Janus Low

Janus Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Janus Low has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Janus Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Janus Low has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
August Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Tang Ling Lee v Public Prosecutor: Negligence Causing Grievous Hurt & Sentencing(Jan 2018) Thu Aung Zaw v Ku Swee Boon: Amendment of Summary Judgment & Legal Capacity of Sole Proprietorship(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Janus Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Janus Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tang Ling Lee v Public Prosecutor: Negligence Causing Grievous Hurt & Sentencing 24 Jan 2018 Tang Ling Lee (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2018	Tang Ling Lee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the one-week imprisonment sentence was dismissed.
2	Thu Aung Zaw v Ku Swee Boon: Amendment of Summary Judgment & Legal Capacity of Sole Proprietorship 26 Oct 2017 Ku Swee Boon (trading as Norb Creative Studio) (Respondent)Won	26 Oct 2017	Ku Swee Boon (trading as Norb Creative Studio) (Respondent): Amendment Application AllowedAmendment Application allowed.