Hazel Tang

Hazel Tang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in collective sales and construction law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hazel Tang has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hazel Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hazel Tang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	YTL Construction v Balanced Engineering: SOP Act Adjudication Determination Dispute(Jul 2014) York International v Voltas: Injunction against Performance Bond Call in Arbitration(Jun 2013) Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth v Goh Kok Hwa Richard: Collective Sale Approval Appeal(May 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hazel Tang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	25.8 parties avg	5.8	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hazel Tang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	754,111.22	251,370.413 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	YTL Construction v Balanced Engineering: SOP Act Adjudication Determination Dispute 14 Jul 2014 Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Jul 2014	Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Adjudication Determination Set AsideThe adjudication determination in favor of the Defendant for $754,111.22 was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	York International v Voltas: Injunction against Performance Bond Call in Arbitration 30 Jun 2013 York International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jun 2013	York International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication for injunction granted. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth v Goh Kok Hwa Richard: Collective Sale Approval Appeal 11 May 2009 Lee Choon Kum Beatrice (Respondent)Won	11 May 2009	Lee Choon Kum Beatrice (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Strata Titles Board approving the collective sale of the development was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).