Jason Lim Chen Thor

Jason Lim Chen Thor is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in collective sales and strata title law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in collective sales and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Collective Sales	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domicile	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private Sector Corruption	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Lim Chen Thor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason Lim Chen Thor has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
De Souza Lim & Goh LLP	6 cases	75% of cases	Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling: Strata Titles, Collective Sales Dispute(Nov 2018) Teo Mei Ling Karen v Low Kwang Tong: Collective Sale Order Dispute(Aug 2018) Deorukhkar Sameer Vinay v Quek Chin Kheam: Collective Sale Dispute under Land Titles (Strata) Act(Jul 2018)
De Souza Lim & Goh	2 cases	25% of cases	Premium Automobiles v Song Gin Puay Ronnie: Employee's Entitlement to Performance Bonus Dispute(Nov 2009) Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Domicile Dispute & Estate Duty(Apr 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason Lim Chen Thor's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	63.8 parties avg	3.8	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	34.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason Lim Chen Thor's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,105,000.00	368,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling: Strata Titles, Collective Sales Dispute 28 Nov 2018 Lim Siew Ming (Respondent)Won	28 Nov 2018	Lim Siew Ming (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellant is ordered to pay the respondents costs of $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Teo Mei Ling Karen v Low Kwang Tong: Collective Sale Order Dispute 22 Aug 2018 Lim Siew Ming (Plaintiff)Won	22 Aug 2018	Lim Siew Ming (Plaintiff): Collective sale order grantedCollective sale order granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Deorukhkar Sameer Vinay v Quek Chin Kheam: Collective Sale Dispute under Land Titles (Strata) Act 26 Jul 2018 Lee Teck Har (Plaintiff)Won	26 Jul 2018	Lee Teck Har (Plaintiff): Application GrantedThe court quashed the Stop Order imposed by STB and allowed the collective sale to proceed.
4	Li Suk Fong Susana v Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee: Trust Administration & Trustee's Costs 09 Jun 2015 Li Suk Fong Susana (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Jun 2015	Li Suk Fong Susana (Plaintiff): Costs to be determinedThe quantum of costs is to be determined at a later date, if parties are unable to agree.
5	Public Prosecutor v Tee Fook Boon Andrew: Private Sector Corruption & Bribery in Food Supply Contracts 21 Aug 2011 Tee Fook Boon Andrew (Respondent)Lost	21 Aug 2011	Tee Fook Boon Andrew (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced from four months' imprisonment to 40 weeks' imprisonment.
6	Pun Serge v Joy Head Investments: Performance Bond & Breach of Contract 28 Jun 2010 Pun Serge (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2010	Pun Serge (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; claim of S$1m allowed together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from 26 February 2009 to the date of this judgment, and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Premium Automobiles v Song Gin Puay Ronnie: Employee's Entitlement to Performance Bonus Dispute 10 Nov 2009 Song Gin Puay Ronnie (Respondent, Defendant)Won	10 Nov 2009	Song Gin Puay Ronnie (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found the defendant entitled to pro-rated bonus for the period from September to November 2006.
8	Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Domicile Dispute & Estate Duty 16 Apr 2009 Peters Roger May (Applicant, Executor)Won	16 Apr 2009	Peters Roger May (Applicant, Executor): Application GrantedThe executor's application for a notation to be endorsed on the grant of probate for the deceased, Mr Dennis William Pinder, that he died domiciled in Singapore was granted.