Carrie Gill

Carrie Gill is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Carrie Gill has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Divorce	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial resources	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Earning capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial contribution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fire Insurance Policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Custody of Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indirect contributions ratio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carrie Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Carrie Gill has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	7 cases	64% of cases	UFU (M.W.) v UFV: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Child Maintenance(Sep 2017) TZG v TZH: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce - Dental Practice & Women's Charter(Mar 2017) ANJ v ANK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance After Divorce(Jul 2015)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	9% of cases	ANJ v ANK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings(Sep 2014)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	9% of cases	USB v USA: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Short Marriage with Long Cohabitation(Jun 2020)
Colin Ng and Partners	1 cases	9% of cases	Luzon Hydro v Transfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice(Sep 2004)
Azman Soh & Murugaiyan	1 cases	9% of cases	Lea Tool v CGU: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Fire Insurance Claim(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Carrie Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18%
Partial	72.0 parties avg	2.0	64%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Carrie Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(18%)	18%
Partial	7(64%)	64%
Won	2(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,907,233.70	990,723.3710 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	USB v USA: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Short Marriage with Long Cohabitation 11 Jun 2020 USA (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jun 2020	USA (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe Wife's appeal was dismissed in part, increasing her payment to the Husband by $22,665.44 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	UFU (M.W.) v UFV: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Child Maintenance 24 Sep 2017 UFU (M.W.) (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Sep 2017	UFU (M.W.) (Plaintiff): PartialThe Wife was awarded 37.5% of the matrimonial assets, amounting to $4,043,333 (Singapore Dollars).
3	TZG v TZH: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce - Dental Practice & Women's Charter 23 Mar 2017 TZG (Plaintiff)Partial	23 Mar 2017	TZG (Plaintiff): Division of matrimonial assets in her favorWife received 55.65% of the matrimonial assets (excluding the Dental Practice). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	ANJ v ANK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance After Divorce 06 Jul 2015 ANK (Respondent)Partial	06 Jul 2015	ANK (Respondent): Orders VariedThe ratio for the division of matrimonial assets was readjusted to 50:50.
5	ANJ v ANK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 29 Sep 2014 ANK (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	29 Sep 2014	ANK (Defendant, Respondent): PartialThe defendant/respondent was partially successful. The court made orders for the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance, but some aspects were appealed.
6	ACY v ACZ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Short, Childless Marriage 31 Mar 2014 ACZ (Defendant)Partial	31 Mar 2014	ACZ (Defendant): Partial LossOrdered to pay the Plaintiff 5% of the estimated value of the UK Property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	BJV v BJW: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute in Divorce 23 Jul 2013 BJW (Defendant)Partial	23 Jul 2013	BJW (Defendant): Orders made for joint custody with care and control to the defendant and reasonable access to the plaintiff. Deed of separation largely undisturbed with adjustments for lump sum maintenance.Defendant ordered to pay a lump sum maintenance of $380,000 to the plaintiff, calculated at $3,500 a month over nine years. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Chai Fei Choo v Leong Tak Wa: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 06 Sep 2012 Chai Fei Choo (Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2012	Chai Fei Choo (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original orders of the District Judge upheld. Costs of the appeal to be paid to the respondent and to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Chan Pui Yin v Lim Tiong Kei: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce 01 Sep 2011 Chan Pui Yin (Plaintiff)Partial	01 Sep 2011	Chan Pui Yin (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part, Plaintiff awarded $3,491,253.39 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Luzon Hydro v Transfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 12 Sep 2004 Luzon Hydro Corp (Applicant)Lost	12 Sep 2004	Luzon Hydro Corp (Applicant): Motion dismissed with costsMotion to set aside the Third Partial Award was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Lea Tool v CGU: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Fire Insurance Claim 19 Nov 2000 Lea Tool and Moulding Industries Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	19 Nov 2000	Lea Tool and Moulding Industries Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, default judgment set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).