Michael Por

Michael Por is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Michael Por has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Design and build contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duties and liabilities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Progress Payment Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Economic Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drawings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conservation Areas	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Michael Por has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Michael Por has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Por Law Corporation	3 cases	50% of cases	Wei Siang v Euro Assets: Building Renovation, Conservation Guidelines & Negligence(Aug 2018) Goh Eng Lee Andy v Yeo Jin Kow: Design and Build Contract Dispute(Jun 2016) Compact Metal Industries v PPG Industries: Construction Dispute, Defective Paint & Damages(Apr 2012)
Tan Lee & Partners	2 cases	33% of cases	Wellmix Organics v Lau Yu Man: Appealability of Order Setting Aside Default Judgment(Mar 2006) Lam Hong Leong Aluminium v Lian Teck Huat: Guarantee, Construction Contract Dispute(Mar 2003)
Tan Lee and Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Lee Kiang Leng Stanley v Lee Han Chew: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings and Unfair Preference(Jul 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Michael Por's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	33%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Michael Por's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	3(50%)	50%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,536,272.53	384,068.134 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wei Siang v Euro Assets: Building Renovation, Conservation Guidelines & Negligence 22 Aug 2018 Wei Siang Design Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Partial	22 Aug 2018	Wei Siang Design Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claim Allowed in PartClaim allowed in respect of variation works done to install an additional rainwater drop pipe. All of the contractor’s remaining claims against the owner are dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Goh Eng Lee Andy v Yeo Jin Kow: Design and Build Contract Dispute 01 Jun 2016 Goh Eng Lee Andy (Plaintiff)Won	01 Jun 2016	Goh Eng Lee Andy (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $692,132.53 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Compact Metal Industries v PPG Industries: Construction Dispute, Defective Paint & Damages 29 Apr 2012 Compact Metal Industries Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	29 Apr 2012	Compact Metal Industries Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartPlaintiff's appeal allowed in part; defendant to reimburse $840,000 in liquidated damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Wellmix Organics v Lau Yu Man: Appealability of Order Setting Aside Default Judgment 20 Mar 2006 Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	20 Mar 2006	Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal struck outAppeal struck out; Wellmix Organics to pay costs of the motion and one-third of the costs of the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lee Kiang Leng Stanley v Lee Han Chew: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings and Unfair Preference 18 Jul 2004 Lee Kiang Leng Stanley (Debtor, Appellant)Partial	18 Jul 2004	Lee Kiang Leng Stanley (Debtor, Appellant): Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in partAppeal against the decision of the assistant registrar was partially allowed and partially dismissed.
6	Lam Hong Leong Aluminium v Lian Teck Huat: Guarantee, Construction Contract Dispute 09 Mar 2003 Chew Joon Huat (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2003	Chew Joon Huat (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe first and second defendants' counterclaim against the plaintiffs is dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).