Chin Yan Xun

Chin Yan Xun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and building and construction industry security of payment act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chin Yan Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chin Yan Xun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process(Jan 2022) Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages(Apr 2021) Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chin Yan Xun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chin Yan Xun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process 04 Jan 2022 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party, Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jan 2022	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party, Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication by Range Construction Pte Ltd for injunctions against Goldbell and Etiqa is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages 08 Apr 2021 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	08 Apr 2021	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
3	Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA 09 Sep 2020 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	09 Sep 2020	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedRange Construction's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.