Lim Kim Hong

Lim Kim Hong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and conspiracy by unlawful means. Their track record shows a 41.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 24% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated expertise across 85 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	13 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Saunders v Vautier	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Satisfactory Quality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employees’ Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equipment Rental	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of Basis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ministerial Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Void marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nullity of Marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voidable Marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adoptions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Annulment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kim Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Kim Hong has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kim & Co	16 cases	76% of cases	Kow Kim Song v Kow Kim Siang: Application for Sale of Property Under Supreme Court of Judicature Act(Sep 2024) Lau Sheng Jan v Lau Cheok Joo: Trust Termination & ABSD Avoidance(Jul 2023) Goh Siam Teow v Lim Tung Hee Arthero: Sale of Property Under Court Order for Person Lacking Capacity(May 2023)
Kim and Co	2 cases	10% of cases	Sun Hongyu v PP: Unlawful Return to Singapore & Immigration Act Interpretation(Apr 2005) Midlink v Stansfield: Tenancy Agreement Dispute over Silence as Acceptance(Aug 2004)
Messrs Kim & Co	1 cases	5% of cases	Zhou Weidong v Liew Kai Lung: Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Constructive Trust Dispute(Dec 2017)
M/s Kim & Co.	1 cases	5% of cases	Tan Joon Wei Wesley v Lee Kim Wei: Personal Injury Claim - Road Traffic Accident(Oct 2013)
Mas & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	Ng Chu Chong v Ng Swee Choon: Trademark Infringement Dispute After Partnership Dissolution(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Kim Hong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 5 (24%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	5%
Lost	92.6 parties avg	2.6	43%
Partial	34.5 parties avg	4.5	14%
Won	93.3 parties avg	3.3	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Kim Hong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	9(41%)	41%
Partial	3(14%)	14%
Won	9(41%)	41%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,526,358.72	377,196.5612 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kow Kim Song v Kow Kim Siang: Application for Sale of Property Under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 08 Sep 2024 Kow Kim Siang (Gao Jingxiang) (Respondent)Won	08 Sep 2024	Kow Kim Siang (Gao Jingxiang) (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of the application awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Lau Sheng Jan v Lau Cheok Joo: Trust Termination & ABSD Avoidance 20 Jul 2023 Lau Sheng Jan, Alistair (Applicant)Won	20 Jul 2023	Lau Sheng Jan, Alistair (Applicant): Application allowedApplicant's application for a declaration that the Trust be terminated and for the Property to be transferred from the respondents to the applicant was allowed.
3	Goh Siam Teow v Lim Tung Hee Arthero: Sale of Property Under Court Order for Person Lacking Capacity 31 May 2023 Goh Siam Teow (Applicant)Won	31 May 2023	Goh Siam Teow (Applicant): Application grantedApplication for the sale of the property was granted. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	Abdul Salam v Napisah: Gift Dispute Over Property Proceeds 19 Jun 2022 Napisah bte Chukor (Defendant)Won	19 Jun 2022	Napisah bte Chukor (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the court found that the properties were gifted to her. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd v Debenho Pte Ltd: Sale of Goods - Satisfactory Quality & Proof of Evidence 15 Feb 2022 Debenho Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 Feb 2022	Debenho Pte Ltd (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe buyer's claim for a full refund of the purchase price was dismissed.
6	Huatraco Singapore Pte Ltd v Hua Rong Engineering Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract in Equipment Rental Agreement 27 Apr 2020 Hua Rong Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Apr 2020	Hua Rong Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for $358,214.78 (SGD). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	CHL Construction v Yangguang Group: SOPA & Contract Termination 07 Mar 2019 Yangguang Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Mar 2019	Yangguang Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Determination set asideThe Amended Adjudication Determination was set aside.
8	Zhou Weidong v Liew Kai Lung: Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Constructive Trust Dispute 26 Dec 2017 Gobindram s/o M Harjani (Defendant)Dismissed	26 Dec 2017	Gobindram s/o M Harjani (Defendant): Claim DismissedZhou’s claim against Gobind dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Tan Joon Wei Wesley v Lee Kim Wei: Personal Injury Claim - Road Traffic Accident 31 Oct 2013 Tan Joon Wei Wesley (Plaintiff)Won	31 Oct 2013	Tan Joon Wei Wesley (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $963,198 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	ADP v ADQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance in Void Marriages under Women's Charter 18 Jan 2012 ADP (Appellant)Won	18 Jan 2012	ADP (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs and the usual consequential orders. The case was remitted to the second District Judge to decide the issues of both the division of matrimonial assets as well as that of maintenance on their merits. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
11	Chun Cheng Fishery v Chuang: Breach of Duty & Damages Assessment 10 Jul 2011 Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	10 Jul 2011	Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. The court awarded S$657,017.61 for loss of revenue and S$24,184.16 for loss from overstocking mahi mahi.
12	ADP v ADQ: Nullity of Marriage, Maintenance, and Division of Assets under the Women's Charter 17 Mar 2011 ADP (Appellant, Petitioner)Lost	17 Mar 2011	ADP (Appellant, Petitioner): Claim for maintenance deniedThe Appellant's claim for maintenance for herself was denied.
13	Chun Cheng Fishery v Chuang Hern Hsiung: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Damages Assessment 11 Oct 2010 Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Oct 2010	Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of S$1,593,339.83 (Singapore Dollars), comprising S$62,710.30 for TecBiz Frisman Pte Ltd fees, S$99,306.09 for Fourwin Co. Ltd fees, S$4,759.57 for Fourwin Co. Ltd disbursements, S$295,003.43 for Chio Lim & Associates fees, S$813,530 for loss of revenue/profit, and S$318,080.44 for loss from overstocking mahi mahi.
14	Arjun Upadhya v Public Prosecutor: Breach of Public Entertainment and Meetings Act for Employing Foreigners Without Valid Work Permits 29 Aug 2010 Arjun Upadhya (Appellant)Lost	29 Aug 2010	Arjun Upadhya (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction on four Deployment Charges dismissed.
15	Lin Chao-Feng v Chuang Hsin-Yi: Dispute over Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd 16 Jun 2010 Lin Chao-Feng (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Jun 2010	Lin Chao-Feng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Chun Cheng Fishery v Chuang Hern Hsiung: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conspiracy to Injure 17 Aug 2008 Tan Guan Ngo (Third Party)Won	17 Aug 2008	Tan Guan Ngo (Third Party): Claims dismissedClaims brought by the defendants against the third parties Lin and Tan were dismissed as baseless. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Conspiracy & Overcharging Dispute 02 Oct 2007 David's Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2007	David's Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDamages awarded for conspiracy. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Breach of Duty, Conspiracy, Overcharging 03 May 2007 David's Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	03 May 2007	David's Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Defendant for sums to be determined (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Sun Hongyu v PP: Unlawful Return to Singapore & Immigration Act Interpretation 12 Apr 2005 Sun Hongyu (Petitioner)Lost	12 Apr 2005	Sun Hongyu (Petitioner): Application DismissedThe petitioner's application for criminal revision was dismissed.
20	Midlink v Stansfield: Tenancy Agreement Dispute over Silence as Acceptance 19 Aug 2004 The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2004	The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff $679,928.08. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Ng Chu Chong v Ng Swee Choon: Trademark Infringement Dispute After Partnership Dissolution 27 Feb 2002 Ng Chu Chong trading as Grand Am Fashion Enterprise (Plaintiff)Won	27 Feb 2002	Ng Chu Chong trading as Grand Am Fashion Enterprise (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court granted the injunction and other orders as applied for. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.