Philip Fong

Philip Fong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 47 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and securities fraud. Their track record shows a 47.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 16 complex cases, representing 34% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Philip Fong has demonstrated expertise across 163 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	30 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 30 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	21 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgment of Debt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stocks and shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best commercial endeavours	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Paediatrics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of writ out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Acquisition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Acquisition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvent Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Preference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Industry Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indefeasibility of Title	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forex Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Customs Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Practices	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Management Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Applications	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Philip Fong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 35 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	35 cases	74% of cases	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act(May 2010) Liquidators of Progen Engineering v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference Claim(Dec 2009) Ng Eng Ghee v Mamata Kapildev Dave: Costs Allocation in Collective Sale Dispute(Jul 2009)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	11 cases	23% of cases	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties(Nov 2017) Chia Foong Lin v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Doctor's Misdiagnosis of Kawasaki Disease(Jun 2017) AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Unauthorized Trading & Agency in Securities Market(Dec 2016)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	Lam Kwok Tai Leslie v. Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Philip Fong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 16 (34%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	173.2 parties avg	3.2	36%
Neutral	213.3 parties avg	13.3	4%
Partial	65.1 parties avg	5.1	13%
Won	224.3 parties avg	4.3	47%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	83.9 parties avg	3.9
2002	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	26.2 parties avg	6.2
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2007	76.4 parties avg	6.4
2008	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	46.0 parties avg	6.0
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2011	25.2 parties avg	5.2
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	34.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Philip Fong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	17(36%)	36%
Neutral	2(4%)	4%
Partial	6(13%)	13%
Won	22(47%)	47%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	63,885,213.65	2,281,614.7728 cases	28

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	8 35	Lost: 3 cases (37.5%) Won: 5 cases (62.5%)
2002	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	7 2212	Lost: 2 cases (28.6%) Neutral: 2 cases (28.6%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 2 cases (28.6%)
2008	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 47 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties 30 Nov 2017 Tan Boon Kian (Defendant)Lost	30 Nov 2017	Tan Boon Kian (Defendant): Shares to be purchasedThe court ordered Maxz Universal and Rodney Tan to purchase Tan Eck Hong's shares at a fair value, adjusted for the oppressive actions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lam Kwok Tai Leslie v. Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent 19 Oct 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	19 Oct 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Dr. Lam was allowed, overturning the SMC's decision.
3	Chia Foong Lin v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Doctor's Misdiagnosis of Kawasaki Disease 26 Jun 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Disciplinary Tribunal's decision against Dr. Chia was upheld.
4	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Unauthorized Trading & Agency in Securities Market 26 Dec 2016 GOH CHENGYU (WU CHENGYU) (Defendant)Lost	26 Dec 2016	GOH CHENGYU (WU CHENGYU) (Defendant): Counterclaims DismissedDefendant's counterclaims were dismissed, and the Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff $1,888,954.60 plus interest. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
5	Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice 24 Jul 2016 Singapore Medical Council (Applicant)Won	24 Jul 2016	Singapore Medical Council (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Singapore Medical Council's appeal was allowed, and Dr. Wong was found guilty of the charge.
6	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Summary Judgment, Unauthorized Trading & Conclusive Evidence Clauses 28 Jul 2014 Goh Chengyu (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2014	Goh Chengyu (Defendant): Unconditional leave to defend grantedThe Defendant was granted unconditional leave to defend Suit 88 of 2014 in a trial.
7	Broadcast Solutions v Zoom Communications: Setting Aside Order & Forum Non Conveniens 17 Dec 2013 Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Dec 2013	Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Zoom Communications Ltd against the dismissal of its application to set aside an order granting Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd leave to serve a writ of summons in India and to stay proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens was dismissed.
8	Yang Chun v Yang Chia Yin: Estate Administration & Capacity to Execute Power of Attorney 02 Oct 2013 Mrs Yang Chun née Sun Hui Min (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2013	Mrs Yang Chun née Sun Hui Min (Plaintiff): Interim orders grantedInterim orders were made for the defendant to pay $100,000 to the plaintiff’s solicitors to defray the plaintiff’s future medical expenses as well as reimburse Sun Chi Hao @ Yang Howard the sum of $52,202.53 incurred by him for the plaintiff’s medical expenses (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Cherie Hearts v G8 Education: Business Acquisition, Repudiatory Breach & Specific Performance 08 Apr 2012 G8 Education Ltd (Defendant)Won	08 Apr 2012	G8 Education Ltd (Defendant): Specific performance of the Business Acquisition Contract grantedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. Specific performance of the Business Acquisition Contract granted to the defendant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Law Society of Singapore v Andre Arul: Disciplinary Action for Gross Overcharging 06 Oct 2011 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	06 Oct 2011	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application grantedThe Law Society's application was granted, and the respondent was fined $50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Woon Brothers Investments v Management Corp: Conversion of Originating Summons to Writ for Fraud Allegations 24 Aug 2011 International Associated Company Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	24 Aug 2011	International Associated Company Pte Ltd (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $10,000 awarded to the Second to Fifth Respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Chee Yoh Chuang v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference, Directors' Duties & Insolvency 30 Aug 2010 Progen Holdings Ltd (Respondent)Lost	30 Aug 2010	Progen Holdings Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The respondent is ordered to repay to the liquidators all monies required to settle debts to unrelated creditors (as well as professional fees) up to the sum of $18,514,287.97 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act 20 May 2010 Purcell Peter Francis (Plaintiff)Lost	20 May 2010	Purcell Peter Francis (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed with costs.
14	Liquidators of Progen Engineering v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference Claim 22 Dec 2009 Progen Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Dec 2009	Progen Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Progen Holdings Ltd for unfair preference was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Ng Eng Ghee v Mamata Kapildev Dave: Costs Allocation in Collective Sale Dispute 06 Jul 2009 Ong Sioe Hong (Appellant)Partial	06 Jul 2009	Ong Sioe Hong (Appellant): Partial costs awardedEntitled to 60% of costs for the Second Tranche of the Horizon Board proceedings, the High Court proceedings and CA 119/2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Agrosin Pte Ltd v Martynov Igor: Breach of Director's Duties, Understated Costs, and Unpaid Salary Dispute 25 Jun 2009 Martynov Igor (Defendant)Partial	25 Jun 2009	Martynov Igor (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for unpaid salary allowed with interest at 5.33% from 29 March 2007. The currency is SGD as the salary was claimed in SGD.
17	Chua Li Hoon Matilda v Public Prosecutor: False Trading & Falsifying Accounts under Securities Industry Act & Penal Code 14 May 2009 Seah Say Yoong (Appellant, Respondent)Won	14 May 2009	Seah Say Yoong (Appellant, Respondent): Acquitted of abetting Quek to falsify the accounts of SHPLAcquitted of abetting Quek to falsify the accounts of SHPL (DAC 43701/2006).
18	Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Contract 08 Jun 2008 Lee Chee Wei (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jun 2008	Lee Chee Wei (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded at $3.57m against the first, third and fourth defendants jointly with interest at 5% per annum from date of judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Registrar of Vehicles v Komoco Motors: Judicial Review & ARF Calculation 07 May 2008 Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	07 May 2008	Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs.
20	Public Prosecutor v Wang Ziyi Able: Sentencing for Reckless Dissemination of False Information under the Securities and Futures Act 10 Mar 2008 Wang Ziyi Able (Respondent)Lost	10 Mar 2008	Wang Ziyi Able (Respondent): Custodial SentenceSentenced to six months’ imprisonment.
21	PP v Wang Ziyi Able: Disseminating False Information & Securities Trading 28 Nov 2007 Wang Ziyi Able (Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2007	Wang Ziyi Able (Respondent): ConvictionThe respondent was convicted on the charge under Section 199(b)(i) of the Securities & Futures Act.
22	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Strata Titles Board Powers 10 Oct 2007 Others (Second Intervener)Neutral	10 Oct 2007	Others (Second Intervener): NeutralThe intervener's position was noted but no specific outcome was assigned.
23	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention 30 Sep 2007 Ng Eng Ghee (Respondent)Neutral	30 Sep 2007	Ng Eng Ghee (Respondent): OtherApplication to intervene allowed.
24	Malayan Banking Berhad v Sivakolunthu Thirunavukarasu: Indefeasibility of Title & Mortgage Fraud 27 Sep 2007 Sim Ah Ban (Defendant)Lost	27 Sep 2007	Sim Ah Ban (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendants’ counter-claim is dismissed.
25	PlanAssure PAC v Gaelic Inns: Auditor Negligence & Duty to Detect Fraud 29 Aug 2007 Gaelic Inns Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	29 Aug 2007	Gaelic Inns Pte Ltd (Respondent): Damages awardedDamages awarded, but reduced due to contributory negligence. Respondent to receive $317,108.03 with interest of 3% per annum from 22 July 2005. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Komoco Motors v Registrar of Vehicles: Judicial Review of ARF Assessment 16 May 2007 Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	16 May 2007	Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application GrantedApplication for judicial review granted in favor of Komoco Motors Pte Ltd.
27	Gaelic Inns v Patrick Lee: Auditor Negligence in Failing to Detect Employee Fraud 28 Jan 2007 Gaelic Inns Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jan 2007	Gaelic Inns Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $775,266.02 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the writ and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Progen Engineering v Winter Engineering: Arbitrator Fees & Appeal Delay in Construction Subcontract Dispute 07 Dec 2006 Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	07 Dec 2006	Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for leave to appeal and extension of time was dismissed.
29	Summit Co v Pacific Biosciences: Winding Up Petition by Minority Shareholder 18 Oct 2006 Pacific Biosciences Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	18 Oct 2006	Pacific Biosciences Pte Ltd (Respondent): Petition dismissedWinding up petition dismissed.
30	Progen Engineering v Chua Aik Kia: Arbitration Award Appeal on Questions of Law and Arbitrator Misconduct 06 Sep 2006 Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	06 Sep 2006	Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Application dismissed with costsProgen's application to set aside the arbitration award and for leave to appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract 11 Jul 2006 Lee Chee Wei (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jul 2006	Lee Chee Wei (Plaintiff): Claim for specific performance or payment of the balance purchase price is disallowedThe plaintiff's claim for specific performance or payment of the balance purchase price is disallowed.
32	Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall: Unilateral Mistake in Online Contracts 12 Jan 2005 Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2005	Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; the appellants shall bear two-thirds of the taxed costs of the trial. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Chia Yang Pong v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Committee's Decision on Professional Misconduct 30 May 2004 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Partial	30 May 2004	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal was partially allowed against the Singapore Medical Council as the fine was reduced from $65,000 to $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	Chuan & Company Pte Ltd v Ong Soon Huat: Limitation Act & Acknowledgment of Debt 04 Apr 2003 Ong Soon Huat (Respondent)Won	04 Apr 2003	Ong Soon Huat (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; respondent to receive costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Sim Yak Song v Lim Chang: Transfer of Partnership Property After Partner Retirement 28 Mar 2003 Phee Ser Guan (Plaintiff)Won	28 Mar 2003	Phee Ser Guan (Plaintiff): Order grantedOrder granted for the defendants to sign the relevant documents transferring the property to the plaintiffs.
36	Chuan & Company Pte Ltd v Ong Soon Huat: Limitation Act & Acknowledgment of Debt 27 Nov 2002 Ong Soon Huat (Defendant)Won	27 Nov 2002	Ong Soon Huat (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	HillField International v Chew Lai Yoke: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Missing Belongings 09 Oct 2002 Chew Lai Yoke Bettina (Defendant)Partial	09 Oct 2002	Chew Lai Yoke Bettina (Defendant): Defendant to return certain itemsDefendant shall return the Telescope, the Hyacinth Macaw, the three Sapphires gemstones, and All invoices, documents and photographs taken on the art objects and sculptures belonging to Selby.
38	Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Statutory Interpretation 06 Dec 2001 Teo Kian Leong (Appellant)Lost	06 Dec 2001	Teo Kian Leong (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	Banque Nationale De Paris v Tan Nancy: Agency, Authority, and Costs in Share Transactions 04 Dec 2001 Tan Nancy (Respondent)Won	04 Dec 2001	Tan Nancy (Respondent): Successful defenceSuccessful defence against claims. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	Banque Nationale v Tan Nancy: Unauthorized Trading & Authority in Forex Transactions 20 Nov 2001 Tan Nancy (Respondent)Lost	20 Nov 2001	Tan Nancy (Respondent): Claims AllowedThe court allowed the claims against Nancy Tan for a sum of 32,365,000, representing the loss incurred in the forex transactions in October 1998. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	Wang Cong Qin Bobby v Ong Heng Huat: Dispute over Interest Payments for Loan Secured by Company Properties 29 Jul 2001 Ong Seng Leong (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jul 2001	Ong Seng Leong (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJudgment for the second plaintiffs in the amount of $686,687.61 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
42	Wang CongQin Bobby v Ong Heng Huat: Enforceability of Contract & Use of Company Assets as Collateral 29 Jul 2001 Ong Seng Leong (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jul 2001	Ong Seng Leong (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJudgment for the plaintiff; claim allowed in the amount of $686,687.61 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
43	Quah Su-Ling v Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd: Abridgement of Time for EOGM Notice under Companies Act 23 Jul 2001 Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 Jul 2001	Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Application DeniedApplication for stay of orders disallowed.
44	De Souza Tay & Goh v Singapore Press Holdings: Defamation Claim over Article on L&H 15 Jun 2001 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Defendant)Won	15 Jun 2001	Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' defamation claim was dismissed.
45	Ang Ah Lah Richard v Singapore Turf Club: Disqualification of Horse Trainer for Doping 09 Apr 2001 Singapore Turf Club (Defendant)Won	09 Apr 2001	Singapore Turf Club (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
46	Banque Nationale de Paris v Hew Keong Chan Gary: Accessory Liability & Unauthorized Transactions 19 Nov 2000 Nancy Tan (Defendant)Won	19 Nov 2000	Nancy Tan (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against all defendants was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
47	Tan Tiang Hin Jerry v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Natural Justice 22 Mar 2000 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	22 Mar 2000	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent was ordered to pay two thirds of the costs here and below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).