Palmer Michael Anthony

Palmer Michael Anthony is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 27.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best effort obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obligations imposed	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal loan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intoxication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Palmer Michael Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Palmer Michael Anthony has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	9 cases	90% of cases	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Dispute over Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds & Contractual Terms(Aug 2022) Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Effort Obligations in Loan Repayment Dispute(Jan 2022) Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity(May 2020)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	10% of cases	Sum Yue Holdings v Foo Sek Soon: Conspiracy, Breach of Director/Employee Duties, Transfer of Project(Jun 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Palmer Michael Anthony's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 6 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	34.8 parties avg	4.8	30%
Won	36.6 parties avg	6.6	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Palmer Michael Anthony's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(45%)	45%
Partial	3(27%)	27%
Won	3(27%)	27%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	356,054.14	71,210.835 cases	5
USD	42,950,829.71	42,950,829.711 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Dispute over Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds & Contractual Terms 25 Aug 2022 Kim Byung Gun (Defendant)Partial	25 Aug 2022	Kim Byung Gun (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part for S$331,054.14 and KRW41,146,120. Assumed SGD, as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Effort Obligations in Loan Repayment Dispute 09 Jan 2022 CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	09 Jan 2022	CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; all outstanding amounts under the Loan Agreement are due and payable. The court assumed USD as the loan was extended in USD.
3	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity 18 May 2020 Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	18 May 2020	Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Alphire Group Pte Ltd to pay costs of $25,000 to the respondent.
4	Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Derivative Action, Directors' Duties & Companies Act 27 Apr 2020 Ong Kim Siong (Defendant)Lost	27 Apr 2020	Ong Kim Siong (Defendant): Leave granted to PlaintiffLeave was granted to the plaintiff to bring an action on behalf of Trillion against the directors for breach of duties.
5	BXY v BXX: Dispute Over Tribunal Jurisdiction in SIAC Arbitration 18 Jul 2019 BYB (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	18 Jul 2019	BYB (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application was dismissed.
6	Ma Wai Fong Kathryn v Trillion Investment: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds 19 Mar 2019 Patrick Wong Haw Yeong (Respondent)Won	19 Mar 2019	Patrick Wong Haw Yeong (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal to wind up Double Ace Trading Company (Private) Limited was allowed.
7	Resorts World v Lee Fook Kheun: Casino Credit Facility, Intoxication & Contract Rescission 30 Jul 2018 Lee Fook Kheun (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2018	Lee Fook Kheun (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for the return of sums paid to RWS is dismissed (currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Winding Up Application Based on Just & Equitable Grounds 17 Apr 2018 Faxlink Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Apr 2018	Faxlink Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Tomolugen v Silica: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression & Stay of Proceedings 25 Oct 2015 TOMOLUGEN HOLDINGS LIMITED (Appellant)Partial	25 Oct 2015	TOMOLUGEN HOLDINGS LIMITED (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part.
10	Sum Yue Holdings v Foo Sek Soon: Conspiracy, Breach of Director/Employee Duties, Transfer of Project 28 Jun 2010 Bob Lim (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2010	Bob Lim (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.