Low Poh Ling

Low Poh Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in schemes of arrangement and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 53.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Poh Ling has demonstrated expertise across 117 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	15 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	14 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	10 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admission of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Application	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression Remedy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disqualification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Effect of bankruptcy on directorship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Debt Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholding Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-border disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder's Loans	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
E-discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring Expenses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Dutch Auction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership and Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Petition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Management Consultancy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pari passu principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mediation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negotiation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Poh Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Poh Ling has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	12 cases	63% of cases	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies(May 2015) Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of Arrangement(May 2014) Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence(Sep 2013)
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	16% of cases	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Breach of Warranty(May 2006) John While Springs v Goh Sai Chuah: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Business Diversion(May 2001) John While Springs (S) Pte Ltd v Goh: Winding Up Petition Based on Just and Equitable Ground(Mar 2001)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	11% of cases	Re Punj Lloyd: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Opposition(Dec 2015) Re Sembawang Engineers: Convening Creditors Meeting for Scheme of Arrangement(Sep 2015)
Rajah and Tann	2 cases	11% of cases	Ho Kian Cheong v Ho Kian Guan: Application for Further and Better Particulars(May 2004) Hitachi v Eltraco: Direct Payment to Subcontractors & Scheme of Arrangement(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Poh Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 12 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.9 parties avg	3.9	32%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5%
Partial	23.3 parties avg	3.3	11%
Won	105.2 parties avg	5.2	53%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	29.0 parties avg	9.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2014	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	33.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Poh Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(32%)	32%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	2(11%)	11%
Won	10(53%)	53%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.007 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Punj Lloyd: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Opposition 15 Dec 2015 Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Neutral	15 Dec 2015	Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Orders for meetings to be held not set asideThe court refused to set aside the orders for meetings to be held under s 210(1) of the Companies Act.
2	Re Sembawang Engineers: Convening Creditors Meeting for Scheme of Arrangement 22 Sep 2015 Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	22 Sep 2015	Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe company's application under s 210(1) of the Companies Act was allowed, with a modification to convene the meeting within four months.
3	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies 18 May 2015 Second Respondent (Respondent)Partial	18 May 2015	Second Respondent (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, but the court found that the third respondent lacked capacity due to a combination of mental impairment and undue influence, which negatively impacts the second respondent.
4	Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of Arrangement 15 May 2014 Banks (Appellant)Won	15 May 2014	Banks (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence 30 Sep 2013 AI (Appellant, Defendant)Won	30 Sep 2013	AI (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; original decision set aside; costs reversed in appellant's favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Re Beloff: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, nTan Corporate Advisory, Scheme of Arrangement, Natural Justice 16 Sep 2013 Monitoring Committee (Respondent)Lost	16 Sep 2013	Monitoring Committee (Respondent): Application AllowedThe Monitoring Committee opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.
7	Royal Bank of Scotland v TT International: Duty to Disclose Value-Added Fee in Scheme of Arrangement 26 Sep 2012 The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others (Appellant)Partial	26 Sep 2012	The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Court directed the parties to reach an agreement on the appropriate amount of professional fees for the scheme manager; otherwise, the fees will be assessed by a High Court Judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Holland Leedon v Metalform: Breach of Warranty & Damages Calculation 29 Apr 2012 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2012	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	RBS v TT International: Scheme of Arrangement - Creditor Classification, Voting Rights, Scheme Manager Duties 30 Jan 2012 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2012	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of appeal and the hearing below to both appellants.
10	Holland Leedon v Metalform Asia: Application for Leave to Appeal Arbitration Decision 13 Feb 2011 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	13 Feb 2011	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application granted in earlier proceedingsThe plaintiff was granted leave under s 49(5) of the Arbitration Act to appeal against certain questions of law arising from an award issued by the sole Arbitrator in SIA Arbitration No 069/DA17/05.
11	Liquidators of Natural Fuel v Power Knight: Priority of Creditors' Interests over Fixed Charge 09 Mar 2010 Liquidators of Natural Fuel Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Liquidators of Natural Fuel Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedThe liquidators' application was dismissed.
12	Power Knight v Natural Fuel: Caveat Removal & Statutory Trust in Liquidation 09 Mar 2010 LIM LOO KHOON (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	LIM LOO KHOON (Defendant): Caveat to be removedThe Liquidators' Caveat and the Company's Caveat are to be removed.
13	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Variation & Escrow Sum Dispute 30 Jun 2009 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	30 Jun 2009	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedHolland Leedon's application to vary the injunction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Michael de Kretser Consultants v De Kretser: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employment Contract 07 May 2008 Michael de Kretser Consultants Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 May 2008	Michael de Kretser Consultants Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants, and further order that damages be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Breach of Warranty 04 May 2006 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 May 2006	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application for an injunction (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Ho Kian Cheong v Ho Kian Guan: Application for Further and Better Particulars 19 May 2004 Ho Kian Cheong (Plaintiff)Won	19 May 2004	Ho Kian Cheong (Plaintiff): Preliminary objections dismissedThe court dismissed the preliminary objections raised by the third defendant.
17	Hitachi v Eltraco: Direct Payment to Subcontractors & Scheme of Arrangement 05 Oct 2003 Hitachi Plant Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2003	Hitachi Plant Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	John While Springs v Goh Sai Chuah: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Business Diversion 02 May 2001 Segno Precision Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 May 2001	Segno Precision Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffConsent judgment entered against the defendants.
19	John While Springs (S) Pte Ltd v Goh: Winding Up Petition Based on Just and Equitable Ground 21 Mar 2001 Segno Precision Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	21 Mar 2001	Segno Precision Pte Ltd (Respondent): Petitions dismissedThe winding up petitions against Segno Precision Pte Ltd were dismissed.