Monica Neo Kim Cheng

Monica Neo Kim Cheng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and adjudication. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	3 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Monica Neo Kim Cheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Monica Neo Kim Cheng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chan Neo LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	UES Holdings v KH Foges: Adjudication Determination, Apparent Bias & Security of Payment Act(May 2017) Tienrui Design v G & Y Trading: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOP Act(Sep 2015)
Chan Tan & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Chew Pin Pin v AGF Insurance: Performance Bond Call Dispute(Feb 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Monica Neo Kim Cheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Monica Neo Kim Cheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	210,000.00	105,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UES Holdings v KH Foges: Adjudication Determination, Apparent Bias & Security of Payment Act 28 May 2017 KH Foges Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 May 2017	KH Foges Pte Ltd (Defendant): Adjudication Determination upheldThe Defendant successfully defended against the Plaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination.
2	Tienrui Design v G & Y Trading: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOP Act 15 Sep 2015 Tienrui Design & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Sep 2015	Tienrui Design & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed; costs fixed at $5,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chew Pin Pin v AGF Insurance: Performance Bond Call Dispute 28 Feb 2001 Chew Pin Pin (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	28 Feb 2001	Chew Pin Pin (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; AGF Insurance must pay the bond amount of $205,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).