Imran Hamid

Imran Hamid is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 82.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 18% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Imran Hamid has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Sexual Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carnal Intercourse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Familial Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unnatural Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gross Indecency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Paedophilia	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing the Course of Justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Custody of Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Imran Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Imran Hamid has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	27% of cases	PP v Norhisham Bin Mohamad Dahlan: Culpable Homicide & Secret Society Violence(Jul 2003) PP v Muhamad Hasik: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly & Secret Societies(May 2002) Public Prosecutor v Steven Ang: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2002)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	27% of cases	Chan Pui Yin v Lim Tiong Kei: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce(Sep 2011) AQB v AQC: Appeal on Conditions for Final Divorce Judgment under Women's Charter(Apr 2011) Arul Chandran v Chew Chin Aik Victor JP: Defamation, Damages, Justification & Qualified Privilege(Jan 2001)
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	18% of cases	PP v Lim Beng Cheok: Sentencing for Carnal Intercourse and Gross Indecency with Male Students(Mar 2003) PP v Teng Boon Leng: Abduction and Attempted Rape at Bugis Junction(Feb 2003)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	18% of cases	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation(Jun 2007) PP v NF: Sentencing for Father's Rape of Daughter - Deterrence & Mitigation(Sep 2006)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	9% of cases	Public Prosecutor v C: Sentencing for Outrage of Modesty and Unnatural Offences(Apr 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Imran Hamid's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 2 (18%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18%
Won	92.4 parties avg	2.4	82%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Imran Hamid's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(18%)	18%
Won	9(82%)	82%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,491,253.39	1,163,751.133 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Pui Yin v Lim Tiong Kei: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce 01 Sep 2011 Lim Tiong Kei (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	01 Sep 2011	Lim Tiong Kei (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part, Defendant ordered to pay $3,491,253.39 to the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	AQB v AQC: Appeal on Conditions for Final Divorce Judgment under Women's Charter 26 Apr 2011 AQC (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Apr 2011	AQC (Respondent, Defendant): Leave to make interim judgment final upheldThe husband's application for leave to make the interim judgment final was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation 26 Jun 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Jun 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were found guilty on the charge they faced, convicted them, and imposed the mandatory death sentence on them.
4	PP v NF: Sentencing for Father's Rape of Daughter - Deterrence & Mitigation 20 Sep 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Sep 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
5	PP v Norhisham Bin Mohamad Dahlan: Culpable Homicide & Secret Society Violence 24 Jul 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jul 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused convicted.The accused was convicted of culpable homicide.
6	Public Prosecutor v C: Sentencing for Outrage of Modesty and Unnatural Offences 01 Apr 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Apr 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused convictedThe Public Prosecutor won the case as the accused was convicted.
7	PP v Lim Beng Cheok: Sentencing for Carnal Intercourse and Gross Indecency with Male Students 12 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 18 years imprisonment.
8	PP v Teng Boon Leng: Abduction and Attempted Rape at Bugis Junction 13 Feb 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Feb 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for Prosecution
9	PP v Muhamad Hasik: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly & Secret Societies 12 May 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 May 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
10	Public Prosecutor v Steven Ang: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Mar 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Mar 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were convicted on the charges.
11	Arul Chandran v Chew Chin Aik Victor JP: Defamation, Damages, Justification & Qualified Privilege 15 Jan 2001 Chew Chin Aik Victor JP (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	15 Jan 2001	Chew Chin Aik Victor JP (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedMr. Chew's appeal against the finding of defamation and the quantum of damages was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.