Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng

Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Compensation for delays	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Ground for termination of contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	CAA Technologies v Newcon Builders: Termination of Sub-Contract & Compensation for Delays in Construction Project(Sep 2017)
Wong & Leow LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement Dispute(Dec 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CAA Technologies v Newcon Builders: Termination of Sub-Contract & Compensation for Delays in Construction Project 17 Sep 2017 CAA Technologies Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	17 Sep 2017	CAA Technologies Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the order for CAA to pay $407,000 to Newcon for liquidated damages paid to JTC was set aside.
2	Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement Dispute 09 Dec 2010 Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	09 Dec 2010	Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore.Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore. The court ordered costs at 90% to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, the deduction of 10% being the costs attributed to the arguments on the Riddick principle. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.