George Tan

George Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

George Tan has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Architectural Engineering	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Quantity Surveying	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	George Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

George Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ChanTan LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Permasteelisa v Hyundai: Arbitration Award Recourse & Misconduct Claim(Feb 2005) Liew Ter Kwang v Hurry General Contractor: Appeal on Arbitration Award Regarding Extension of Time in Construction Contract(May 2004)
Chan Tan & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Shia Kian Eng v Nakano Singapore: Construction Dispute over Plastering Works and Wrongful Termination(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of George Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of George Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	942,992.20	942,992.201 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Permasteelisa v Hyundai: Arbitration Award Recourse & Misconduct Claim 14 Feb 2005 Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd (Applicant)Partial	14 Feb 2005	Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd (Applicant): Application allowed in partCertain matters remitted to the arbitrator for reconsideration.
2	Liew Ter Kwang v Hurry General Contractor: Appeal on Arbitration Award Regarding Extension of Time in Construction Contract 10 May 2004 Liew Ter Kwang (Applicant)Won	10 May 2004	Liew Ter Kwang (Applicant): Leave to appeal grantedThe applicant was granted leave to appeal the arbitration award.
3	Shia Kian Eng v Nakano Singapore: Construction Dispute over Plastering Works and Wrongful Termination 02 Apr 2001 Shia Kian Eng (trading as Forest Contractors) (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Apr 2001	Shia Kian Eng (trading as Forest Contractors) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favor of Shia Kian Eng for $942,992.20 after set-off of counterclaim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).