Public Prosecutor v Steven Ang: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act
In Public Prosecutor v Steven Ang Keng Leong, Bala Murugan A/L Krishnan, and Lim Boon Kiat, the High Court of Singapore convicted all three defendants on charges related to drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Steven Ang was found guilty of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. Bala Murugan was convicted of abetting the commission of the offence of trafficking in the said drugs. Lim Boon Kiat was found guilty of abetting Steven Ang to traffic in diamorphine. The court sentenced all three accused persons to the mandatory death sentence.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Guilty as charged
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Steven Ang, Bala Murugan, and Lim Boon Kiat were convicted of drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Ang possessed diamorphine, Murugan abetted the trafficking, and Kiat aided Ang.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Prosecution | Government Agency | Judgment for Prosecution | Won | Amarjit Singh of Attorney-General’s Chambers Imran Hamid of Attorney-General’s Chambers Lee Jwee Nguan of Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Bala Murugan a/l Krishnan | Defendant | Individual | Guilty as charged | Lost | |
Lim Boon Kiat | Defendant | Individual | Guilty as charged | Lost | |
Steven Ang Keng Leong | Defendant | Individual | Guilty as charged | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tay Yong Kwang | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Amarjit Singh | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Imran Hamid | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Lee Jwee Nguan | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Billy Low | Billy & Alsree |
Allagarasamy P | Pereria & Tan |
Lawrence Wong | Lawrence Wong & Co |
Patrick Chow | Patrick Chow & Associates |
4. Facts
- Steven Ang possessed 37.08 grams of diamorphine.
- Bala Murugan provided 37.08 grams of diamorphine to Steven Ang.
- Lim Boon Kiat drove Steven Ang to Yishun.
- Steven Ang admitted the drugs found in his flat belonged to him.
- Lim Boon Kiat admitted to being a drug addict.
- Bala Murugan claimed he was asked by a friend to deliver the haversack.
5. Formal Citations
- Public Prosecutor v Steven Ang Keng Leong and Others, CC 6/2002, [2002] SGHC 57
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Steven Ang Keng Leong possessed 37.08 grams of diamorphine. | |
Bala Murugan A/L Krishnan provided 37.08 grams of diamorphine to Steven Ang Keng Leong. | |
Lim Boon Kiat aided Steven Ang Keng Leong in conveying him to Yishun. | |
CNB officers conducted surveillance on Steven Ang Keng Leong. | |
Bala Murugan A/L Krishnan was arrested by CNB officers. | |
Steven Ang Keng Leong and Lim Boon Kiat were arrested by CNB officers. | |
ASP Toh Soon Teck recorded a statement from Steven Ang Keng Leong. | |
Steven Ang Keng Leong gave a long statement. | |
Lim Boon Kiat gave a long statement. | |
Steven Ang Keng Leong continued with his statement. | |
Bala Murugan A/L Krishnan made a further statement. | |
Bala Murugan A/L Krishnan made yet another statement. | |
Steven Ang Keng Leong gave a further statement. | |
Lim Boon Kiat gave a further statement. | |
Preliminary inquiry held. | |
Decision Date. |
7. Legal Issues
- Drug Trafficking
- Outcome: The court found all three defendants guilty of drug trafficking offenses.
- Category: Substantive
- Abetment
- Outcome: The court found Bala Murugan and Lim Boon Kiat guilty of abetting the drug trafficking offense.
- Category: Substantive
- Conspiracy
- Outcome: The court found Bala Murugan guilty of conspiracy to traffic drugs.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Conviction
- Mandatory Death Sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Drug Trafficking
- Abetment
- Conspiracy
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tan Siew Chay & Ors v PP | Court of Criminal Appeal | Yes | [1993] 2 SLR 14 | Singapore | Cited for the explanation of active complicity. |
Lai Kam Loy & Ors v PP | N/A | Yes | [1994] 1 SLR 787 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that direct evidence of a conspiracy would rarely be available. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185, section 5(1)(a) | Singapore |
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185, section 5(2) | Singapore |
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185, section 12 | Singapore |
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 185, section 33 | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code section 122 (6) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Diamorphine
- Drug Trafficking
- Abetment
- Conspiracy
- CNB
- Haversack
- Sachets
- Liap
15.2 Keywords
- Drug Trafficking
- Diamorphine
- Singapore
- Misuse of Drugs Act
- Criminal Law
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act | 95 |
Criminal Law | 60 |
Criminal Procedure | 50 |
Offences | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Drug Offences