Parmar Karam Singh

Parmar Karam Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and bifurcation of proceedings. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bifurcation of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rent Charges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Functions of judge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expert witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Parmar Karam Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Parmar Karam Singh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	100% of cases	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Costs Dispute in Construction Delay Case(Aug 2023) Dai Yi Ting v Chuang Fu Yuan: Bifurcation Order in Personal Injury Case(Oct 2022) Thian Leng Chong Toh Tong v Thian Leng Old Folks Home: Recovery of Possession & Unpaid Rent(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Parmar Karam Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Parmar Karam Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,783,153.40	1,195,788.354 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Costs Dispute in Construction Delay Case 02 Aug 2023 Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	02 Aug 2023	Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Successful party entitled to costsCrescendas is the successful party and is entitled to costs for both the first tranche and the second tranche of the trial. Total amount of costs and disbursements that JPW has to pay Crescendas for the first tranche and the second tranche of the trial as well as the interlocutory matters is $1,314,502.88 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Dai Yi Ting v Chuang Fu Yuan: Bifurcation Order in Personal Injury Case 10 Oct 2022 Grabcycle (SG) Pte Ltd (Third Party)Neutral	10 Oct 2022	Grabcycle (SG) Pte Ltd (Third Party): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome mentioned for the third party in relation to the bifurcation application.
3	Thian Leng Chong Toh Tong v Thian Leng Old Folks Home: Recovery of Possession & Unpaid Rent 20 Jul 2022 Thian Leng Chong Toh Tong (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	20 Jul 2022	Thian Leng Chong Toh Tong (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; judgment for vacant possession, unpaid rent of S$200,000, interest of S$43,219.61, and double value of S$575,076.61 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Damages for Delay in Biopolis 3 Construction 09 Aug 2021 Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	09 Aug 2021	Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $2,693,573.91 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Construction Contract Dispute over Preliminaries, Performance Bond, Shared Savings & Project Delays 10 Jan 2019 Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Partial	10 Jan 2019	Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Partial JudgmentClaim for delays allowed in part; defendant liable for general damages for 133 days of delays in the completion of the Project; claim for a refund of the portion of the additional preliminaries it paid to the defendant for 133 days of delay only allowed.