CEB v CEC: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract and Public Policy 03 May 2020 CEE (Defendant)Won	03 May 2020	CEE (Defendant): Claim WonDefendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's originating summons to set aside the arbitration award. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Malayan Banking v Bakri Navigation: Floating Charge Crystallization & Priority Dispute 28 Apr 2020 Red Sea Marine Services Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2020	Red Sea Marine Services Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Red Sea Marine Services Ltd prevailed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Cosco Nantong v Logitel: Pre-Action Discovery & Abuse of Process 28 Nov 2019 Logitel Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendants, Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2019	Logitel Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendants, Respondent): Application for leave to appeal dismissedDefendants' application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	OCBC v Owner of "Yue You 902": Bills of Lading, Delivery of Cargo, and Summary Judgment 23 Apr 2019 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “Yue You 902” (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	23 Apr 2019	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “Yue You 902” (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against summary judgment dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Malayan Banking v ASL Shipyard: Priority of Charges, Conspiracy, Malicious Prosecution 17 Mar 2019 Red Sea Marine Services Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Mar 2019	Red Sea Marine Services Ltd (Defendant): Claim AllowedThe court ruled in favor of Red Sea Marine Services Ltd.
19	Simpson Marine v Jiaravanon: Restitution for Failure of Consideration in Yacht Purchase Deposit 22 Jan 2019 Simpson Marine (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	22 Jan 2019	Simpson Marine (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant, fixed at $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Phillips 66 v Star Quest: Bills of Lading & Title in Bunker Supply Contracts after OW Bunker Insolvency 19 May 2016 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “LUNA” (Respondent)Won	19 May 2016	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “LUNA” (Respondent): Leave to Defend GrantedUnconditional leave to defend granted. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
21	Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holding Business Ltd: Coal Contract Dispute over Quality & Misrepresentation 27 Oct 2013 Vinay Parmanand Hariani (Defendant)Dismissed	27 Oct 2013	Vinay Parmanand Hariani (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff’s claims against the third defendant are dismissed.
22	S E Shipping Lines v Austral Asia Line: Winding-Up Application Dispute 29 Oct 2012 Austral Asia Line Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2012	Austral Asia Line Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	PT Soonlee v Synergy Shipping: Unseaworthy Barge & Liability for Lost Cargo 26 Jul 2007 Synergy Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	26 Jul 2007	Synergy Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liability limitedDefendant found liable but liability limited to £30,000.
24	Uni-Fruitveg Suppliers v Hyundai Fortune: Stay of Action & Choice of Jurisdiction 29 Feb 2004 EMF International SA (Defendant)Lost	29 Feb 2004	EMF International SA (Defendant): Stay Application DeniedStay application denied; appeal allowed against the stay of the action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).