Christopher Anand Daniel

Christopher Anand Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 55 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 9 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and costs. Their track record shows a 46.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 27 complex cases, representing 49% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 218 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	40 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 40 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	18 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	16 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	15 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	14 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	12 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	10 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	9 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Crisis	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mediation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consultancy Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Portfolio	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Application	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression Remedy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misfeasance in public office	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intimidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obligation to award academic degree	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guerrilla tactics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indian Contract Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disqualification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Effect of bankruptcy on directorship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Internal disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Party and party costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Investment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Debt Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholding Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-border disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder's Loans	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
E-discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Concession Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deed of Personal Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Spousal Consent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Association Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Apartment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pawnbrokers Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlawful Pawning	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bona Fide Purchasers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pawnshop's Right	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forex Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside of Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
ICC Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negotiation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigant-in-person	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disposal of Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Societies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investor-State Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonable costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christopher Anand Daniel has been affiliated with 9 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 39 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	39 cases	71% of cases	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Conspiracy, Misrepresentation in Ponzi Scheme(Apr 2023) WEW v WEX: Appeal over Mental Capacity Act & Lasting Power of Attorney Dispute(Dec 2022) Larpin v Nargolwala: Costs Determination in SICC Dispute over Property Transaction and Fraud Allegations(Aug 2022)
Allen and Gledhill	5 cases	9% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Chua Leong Chuan: Interlocutory Injunction for Breach of Employment Contract(Aug 2005) Teh Guek Ngor Engelin v Chia Ee Lin: Wrongful Termination of Consultancy Agreement Dispute(Apr 2005) Chia Ee Lin Evelyn v Teh Guek Ngor Engelin: Breach of Contract & Oral Agreements(Sep 2004)
Matthew Chiong Partnership	3 cases	5% of cases	Woo Kah Wai v Chew Ai Hua: Pre-Option Contract Breach & Option to Purchase Dispute(Jul 2014) Sandra Chew v Woo Kah Wai: Breach of Contract for Property Option(Jun 2013) Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute(Feb 2010)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	4% of cases	AAY v AAZ: Arbitration Confidentiality, Repudiation of Agreement, and Disclosure to Authorities(Jun 2009) Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG v Go Dante Yap: Civil Procedure & Admissibility of Documents(Sep 2007)
Helen Yeo & Partners	2 cases	4% of cases	Banque Nationale De Paris v Tan Nancy: Agency, Authority, and Costs in Share Transactions(Dec 2001) Banque Nationale v Tan Nancy: Unauthorized Trading & Authority in Forex Transactions(Nov 2001)
Nicholas & Co	1 cases	2% of cases	STX Corporation v Herry Beng Koestanto: Mareva Injunction & Forum Non Conveniens Dispute(Sep 2008)
Clifford Law LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Validity of Receiver Appointment & Mortgage Enforcement(Aug 2009)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	2% of cases	John Holland v Toyo Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award under International Arbitration Act(Mar 2001)
The Law Society of Singapore	1 cases	2% of cases	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christopher Anand Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 27 (49%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	2%
Lost	205.7 parties avg	5.7	36%
Neutral	64.3 parties avg	4.3	11%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Unknown	26.0 parties avg	6.0	4%
Won	264.1 parties avg	4.1	47%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2003	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2004	212.5 parties avg	12.5
2005	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2012	25.2 parties avg	5.2
2013	64.1 parties avg	4.1
2014	54.8 parties avg	4.8
2015	43.4 parties avg	3.4
2016	29.5 parties avg	9.5
2017	44.6 parties avg	4.6
2018	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	43.9 parties avg	3.9
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christopher Anand Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	20(36%)	36%
Neutral	6(11%)	11%
Partial	1(2%)	2%
Unknown	2(4%)	4%
Won	26(46%)	46%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	135,498,606.56	4,234,331.4632 cases	32
USD	1,200,000.00	1,200,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2011	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	6 213	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Unknown: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2014	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2015	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2018	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2019	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 55 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Conspiracy, Misrepresentation in Ponzi Scheme 13 Apr 2023 Strategic Wealth Consultancy Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	13 Apr 2023	Strategic Wealth Consultancy Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; all claims against them were dismissed.
2	WEW v WEX: Appeal over Mental Capacity Act & Lasting Power of Attorney Dispute 29 Dec 2022 K (Other)Won	29 Dec 2022	K (Other): Costs AwardedCosts of $20,000 awarded to K at first instance, and $5,000 for the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Larpin v Nargolwala: Costs Determination in SICC Dispute over Property Transaction and Fraud Allegations 25 Aug 2022 Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Aug 2022	Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to defendantsPlaintiffs to pay the defendants S$392,340.78 inclusive of GST and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Larpin v Nargolwala: Application for Indemnity Costs in SICC Dispute 24 Apr 2022 Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Apr 2022	Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Application for indemnity costs refusedThe defendants' application for indemnity costs was refused, and the defendants must pay the plaintiffs’ costs which may be set off against the costs payable by the plaintiffs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Larpin v Nargolwala: Rescission Claim for Villa Purchase Based on Misrepresentation 20 Feb 2022 Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Feb 2022	Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for rescission of agreements, return of purchase price, and damages was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Public Prosecutor v Steven John: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 06 May 2021 Steven John a/l Gobalkrishnan (Defendant)Lost	06 May 2021	Steven John a/l Gobalkrishnan (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedAccused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 27 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
7	Larpin v Nargolwala: Security for Costs Application in Villa Sale Dispute 23 Nov 2020 Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Won	23 Nov 2020	Quo Vadis Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for security of costs was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the jurisdiction's primary currency (SGD) is assumed.
8	JWR Pte Ltd v Edmond Pereira Law Corp: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Contract Breach 11 Nov 2019 Edmond Avethas Pereira (Defendant)Won	11 Nov 2019	Edmond Avethas Pereira (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Re Gearing: Ad Hoc Admission for Investor-State Arbitration - Legal Profession Act 17 Oct 2019 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Neutral	17 Oct 2019	Law Society of Singapore (Other): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore was involved in the proceedings, but no specific outcome was assigned to them.
10	Law Society of Singapore v G B Vasudeven: Disciplinary Proceedings for Grossly Improper Conduct and Forgery 13 Aug 2019 G B Vasudeven (Respondent)Lost	13 Aug 2019	G B Vasudeven (Respondent): Struck off the roll of advocates and solicitorsThe court ordered that the respondent be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors and awarded costs of the proceedings to the Law Society. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Chan Gek Yong v Violet Netto: Striking Out Claim for Professional Negligence and Breach of Trust After Settlement Agreement 19 Sep 2018 Violet Netto (Defendant, Respondent)Won	19 Sep 2018	Violet Netto (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore: Negligence, Breach of Duty, Intimidation, Misfeasance in Public Office, Breach of Contract 08 Jul 2018 Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Jul 2018	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract, negligence, intimidation, and misfeasance in public office was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Sunrise Industries v PT OKI Pulp: Performance Bond Dispute & Fraud Exception 20 Jun 2018 Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jun 2018	Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for fresh injunctions dismissedSunrise's application for fresh injunctions on the same terms was dismissed.
14	Harish Salve v BPW: Ad Hoc Admission for Foreign Counsel in ICC Arbitration Dispute 24 Jan 2018 Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Neutral	24 Jan 2018	Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore was a non-party providing submissions to the court.
15	Deepak Sharma v Law Society: Costs in Private Judicial Review 12 Jul 2017 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	12 Jul 2017	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Appellant to pay costs to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Devagi v Tommy Wong: Misuse of Funds in Neptune Court Owners’ Association Defamation Proceedings 28 Jun 2017 LEE KIM WOON MICHAEL (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2017	LEE KIM WOON MICHAEL (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendants' defense dismissed; the court ordered a refund of the misspent monies. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Deepak Sharma v Law Society: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Proceedings for Excessive Party and Party Costs 15 Mar 2017 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	15 Mar 2017	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the Law Society of Singapore.
18	Re Harish Salve: Ad Hoc Admission for Indian Law Expertise in Arbitration Award Challenge 16 Feb 2017 Law Society (Other)Neutral	16 Feb 2017	Law Society (Other): Application OpposedThe Law Society opposed the applications.
19	Re Landau: Ad Hoc Admission for CMNC's Arbitration Award Challenge 27 Nov 2016 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Won	27 Nov 2016	Law Society of Singapore (Other): Opposition UpheldThe Law Society of Singapore opposed the application for ad hoc admission, and the application was dismissed.
20	Re Wordsworth: Ad Hoc Admission for Lesotho's Investor-State Arbitration Challenge 28 Aug 2016 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Lost	28 Aug 2016	Law Society of Singapore (Other): Application OpposedOpposed the application for ad hoc admission.
21	Haneda Construction v Huttons Asia: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Property Sale 11 Nov 2015 Haneda Construction & Machinery Pte Ltd, formerly known as Royal Star Logistics & Transportation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Nov 2015	Haneda Construction & Machinery Pte Ltd, formerly known as Royal Star Logistics & Transportation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs fixed at $120,000, plus disbursements fixed at $13,100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Jayanti Nadarajoo v Bronwyn Matthews: Share Valuation Dispute under Companies Act 26 Aug 2015 BRONWYN HELEN MATTHEWS (Defendant)Won	26 Aug 2015	BRONWYN HELEN MATTHEWS (Defendant): Application grantedApplication to reduce share capital granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Sports Connection v Asia Law Corp: Professional Negligence, Trademark, Damages Assessment 13 Aug 2015 Samuel Seow Law Corporation (Defendant)Won	13 Aug 2015	Samuel Seow Law Corporation (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Rogers v. Ngerng: Ad Hoc Admission for Defamation Case Assessment of Damages 07 Jul 2015 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	07 Jul 2015	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore opposed the application.
25	Re Michael Fordham QC: Ad Hoc Admission & Judicial Review of Law Society Decision 04 Nov 2014 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	04 Nov 2014	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Successful Resistance of ApplicationSuccessfully resisted the application for ad hoc admission.
26	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore: Wrongful Termination of Candidature & Without Prejudice Privilege 28 Oct 2014 Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Oct 2014	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal to include disputed sub-paragraphs in her amended statement of claim was dismissed.
27	Su Ah Tee v Allister Lim: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Property Purchase 10 Aug 2014 M/S ALLISTER LIM AND THRUMURGAN (Defendant)Lost	10 Aug 2014	M/S ALLISTER LIM AND THRUMURGAN (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $317,688 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Woo Kah Wai v Chew Ai Hua: Pre-Option Contract Breach & Option to Purchase Dispute 31 Jul 2014 Chew Ai Hua Sandra (Respondent, Appellant)Neutral	31 Jul 2014	Chew Ai Hua Sandra (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Vendors to bear 50% of the Purchaser’s costs in relation to Civil Appeal No 83 of 2013. No costs order in relation to Civil Appeal No 84 of 2013. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of Arrangement 15 May 2014 Law Society of Singapore (Appellant)Won	15 May 2014	Law Society of Singapore (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	18 Sep 2013	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Opposition UpheldThe Law Society of Singapore's opposition to the application was upheld.
31	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice 16 Sep 2013 Law Society (Respondent)Lost	16 Sep 2013	Law Society (Respondent): Application AllowedThe Law Society opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.
32	Chiang Sing Jeong v Treasure Resort: Shareholding Dispute & Express Trust Claim 04 Jul 2013 Treasure Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	04 Jul 2013	Treasure Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant): Shares to be transferredOrdered to register Lim as a member on TR’s register of members as soon as MDG has transferred the TR shares in question to Lim and to file all the requisite documents with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority in relation to the transfer of TR shares to Lim.
33	Sandra Chew v Woo Kah Wai: Breach of Contract for Property Option 27 Jun 2013 Chew Ai Hua Sandra (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jun 2013	Chew Ai Hua Sandra (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed. The option money of $9,200 is to be repaid by the Defendants to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Re Caplan: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel Denied in City Harvest Church Criminal Breach of Trust Case 07 Apr 2013 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)	07 Apr 2013	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): -
35	Maldives Airports v GMR Malé: Interim Injunction & Concession Agreement Dispute 12 Feb 2013 Republic of the Maldives (Appellant)Won	12 Feb 2013	Republic of the Maldives (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the injunction was set aside.
36	Pilkadaris v Asian Tour: Restraint of Trade in Professional Golf 26 Nov 2012 Anis Helmi Hassan (Plaintiff)Won	26 Nov 2012	Anis Helmi Hassan (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; fines to be repaid and injunction granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	Tan & Au LLP v Goh Teh Lee: Professional Negligence & Solicitor's Fees Dispute 24 Jun 2012 Tan & Au LLP (Plaintiff)Won	24 Jun 2012	Tan & Au LLP (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $23,703.66 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
38	Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria: Investment Losses & Advisory Duty Dispute 07 Aug 2011 Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Respondent)Won	07 Aug 2011	Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Respondent awarded 90% of the costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 10 Apr 2011 Linda Kao Chai-Chau (Defendant)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Linda Kao Chai-Chau (Defendant): Leave to commence derivative proceedings granted in partLeave granted to commence derivative proceedings on claims related to KSCCI, Ribands, and Mega-Bond.
40	PMA Credit Opportunities Fund v Tantono Tiny: Summary Judgment & Guarantee Enforcement 10 Apr 2011 Tantono Tiny (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Tantono Tiny (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against summary judgment dismissed; original judgment for S$133,478,558.52 stands (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
41	Pilkadaris Terry v Asian Tour: Interim Injunction for Restraint of Trade 05 Oct 2010 Pilkadaris Terry (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Oct 2010	Pilkadaris Terry (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedApplications for interim injunction dismissed, with costs in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
42	Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria: Investment Losses & Bank's Duty of Care 04 Aug 2010 Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Defendant)Won	04 Aug 2010	Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's action dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute 28 Feb 2010 Cheong Lay Yong (Plaintiff)Won	28 Feb 2010	Cheong Lay Yong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff, with an order for specific performance of the contract for the sale of the Apartment, interest under Condition 8.2 of the Law Society Conditions of Sale, and an account for the net rent, if any. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Validity of Receiver Appointment & Mortgage Enforcement 05 Aug 2009 Consult Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	05 Aug 2009	Consult Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal in Civil Appeal No 90 of 2009 by Consult Asia is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	AAY v AAZ: Arbitration Confidentiality, Repudiation of Agreement, and Disclosure to Authorities 14 Jun 2009 AAZ (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2009	AAZ (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant, AAZ, as the court found no repudiation of the arbitration agreement. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
46	STX Corporation v Herry Beng Koestanto: Mareva Injunction & Forum Non Conveniens Dispute 09 Sep 2008 STX Energy Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Sep 2008	STX Energy Co Ltd (Plaintiff): NeutralThe outcome for STX Energy Co Ltd is neutral as the judgment primarily focuses on the Mareva injunction application and stay of proceedings.
47	Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG v Go Dante Yap: Civil Procedure & Admissibility of Documents 11 Sep 2007 Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Appellant)Dismissed	11 Sep 2007	Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Appellant): Appeal Struck OutAppeal struck out and issue remitted to the trial judge for further consideration. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
48	Tullett Prebon v Chua Leong Chuan: Interlocutory Injunction for Breach of Employment Contract 18 Aug 2005 BGC International (S) Branch (Other)	18 Aug 2005	BGC International (S) Branch (Other): -
49	Teh Guek Ngor Engelin v Chia Ee Lin: Wrongful Termination of Consultancy Agreement Dispute 05 Apr 2005 Chia Ee Lin Evelyn (Respondent)Won	05 Apr 2005	Chia Ee Lin Evelyn (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
50	Chia Ee Lin Evelyn v Teh Guek Ngor Engelin: Breach of Contract & Oral Agreements 01 Sep 2004 Chia Ee Lin Evelyn (Plaintiff)Won	01 Sep 2004	Chia Ee Lin Evelyn (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff on her claims, as verified later. The amount owing to the plaintiff is $408,986.82. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
51	Wang Wang Pawnshop v K J Tiffany: Criminal Breach of Trust & Disposal of Unlawfully Pawned Jewellery 03 Mar 2004 Thai Hong Pawnshop Pte Ltd (Petitioner)Lost	03 Mar 2004	Thai Hong Pawnshop Pte Ltd (Petitioner): Petition dismissedThe petition for revision of the disposal order was dismissed.
52	Mak Chik Lun v Loh Kim Her: Enforceability of Deed of Settlement under Moneylenders Act 24 Sep 2003 Katell Investment Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 Sep 2003	Katell Investment Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiffs’ application to exclude certain affidavits of evidence-in-chief allowed.
53	Banque Nationale De Paris v Tan Nancy: Agency, Authority, and Costs in Share Transactions 04 Dec 2001 Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant)Partial	04 Dec 2001	Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; BNP awarded 25% of costs below and 40% of costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
54	Banque Nationale v Tan Nancy: Unauthorized Trading & Authority in Forex Transactions 20 Nov 2001 Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant)Won	20 Nov 2001	Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant): Claims AllowedThe claims of Banque Nationale De Paris against Tan Shee Chin and Nancy Tan were allowed with interest at 6% from the date of the writ.
55	John Holland v Toyo Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award under International Arbitration Act 13 Mar 2001 John Holland Pty Ltd (fka John Holland Construction & Engineering Pty Ltd) (Applicant)Lost	13 Mar 2001	John Holland Pty Ltd (fka John Holland Construction & Engineering Pty Ltd) (Applicant): Motion DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.