Kevin Tan Eu Shan

Kevin Tan Eu Shan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kevin Tan Eu Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kevin Tan Eu Shan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	PP v Masoud Rahimi & Mogan Raj: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2015)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kevin Tan Eu Shan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kevin Tan Eu Shan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	700,000.00	700,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement 16 Dec 2021 Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Dec 2021	Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the second, third, and fourth defendants for a total of US$700,000.
2	PP v Masoud Rahimi & Mogan Raj: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Nov 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Nov 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdictThe Public Prosecutor secured a guilty verdict against both accused.