Koh Junxiang

Koh Junxiang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 34 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and civil practice. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 21% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Junxiang has demonstrated expertise across 110 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	28 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	17 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	10 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ancillary disclosure order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False Representation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Running Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearing Protocol	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unpaid Vendor's Lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Absence of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-party discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Junxiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Junxiang has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 24 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CLASIS LLC	24 cases	71% of cases	DBL v DBM: Appeal against setting aside arbitral award for breach of natural justice in steel trading dispute(May 2024) Pandey v Bothra: Summary Judgment Appeal on Property Purchase Price & Limitation Act(Mar 2024) Riady Tjandra v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Cryptocurrency Bank Investment(Mar 2024)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	9 cases	26% of cases	Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd(Aug 2013) Rainforest Trading Ltd v State Bank of India: Enforceability of Equitable Mortgage and Conversion of Originating Summons(Mar 2012) Chen Chun Kang v Zhao Meirong: Enforcement of Default Judgment & False Representation(Dec 2011)
Shook Lin and Bok LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation(May 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Junxiang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 7 (21%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	103.0 parties avg	3.0	29%
Neutral	33.3 parties avg	3.3	9%
Other	19.0 parties avg	9.0	3%
Partial	63.0 parties avg	3.0	18%
Won	163.1 parties avg	3.1	47%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2021	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2022	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	63.3 parties avg	3.3
2024	32.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Junxiang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(28%)	28%
Neutral	3(8%)	8%
Other	1(3%)	3%
Partial	6(17%)	17%
Won	16(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	857,154.59	42,857.7320 cases	20
USD	500,000.00	500,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2023	6 2121	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Other: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 2 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2024	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 34 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DBL v DBM: Appeal against setting aside arbitral award for breach of natural justice in steel trading dispute 20 May 2024 DBL (Appellant)Lost	20 May 2024	DBL (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $60,000 awarded to the respondent.
2	Pandey v Bothra: Summary Judgment Appeal on Property Purchase Price & Limitation Act 26 Mar 2024 Deepak Mishra (Claimant)Neutral	26 Mar 2024	Deepak Mishra (Claimant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.
3	Riady Tjandra v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Cryptocurrency Bank Investment 04 Mar 2024 Riady Tjandra (Claimant)Won	04 Mar 2024	Riady Tjandra (Claimant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favor of Tjandra against Cheng in the sum of US$500,000.
4	Pandey v Bothra: Amendment of Defence and Counterclaim Post-Summary Judgment 26 Nov 2023 Nimisha Pandey (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	26 Nov 2023	Nimisha Pandey (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim): SUM 3265 allowed in partSUM 3265 allowed in part, with costs of $12,000 ordered in favor of the claimants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Karan Bagga v Stichting Chemical Distribution Institute: Defamation and Malicious Falsehood Claim 08 Nov 2023 Stichting Chemical Distribution Institute (Defendant)Won	08 Nov 2023	Stichting Chemical Distribution Institute (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed.
6	DBL v DBM: Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice Dismissed 21 Sep 2023 DBL (Claimant)Lost	21 Sep 2023	DBL (Claimant): Application DismissedDBL's application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
7	Micro Tellers v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Trust, Dishonest Assistance & Conspiracy 05 Sep 2023 Lee Moon Young (Defendant)Other	05 Sep 2023	Lee Moon Young (Defendant): Application grantedLeave to amend the writ to join Lee Moon Young as a party together with leave to make the amendments to the statement of claim relating to her joinder is granted.
8	Pandey v Bothra: Caveat Dispute over Unpaid Property Purchase Price under Land Titles Act 03 May 2023 Nimisha Pandey (Claimant)Partial	03 May 2023	Nimisha Pandey (Claimant): Application Allowed in PartPrayer (b) of the claimant’s application allowed; an order that the Balance Sum be paid into court and held pending the resolution of OC 138 and any appeal therefrom. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Thong Soon Seng v Magnus Energy Group Ltd: Claim for Debt and Unjust Enrichment 01 Feb 2023 Thong Soon Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Feb 2023	Thong Soon Seng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for debt and unjust enrichment was dismissed. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant costs of $132,300 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	CUG v CUH: Challenge to Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction on Contract Formation 01 Dec 2022 CUH (Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2022	CUH (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application to challenge the tribunal's jurisdiction was dismissed.
11	DMX Technologies v Deloitte: Non-Party Discovery & Service Out of Jurisdiction 13 Sep 2022 Tse, Fung Chun (Appellant)Lost	13 Sep 2022	Tse, Fung Chun (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in respect of the AR’s decision in Summons 2154.
12	Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information 17 Apr 2022 CXA Insurance Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Apr 2022	CXA Insurance Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to discharge injunction dismissedThe plaintiff's application to discharge the non-solicitation injunctions and the confidentiality injunctions was dismissed.
13	Twarit Consultancy Services v GPE (India) Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract 23 Dec 2021 Gaja Trustee Company Private Limited (Defendant)Won	23 Dec 2021	Gaja Trustee Company Private Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the originating summons, resulting in a judgment in favor of Gaja Trustee Company Private Limited.
14	Ishan Anoop Sakraney v Ameet Nalin Parikh: Contractual Interpretation and Fee Entitlement Dispute 20 Sep 2021 Ameet Nalin Parikh (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	20 Sep 2021	Ameet Nalin Parikh (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $40,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Parikh v Sakraney: Interpretation of Contractual Terms for Payment of Fees 01 Mar 2021 Ameet Nalin Parikh (Plaintiff)Won	01 Mar 2021	Ameet Nalin Parikh (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe plaintiff is entitled to fees for services rendered during the period between 14 June 2013 and 30 September 2017 (both dates inclusive) pursuant to Clause 4.2 of the Agreement, to be paid immediately upon the defendant’s and/or Shorai’s receipt of any monies and/or proceeds as set out in Clause 4.2.
16	Himalaya Food International Ltd v Simplot India LLC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Exceeding Scope of Submission 15 Oct 2020 Simplot India Foods Pvt Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Won	15 Oct 2020	Simplot India Foods Pvt Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Successful defense of arbitral awardSimplot India Foods Pvt Ltd successfully defended the arbitral award against Himalaya Food International Ltd's application to set it aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd v Straits: Abuse of Process & Pre-Action Discovery 05 Jul 2020 ED&F Man Capital Markets Limited (Appellant)Lost	05 Jul 2020	ED&F Man Capital Markets Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $65,000 inclusive of disbursements awarded to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	MAN Diesel v IM Skaugen: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 03 Dec 2019 Liquidator of IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Other)Neutral	03 Dec 2019	Liquidator of IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Other): NeutralLiquidator appeared on a watching brief.
19	ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd v Straits (Singapore) Pte Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Document Use 28 Aug 2019 ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	28 Aug 2019	ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Injunction granted against use of documents and information disclosed in OS 533 in proceedings outside of SingaporeInjunction granted against the plaintiff's use of documents and information disclosed in Originating Summons No 533 of 2017 in proceedings outside of Singapore.
20	Wang Weidong v SPM Global Services: Inducing Breach of Contract & Amendment of Pleadings 01 May 2018 Mark Aldie Stiffler (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	01 May 2018	Mark Aldie Stiffler (Defendant, Respondent): Application partially successfulThe application to amend the Statement of Claim to include a cause of action against this party was disallowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: Costs Allocation After Partially Successful Claim for Negligence, Assault, and Wrongful Imprisonment 08 Mar 2017 Goel Adesh Kumar (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Mar 2017	Goel Adesh Kumar (Plaintiff): Partial SuccessAwarded $36,732.59, representing 80% of the total damages of $45,915.74. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
22	JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 12 Jul 2016 JVL AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD (Plaintiff, Applicant)Won	12 Jul 2016	JVL AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application AllowedAward set aside; Agritrade to pay JVL's costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	SIC College v Yeo: Improper Evidence Rejection & Security for Costs in Civil Procedure 21 Jan 2016 SIC COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PTE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIC EDUCATION GROUP PTE LTD) (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	21 Jan 2016	SIC COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PTE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIC EDUCATION GROUP PTE LTD) (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; retrial ordered for the counterclaim. The main claim was dismissed due to failure to provide security for costs.
24	AYY v AYZ: Stay of Arbitration Application Under International Arbitration Act 15 Dec 2015 AYZ (Respondent)Won	15 Dec 2015	AYZ (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $1,500 awarded in their favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd 19 Aug 2013 Wong Lock Chee (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2013	Wong Lock Chee (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantCourt ordered Wong to rectify the share register of NCPL to reflect Yeoh's and HRT's entitlement to 33% of the shareholding in NCPL each (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Rainforest Trading Ltd v State Bank of India: Enforceability of Equitable Mortgage and Conversion of Originating Summons 20 Mar 2012 State Bank of India Singapore (Respondent)Won	20 Mar 2012	State Bank of India Singapore (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
27	Chen Chun Kang v Zhao Meirong: Enforcement of Default Judgment & False Representation 13 Dec 2011 Chen Chun Kang (Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Dec 2011	Chen Chun Kang (Plaintiff): Hearing AdjournedHearing of Summons adjourned to allow the Defendant a final opportunity to apply to set aside the Default Judgment.
28	Norwest Holdings v Newport Mining: Share Capital Sale Dispute After Sichuan Earthquake 22 Aug 2011 Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	22 Aug 2011	Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedNorwest's appeal was dismissed.
29	SBI Singapore v Rainforest Trading: Enforcement of Share Pledge & Fraud Allegations 03 Aug 2011 State Bank of India Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	03 Aug 2011	State Bank of India Singapore (Plaintiff): Declarations GrantedDeclarations granted that an event of default occurred and SBI SG is entitled to enforce its security over the Pledged Shares, subject to the provisions of the eSys Articles of Association. The court also directed a valuation of the Pledged Shares be conducted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation 10 May 2011 Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Respondent)Won	10 May 2011	Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
31	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Personal Liability for Costs in Security Redemption Dispute 23 May 2010 DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	23 May 2010	DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs awarded on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Norwest Holdings v Newport Mining: Contract Law, Earthquake Impact & 'As Is, Where Is' Sale 06 May 2010 Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	06 May 2010	Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedNorwest's claim for damages arising from Newport's failure to complete the purchase of the entire share capital of Norwest Chemicals was dismissed.
33	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Validity of Receiver Appointment & Mortgage Enforcement 05 Aug 2009 DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2009	DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowedAppeal in Civil Appeal No 19 of 2009 by DB Trustees is allowed. Costs of both appeals as well as the costs below awarded to DB Trustees, on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Enforcement of Trust Deed, Security Deed & Moneylenders Act 12 Mar 2009 DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Mar 2009	DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000.00 (exclusive of reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant.