Jonathan Lee

Jonathan Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and taxation. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jonathan Lee has demonstrated expertise across 56 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvent Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Preference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jonathan Lee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	8 cases	89% of cases	Comptroller of Income Tax v BKW: Exchange of Information under Singapore-India DTA(Oct 2013) Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice(Sep 2013) Kikla v Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction(Feb 2013)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	11% of cases	GFX v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt Against Child Under Penal Code s 325 and s 74B(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jonathan Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.0 parties avg	4.0	56%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jonathan Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(56%)	56%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	18,522,287.97	3,704,457.595 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	GFX v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt Against Child Under Penal Code s 325 and s 74B 29 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
2	Comptroller of Income Tax v BKW: Exchange of Information under Singapore-India DTA 03 Oct 2013 R Ltd (Respondent, Applicant)Lost	03 Oct 2013	R Ltd (Respondent, Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside order dismissed.
3	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice 16 Sep 2013 Monitoring Committee (Respondent)Lost	16 Sep 2013	Monitoring Committee (Respondent): Application AllowedThe Monitoring Committee opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.
4	Kikla v Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 18 Feb 2013 HSBC Bank Middle East Limited (Defendant)Lost	18 Feb 2013	HSBC Bank Middle East Limited (Defendant): Application for stay of suit dismissedThe second defendant's application for a stay of the suit in favour of the courts of the United Arab Emirates was dismissed.
5	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Specific Performance & Property Sale Dispute 27 Sep 2011 E C Investment Holding Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2011	E C Investment Holding Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; specific performance denied; assessment of damages ordered. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Urs Meisterhans v GIP Pte Ltd: Application for Leave to Commence Legal Proceedings for Breach of Fiduciary Duties 27 Sep 2010 GIP Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Sep 2010	GIP Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of $8,000.00 awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Chee Yoh Chuang v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference, Directors' Duties & Insolvency 30 Aug 2010 Chee Yoh Chuang and Another (as Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (In Liquidation)) (Appellant)Won	30 Aug 2010	Chee Yoh Chuang and Another (as Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (In Liquidation)) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The respondent is ordered to repay to the liquidators all monies required to settle debts to unrelated creditors (as well as professional fees) up to the sum of $18,514,287.97 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi 28 Jan 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Appellant)Won	28 Jan 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found in favor of the appellant. Costs to be borne by each party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Liquidators of Progen Engineering v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference Claim 22 Dec 2009 Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Dec 2009	Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe liquidators' claim for repayment of funds due to unfair preference was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.