Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC

Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and recognition of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Claims by sub-contractor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutes and regulations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	UWF v UWH: Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in Will Dispute(Dec 2020) Independent State of Papua New Guinea v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Stay of Appeal Pending Payment of Costs(Nov 2019) Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Philip Antony Jeyaretnam SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	2,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UWF v UWH: Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in Will Dispute 21 Dec 2020 UWI (Defendant)Won	21 Dec 2020	UWI (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendants' counterclaim allowed.
2	Independent State of Papua New Guinea v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Stay of Appeal Pending Payment of Costs 18 Nov 2019 PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Respondent, Applicant)Won	18 Nov 2019	PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd (Respondent, Applicant): Application dismissed with costsPNGSDP's application for a stay of proceedings was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore 17 Sep 2019 Paulus Tannos (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2019	Paulus Tannos (Respondent): Application dismissedRespondents' application for setting aside the recognition order was dismissed.
4	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Construction Contract Dispute over Preliminaries, Performance Bond, Shared Savings & Project Delays 10 Jan 2019 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	10 Jan 2019	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Partial JudgmentCounterclaim for share of shared savings allowed; liable for general damages for 133 days of delays in the completion of the Project; claim for a refund of the portion of the additional preliminaries it paid to the defendant for 133 days of delay only allowed.
5	AES Façade Pte Ltd v Wyse Private Limited: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call Dispute 19 Jul 2018 Wyse Private Limited (Defendant)Won	19 Jul 2018	Wyse Private Limited (Defendant): WonThe court found that the plaintiff failed to discharge its burden of proving that the first defendant had acted unconscionably, and dismissed the application.
6	AES Façade Pte Ltd v WYSE Pte Ltd: Security of Payment Act & Sub-Contractor Claims 17 Jul 2017 WYSE Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	17 Jul 2017	WYSE Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside ORC 1337 was dismissed with costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).