Eu Hai Meng

Eu Hai Meng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and work injury compensation. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duties and liabilities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rule in Rylands v Fletcher	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Industrial Accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ All Risk Policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eu Hai Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eu Hai Meng has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
United Legal Alliance LLC	5 cases	63% of cases	Lee Swee Chon v Kiat Seng Metals: Workplace Negligence & Contributory Negligence(Jan 2018) Md Shohel v Chen Yongbiao: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Illegality in Workplace Injury Claim(May 2017) Poh Huat Heng v Hafizul Islam: Industrial Accident, Paraplegia, Damages Assessment(Jun 2012)
Civic Legal LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	SYT Consultants v QBE Insurance: Professional Indemnity & Breach of Duty Claims(Oct 2022)
United Legal Alliance	1 cases	13% of cases	Pang Chew Kim v Wartsila: Work Injury Compensation for Overseas Death & 'Course of Employment' Legal Issue(Aug 2011)
Cooma Lau & Loh	1 cases	13% of cases	Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints: Wrongful Dismissal Claim(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eu Hai Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Lost	83.2 parties avg	3.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eu Hai Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	8(89%)	89%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100.00	16.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SYT Consultants v QBE Insurance: Professional Indemnity & Breach of Duty Claims 06 Oct 2022 SYT Consultants Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Oct 2022	SYT Consultants Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
2	Lee Swee Chon v Kiat Seng Metals: Workplace Negligence & Contributory Negligence 30 Jan 2018 Kiat Seng Metals Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Jan 2018	Kiat Seng Metals Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liability for NegligenceFound 65% liable for the plaintiff's damages due to negligence. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Md Shohel v Chen Yongbiao: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Illegality in Workplace Injury Claim 11 May 2017 Dongwu Steel Industry Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 May 2017	Dongwu Steel Industry Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liability for 80% of damagesFound liable for 80% of the damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Poh Huat Heng v Hafizul Islam: Industrial Accident, Paraplegia, Damages Assessment 24 Jun 2012 Viscas Engineering Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 Jun 2012	Viscas Engineering Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
5	Pang Chew Kim v Wartsila: Work Injury Compensation for Overseas Death & 'Course of Employment' Legal Issue 22 Aug 2011 India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	22 Aug 2011	India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedApplication for the Commissioner’s decision to be reversed is granted. Costs are awarded to the Applicant to be taxed or agreed between the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	PC Connect v HSBC: Negligence & Nuisance Claims for Water Leakage in Commercial Lease Dispute 19 May 2010 Bachmann Japanese Restaurant Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 May 2010	Bachmann Japanese Restaurant Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe plaintiff is to have judgment against the second defendant for the second incident with nominal damages of $100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	B-Gold Interior Design v Zurich Insurance: Contractors' All-Risks Policy & Exclusion Clauses 02 Aug 2007 Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	02 Aug 2007	Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Zurich Insurance liable to indemnify B-Gold against all sums for which B-Gold was liable to MediaCorp, less the excess of $3,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints: Wrongful Dismissal Claim 15 Nov 2000 Keimfarben Gmbh Co Kg (Defendant)Dismissed	15 Nov 2000	Keimfarben Gmbh Co Kg (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the 4th defendants is dismissed with costs. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.