Lee Cheow Han

Lee Cheow Han is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Offences	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tax Deductions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Workers Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Finding of fact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses' credibility and veracity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Cheow Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Cheow Han has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	6 cases	50% of cases	PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2008) PP v Lee Chez Kee: Murder, Common Intention, Robbery, Admissibility of Co-Accused Statements(Jan 2007) Khor Kok Soon v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure(Nov 2005)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	25% of cases	AQP v Comptroller of Income Tax: Income Tax Deduction for Misappropriated Funds(Jan 2013) Public Prosecutor v Ismail: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Injury(Nov 2003) Public Prosecutor v Rahmat Bin Abdullah: Drug Trafficking Sentencing Principles(Sep 2003)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	2 cases	17% of cases	Gan Too Cheh v PP: Employing Foreign Worker Outside Work Permit Conditions(Feb 2006) PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights(Mar 2004)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	8% of cases	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v The Official Assignee: Liability for Costs in Legal Action(Jul 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Cheow Han's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	92.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Cheow Han's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Other	1(8%)	8%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	9(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AQP v Comptroller of Income Tax: Income Tax Deduction for Misappropriated Funds 15 Jan 2013 Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent)Other	15 Jan 2013	Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent): OtherCase remitted to the Income Tax Board of Review for further evidence.
2	PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death 27 Jul 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Jul 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were found guilty as charged.
3	PP v Lee Chez Kee: Murder, Common Intention, Robbery, Admissibility of Co-Accused Statements 14 Jan 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Jan 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
4	Gan Too Cheh v PP: Employing Foreign Worker Outside Work Permit Conditions 09 Feb 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
5	Khor Kok Soon v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure 10 Nov 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Nov 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldConviction upheld. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
6	PP v Shanmugam: Importation of Cannabis - Disproving Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 May 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 May 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case.
7	Public Prosecutor v Yeow Ban Soon: Rape and Hurt Charges in Domestic Violence Context 12 Apr 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	12 Apr 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused acquitted of rape charges; convicted of causing hurtAccused acquitted of rape charges but convicted of causing hurt.
8	PP v Mohd Arsad: Trafficking Diamorphine Exceeding 15g - Mandatory Death Penalty 31 Mar 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	31 Mar 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was found guilty of drug trafficking.
9	PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Mar 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Mar 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and convicted; sentenced to death.
10	Public Prosecutor v Ismail: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Injury 18 Nov 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Nov 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was found guilty and convicted as charged.
11	Public Prosecutor v Rahmat Bin Abdullah: Drug Trafficking Sentencing Principles 10 Sep 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Sep 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionBoth accused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v The Official Assignee: Liability for Costs in Legal Action 16 Jul 2001 The Official Assignee (Defendant)Dismissed	16 Jul 2001	The Official Assignee (Defendant): Application DismissedNo order was made in respect of the originating summons. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.