Gill Dedar Singh

Gill Dedar Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and trademark infringement. Their track record shows a 86.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and trademark infringement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice9% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Well Known Trade Marks	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trade names	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Groundless threats of infringement proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service mark	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gill Dedar Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gill Dedar Singh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Nestlé v Petra Foods: Shape Mark Distinctiveness & Technical Functionality in Trade Mark Law(Nov 2016) Hai Tong Co v Ventree Singapore: Trade Mark Infringement of 'Lady Rose' Mark(May 2012) RecordTV v MediaCorp: Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats, and Time-Shifting(Dec 2009)
One Legal LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Mainfreight (S) Pte Ltd v Mainfreight International Logistics Pte Ltd: Passing Off of Trade Name and Service Mark(Aug 2012)
Drew & Napier LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Ozone Community Corp v Advance Magazine Publishers: Trade Mark Dispute over 'HYSTERIC GLAMOUR' and 'GLAMOUR'(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gill Dedar Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	63.7 parties avg	3.7	86%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	24.4 parties avg	4.4
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gill Dedar Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Won	6(86%)	86%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nestlé v Petra Foods: Shape Mark Distinctiveness & Technical Functionality in Trade Mark Law 23 Nov 2016 Delfi Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	23 Nov 2016	Delfi Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for invalidation of trade mark registration and groundless threats of trade mark infringement allowed.
2	Mainfreight (S) Pte Ltd v Mainfreight International Logistics Pte Ltd: Passing Off of Trade Name and Service Mark 14 Aug 2012 Mainfreight International Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Aug 2012	Mainfreight International Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted restraining the defendant from passing off by using the trade name MAINFREIGHT (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hai Tong Co v Ventree Singapore: Trade Mark Infringement of 'Lady Rose' Mark 10 May 2012 Hai Tong Co. (Pte) Ltd. (Plaintiff)Won	10 May 2012	Hai Tong Co. (Pte) Ltd. (Plaintiff): Injunction granted to restrain trade mark infringementInjunctions granted to restrain the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiff’s “Lady Rose” mark. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ozone Community Corp v Advance Magazine Publishers: Trade Mark Dispute over 'HYSTERIC GLAMOUR' and 'GLAMOUR' 14 Jan 2010 Ozone Community Corp (Appellant)Won	14 Jan 2010	Ozone Community Corp (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the decision of the PAR was reversed.
5	RecordTV v MediaCorp: Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats, and Time-Shifting 20 Dec 2009 MediaCorp Studios Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Dec 2009	MediaCorp Studios Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedInterlocutory judgment granted to the defendants with damages to be assessed by the registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mitac v SingTel: Trade Mark Infringement Dispute over 'Mio' Marks 04 Jun 2009 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	04 Jun 2009	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Claims dismissedPlaintiff's claims for trade mark infringement and invalidation of defendant's trade marks were dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Love & Co v The Carat Club: Trade Mark Invalidity & Revocation for 'LOVE' 21 Sep 2008 Love & Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Sep 2008	Love & Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedPlaintiff's application granted; registration of the defendant's simple “LOVE” mark declared invalid and revoked (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).